Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what should my car run E/T with good grip

R32 gtst mods are rb25 conversion ,fmic 600,300,70 hypergear kit ,turbo back exhaust 3"

blitz bov pod with cold air intake with head light out 12 psi with turbosmart boost T

tyes 255/40/17

should it do low 13

what do you guys think about a 12.9

i bet a typhoon they run 13.7 stock

Edited by RB SANDY
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222538-what-should-my-car-run-et/
Share on other sites

u could look at a mid 13 to low 13 u mite be pushing any 12 but it all the driver and a good take off u could hav 2 drivers same car 1 get a 15 1 get a 13 so noone could giv u a good answer but the car should be capable of a mid 13

it is a how to guide but it is the driver. u could get a better time but have more power in a lighter car your next prob is traction. i got a 32 gtst when i ran mine had about 190 rwkw and ran a 13.5 but bad traction launched at to high revs. does the how 2 guide tell u what to launch at because what if 2 drivers do differant launch 1 at 4g and 1 at 7g they both goin to get 13.4. it just doesnt make sense but best way is run it u mite surprise yourself and get a 12 i hope u do. just run it a thew times each launch at diff revs to test it out

lol 40 profile on 17inch rims is only gonna get your mates going "pwoaahh sandy you got no traction down the quater" lol, get some nice street/racing slicks, and then what ever you run will only improve on the launching department, as your traction department will be covered...

when you do end up taking it out, post your time on here. i keep meaning to take mine out, but little things just keep going wrong.

got a boost leak at the moment.

before that it was the rear camber

and before that it was the clutch

and so on and so on.

never anything major, but enough to keep me away from the track.

my younger bro ran a 13.3 with simular mods to you in a r33 with a 2.0s 60 foot time.

If you can drive it hard and launch it well (his tyres were shit so theres no reason why you can better his 60 foot time), theres a good chance for a very low 13 pass. Put slicks on and launch it hard and a high 12 should be on the cards.

Edited by R34GTFOUR

I'd say mid 13's should be on the cards at least - From what i remember a few years back when i got a seat in that thing it was mighty quick and had me smiling for a while :happy: BTW, I'm your mate Steve's cousin if you remember.

I'm hoping to tap into the 13's with my car:

stock RB20

+ 3" split dump&front / high-flow cat / 3.5" cat-back

+ FMIC

+ bosch 040 pump

+ APexi power intake

+ remap (boost restrictor/speedcut removed + ignition timing advanced with new fuel map)

160kw atw before remap, was quoted a 10-15kw gain after remap & between 10-12 pound ATM - car running extremely well.

Cheers,

Steve.

years ago when my 32 had an rb25 with 190rwkw std rb25det unknown ks 3in turbo back, pwr intercooler,microtech ecu 11-14psi no difference. run between 13.2 to 13.4 all day on 225 street tyres 108mph i think.would just break into a 12 with m/t street slicks id say

got walbro myself. nice and quiet, and also reaches to the bottom of the tank, so can use the full tank of fuel, as oposed to 3/4 of it.

as soon as i find this damn boost leak, will take my car down to the quarter. expecting mid to high 13's....

at the moment replacing the front bushes, so won't be fixing the leak for at least a month or so. budget just does not allow it.

You wont need 230 at all.

I ran 12.9's @ 109mph all day long (lots of practice and i was very consistent back in the day)

And that was with 220rwkw, RB25 in a car over 1400kg (HR31 GTSR)

This was using 225 Simex tyres, nothing special, nothing thick.

R32 is lighter by a reasonable margin, it should be able to do it with 200rwkw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...