Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've had a good search around the forums for this and havent specificly found thse answer I'm looking for.

I have a 32 gts-t rb20, and a 32 gtr cooler sitting spare.

A decent piping job to hook up to the standard inlet manifold by the look of it.

I'm thinking if there's a cheap enough front facing plenum for the RB20, would it almost be as cost effective to install that when i get my remap, and running a straight pipe up to it from the GTR cooler? POSSIBLY, although very unlikely, even using the GTR pipe for that section, and maybe getting away with a minor modification to it?

Has anyone looked into doing this? Or has something similar?

Also, can anyone steer me in the direction of a front facing rb20 plenum? I found one for around $1k, but can't justify spending that as I'm a student.

Any help or general advice would be great.

Cheers guys

Unless I've misinterpreted your post (which is possible as its quite late and I'm tired), no half decent front facing plenum is going to be cheaper than getting piping to the standard inlet plenum.

probably looking at around $200 for a piping kit from ebay. other option is to try and track down some used cooler piping to suit a R32 gtst.

A front facing plenum is going to be much much more than $200 (unless its a stocko cut & shut job or something) and then you still have to get piping for it anyway.

So IMO stick with the stock inlet and get FMIC piping kit.

PS.. How much did the GTR cooler set you back if you dont mind me asking? I smashed mine and thinking of getting a 32 GTR one to replace it.

Front facing plenums i have seen go for $600 to $1000 for good ones.

But i have heard its not worth it unless your after a lot of power.

Its hard to say though...how long is a piece of string...when does it become worthwhile?

I too think theres heaps of other stuff to concentrate on first but the shortened cooler piping is a big plus to me...

rb20's dont benefit very much at all from front facing plenums. if your doing if for the pure astheitcs, then maybe its worth it its up to you if you want to spend the money on a decent one, your unlikely to come across any second hand good quality plenums for the 20, and i would advise you not to go for a cut and shut jobby, it looks shit and theres a good chance you'll start leaning the motor out (some people swear by them while majority wouldnt touch them)

ive got a custom top half thats welded to the original runners (RB20 , i only got it because it was cheap, and i didnt want piping running everywhere, highmount etc.)

you could mess around with the GTR core or just get a cheap chinese kit that'll flow just as much as that old GTR core.

dont mean to criticise but it doesnt sound like your after much power so money spend on that plenum could go to a fuel pump or oil cooler, something thats going to make an actual contribution to the motor.

my 2c.

wouldnt going for a front facing plenum greatly improve boost response ? As there is maybe a metre of intercooler piping eliminated assuming you would have went the pipe across the radiator layout which seems most common. I would think that max power wouldnt improve at all however drivability should be noticably improved...

front facing plenum on a rb20 wont benefit the motor, you better off spending

180 on a wasted spark ignition system

70 on a good oil cooler

some adjustable cam gears

up and over intercooler kit with a good size front mount

this will benefit your gtst better then any front facing plenum

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...