Jump to content
SAU Community

Why Go From A 20 To 25


Recommended Posts

come on roy boy..

don't bring motorsport in to it.

racing prepared car compared to street car is silly.

You'll agree that a run of the mill VL flexidore is a useless chassis in comparison to an R32 gtst.

possibly good for straight line..

but turning is not it's forte.

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Guest trikdoutvl

the reason ppls skylines handle awsome is cause jap ppl put coil overs n shit n do the suspension rite up, were as commodore nutz suspension aint that high on the list of todo things commpaired to fully hektic sterios n 20 inch mags....... lol

wat basis do u have for a vl chassic is crap commpaided to a r32.... wats to say my standard rb20 vl wouldnt be as fast around the track if i had coilovers n everything the skyline guys bolt on to there cars lol.....

i think the gtr's won in 90 roy with skafie/richards driving, i dont think the group A/walkinshaw won bathurst

skylines chassis would be a better design/stiffer. i say would be as obviously its a bit hard to do back to back testing, but theres been heaps of cases where VL's have run 11's (some faster/some slower) and you cant open the back doors for like half an hour after the run lol

as above..

the VL chassis is not stiff or re-enforced in any way.

how else do you think your LARGER car weighs 100kg less?

also, VL brakes are pretty good.. when they are bolted to a ford laser.

on the VL they are useless.

so these are some of the reasons why a regular VL would be slower on a circuit than a regular R32 GTST

VL turbo brakes are decent enough for a car of its weight. But yes the VL chassis / suspension isnt briliant. But there is plenty of aftermarket parts that will sort that out. Also, comparing a VL to an R32 is a bit rough, its more equitable to an R31. Then again the bulk of the car is dated back to the VB, so other then some small tweaks you woudl have to say the suspension wasnt all that bad, no doubt it aged quickly towards the lates 80s.

There is a VL running around doing track days in Vic with a few guys running VBs and VHs. Considering they only have about 300hp at the engine they are doing damn good times.

Point is they are not that bad you can categorically write them off

Guest trikdoutvl

caint argue with vl brakes being bad lol i call em flintstone breaks LOL..\

titan was talking about why diddnt nissan bring out rb30et's factory... 2 big capacity or something (shrugs)

ive only driven a couple of skylines n neva got to really give 1 a good driving but i giv my vl flogs n it handles good IMO but it does have pedders spring shocks panhard rod strut braces nolethane bushes.. some1 take me for a rap in there skyline with collies :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 🫠    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
×
×
  • Create New...