Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys got a staggy series 2 engine in the 32 gts4 at the moment. Was running pretty well with gt2871 turbo s15 injectors q45 afm and remapped ecu... took these all out and put it back to standard and now its having massive problems starting.

Car currently has:

Front feed plenum with larger throttle body

Rb25 neo afm

Series 1 afm (engine is series 2 but people have told me it doesnt matter)

Series 2 coil packs

stock rb25 injectors

Stock turbo

These are the onyl things that have been replaced

Its struggling to start.. have got it started a couple of times but runs like dog shit.

Plugged a power fc in .. still ran like shit and struggled to start.. obviously tuned differently but ..

Have injector pulse.. have spark..

Plugs foul up very quickly.. cleaned them numerous times..

Pull the cas out and spin it and injectors click.. not completely fluently but still click...

So given that.. im really not sure where to go from here

Any ideas would be much appreciated

if the stock ecu has been remapped to suit s15 injectors and q45

and you put the stock parts back in, it will run like a bucket of crap

likewise with the powerfc - i would expect same results

overfuelling, mega rich and just a boggy tune

my advice would be to put the PFC in and DATA INIT to factory defaults

then it should start first stop providing you have factory afm and injectors

if the stock ecu has been remapped to suit s15 injectors and q45

and you put the stock parts back in, it will run like a bucket of crap

likewise with the powerfc - i would expect same results

overfuelling, mega rich and just a boggy tune

my advice would be to put the PFC in and DATA INIT to factory defaults

then it should start first stop providing you have factory afm and injectors

or get yourself a standard s2 r33 ecu for 150 or so

well the best way is to list all the possible alternatives, then to cancel them out 1 by 1 effectively till you find out what it is. Now could it be theres not enough petrol?

Yeah heaps of fuel in the tank

Been told series 1 ecu should work but im having my doubts

an rb20det ecu was remapped.. but that has been removed and replaced by a stock series 1 ecu no remap

S1 no go with the coils you have

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...