Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey forum have a lil problem with my 95 gts-t and was seeeking the help of the forum to try and solve it? Ok here it is, was installing a z32 airflow meter into my car followed all the steps of the tutorial to a tee and when I went to fire it up it didnt start. So I changed the settings in the afc neo to 2 in 4 out still nothing. After trying to start it for a while i decided to put back in the old airflow meter and when i wired it up the air flow monitor on the neo went str8 to 100%. Tried to start it and nothing. Put the z32 back in and he same thing is happening with that as well the monitor reads 100% as soon as I put the ignition to on. When I play with the wires it drops and jumps back and forth but I can never get to remain on zero were it suppose to b. Now i cant even get my car started and wanted to kno if ne1 on the forum has any solutions for me. All help is appreciated. Thanks!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/
Share on other sites

Please link to which tute your using. Sounds like an wiring issue and your feeding 5v straight into the loom side signal wire, hence showing 100%.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fi...html&hl=z32

Thats the tute I am using. I am wiring my car using the series 2 wiring tutorial. I have the three wires so I have to join wires three and four on the z32 and, well the rest is in the tutorial as I stated when i play with the wires it drops down and sometimes fluctuates up and down but for the most part it remains on 100% and the car doesnt start. So what do you suggest I switch the wires around cause I tried to put the standard afm back and the same thing happened as well. Afc neo reads 100% and car wont start and all the wires match up cause its the original afm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3904069
Share on other sites

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fi...html&hl=z32

...as I stated when i play with the wires it drops down and sometimes fluctuates up and down but for the most part it remains on 100% and the car doesnt start.

By play, do you mean wiggle around? If the output is fluctuating when your just moving the wires around, you must have a dodgy connection. Check the pins of the plug your using maybe? Sounds odd. Does the bender need to be told the type of AFM installed?

Did the car start before you swapped plugs over, as if it did, and now your have wired the STD AFM back in exactly the same fashion... you might have killed something.

EDIT: I notice power and signal are similar colors, red and orange with black trace. That would (i think) give 100% output if you accidentally mixed em up.

Edited by GeeTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3904097
Share on other sites

By play, do you mean wiggle around? If the output is fluctuating when your just moving the wires around, you must have a dodgy connection. Check the pins of the plug your using maybe? Sounds odd. Does the bender need to be told the type of AFM installed?

Did the car start before you swapped plugs over, as if it did, and now your have wired the STD AFM back in exactly the same fashion... you might have killed something.

EDIT: I notice power and signal are similar colors, red and orange with black trace. That would (i think) give 100% output if you accidentally mixed em up.

Ok will definitely check wiring again and yes when i say play I mean wiggle around and it is the type of bender that you have to put the number in, its an afc neo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3905060
Share on other sites

Ok I cleaned the afm and made sure all the wires match up, the afc neo now reads 0% for the afm monitoring feature it has and i got the car to start but it only turned over for like 2 seconds after holding the ignition on for like 4 to 5 seconds then it just died. I tried to get it to start again but it wont. Any other ideas I can try or of what's wrong? I should not have to lean the meter out in order to start the car`right?Thanks for the help so far guys.

Edited by Daboss
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3905222
Share on other sites

Was a fluke its not fixed as soon as i turned the car over it started then the afm signal went str8 to 100% and it died. I wired and rewired and no matter what I do as soon as the all the wires are connected the signal jumps str8 to 100% and my car wont start. Does ne1 have a solution for me?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3906485
Share on other sites

Ok after about an hour of troubleshooting this is what I came up with. I disconnected the airflow meter and the car started but as you kno ya can't drive around with it like that, so i disconnected the two wires for the afc neo that monitor and control the afm voltage. Now when I turn the car on and touch the signal wire ofI also used the afm to the signal monitor wire of the neo it reads 100% voltage thats with no motor running. Now with the car running as soon as I connect the signal wire(no neo connected) this is connecting the original wire back to the ecu the car dies. I tried it wih the z32 afm as well and the same thing, could this mean that point on the ecu is shorted? Cus i would refuse to believe that both afm are faulty and the original worked right before i tried to put in the z32. The car starts and everything so the ecu isnt totally fried just as soon as the afm is connected it cant start anymore or if I have it started it dies. Oh I forgot to mention that for testin purposes i used some spare wire that I had, just to make sure it wasn't anything wrong with the wiring running back to the ecu. So do you think that its that point on the ecu board itself thats been shorted?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3909489
Share on other sites

"touching wires" while the cars electrical system is turned on? To be brutally honest, your AFM install attempt and testing procedure reads like chaos. I think you should start warming to the idea, that theres a distinct possibility uv killed the sensitive AD input on the ECU. I'd revert to stock AFM and test with a known good ECU.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3909834
Share on other sites

"touching wires" while the cars electrical system is turned on? To be brutally honest, your AFM install attempt and testing procedure reads like chaos. I think you should start warming to the idea, that theres a distinct possibility uv killed the sensitive AD input on the ECU. I'd revert to stock AFM and test with a known good ECU.
Flash the ECU for codes... I bet it gives an ID 107 error...

Seriously, it's your wiring.

How are you joining the wires? Twist and tape?

Well at first i was crimping them but when it didnt work, as I didn't want to keep cutting the wires back I then started twisting and taping for trouble shooting only. The only wire I touched while the electrical system was on is the signal wire to the neo it wasnt even connected to the ecu as i disconnected the input wire from the neo to the ecu, before I cut the car on power and ground were always connected I only touched the signal wire to the monitoring wire of the neo and kept gettin 100%. When I checked the ecu error code I got 12 and thats it and that error code is for the airflow meter but no matter which airflow meter i connect the z32 or the original I get 100% voltage reading. Whats an error code 107 I don't know that one? So as you said I need to get another ecu and maybe airflow meter and test from there.

Edited by Daboss
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221405-air-flow-meter/#findComment-3910737
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...