Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a T78 with rb30/26 in a BNR32

looking to make a custom 4" exhaust from turbo back.

question is..should i include a muffler or should i make it stright out.

disadvantage ?

and i guess i'll be using 321 SS stainless steel from burns

any thoughts or experience on that ?

should i also use heat wrap on this tubing ?

i see that on Burns Stainess's page, they have many selection of mufflers like

DR-1 Drag muffler

mufflerpic1_150.gif

and

Ultra Light muffler

SSmuf-2.gif

also using oval tubings. what's the effect of this ?

is it just for more ground clearence ?

straight_x3.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222686-custom-4-exhaust-help/
Share on other sites

I would certainly be using a muffler and making sure it is straight through and at least maintains the exh id... that is assuming you dont mind the noise. If you do want to quieten it down, as an example a mate with a 4" has two rather large straight through magnaflow race series mufflers and that is imo very quiet at light throttle/cruise, as opposed to my 3.5" with a single 4" muffler which is deafening no matter what your doing.

btw that drag muffler is a merge collector design for aspirated drag motors (ie straight of headers)

Hey,

With that turbo and a 4" straight-through I'd guess you'd be at about 110-115dB. That's pretty loud.

You might want to have a listen to something that loud before you decide to do it; if you're

getting a full custom system done you'll save a lot of time and effort (and money) if you decide on

the configuration before you start :P They go harder with less muffling; but you can probably knock

10dB off that with minimal flow restriction, and another 8dB with only a little more restriction.

I'd probably try to get it down to about 95 using the best flow-vs-noise tradeoff mufflers you can find.

Below that mark on 4" I think you will notice the difference.

No experience with that vendor of stainless. I think you have to weld 321 with 347 so that may be a concern.

Heat wrap: no idea; I'd probably wrap the manifold but not worry about the exh. side. It's a _big_ pipe.

The oval tube is for more height clearance - you have more width + less height used, but similar area.

Hard to do 'the bends of your choice' with it though because it's indexed.

Round is easier, and you can fit a round 4" under a 32 with 100mm clearance everywhere

at SK's suspension GB ride height (minor relief needed when passing over the rear driveshaft area).

Regards,

Saliya

I use 304 for 2 reasons, 1 is cost, 2 is for availability of the material and bends, flanges.

I can often buy ALL the bends and straight right off the shelf!

Cracking is usually tracked back to thermal stress. Often where 2 pipes meet and they are running at different temps and/or lengths.

Like dump pipe and waste-gate join. Make sure you add a flexi-pipe! If in doubt, check out any decent GTR front pipes!

I wrapped my pipe until it had left the engine bay..

Help ya any?

I use 304 for 2 reasons, 1 is cost, 2 is for availability of the material and bends, flanges.

I can often buy ALL the bends and straight right off the shelf!

Cracking is usually tracked back to thermal stress. Often where 2 pipes meet and they are running at different temps and/or lengths.

Like dump pipe and waste-gate join. Make sure you add a flexi-pipe! If in doubt, check out any decent GTR front pipes!

I wrapped my pipe until it had left the engine bay..

Help ya any?

i thought flexy pipe was a good idea..but some say it's not important and it's only important on FWD cars.....but gtr has FWD too...

I use 304 for 2 reasons, 1 is cost, 2 is for availability of the material and bends, flanges.

I can often buy ALL the bends and straight right off the shelf!

Cracking is usually tracked back to thermal stress. Often where 2 pipes meet and they are running at different temps and/or lengths.

Like dump pipe and waste-gate join. Make sure you add a flexi-pipe! If in doubt, check out any decent GTR front pipes!

I wrapped my pipe until it had left the engine bay..

Help ya any?

your lucky.. i have to order all mine in majority of the time

3" - 300rwkw

3.5" - 350rwkw

4" - 400rwkw+

Thats a 'general' rule for exhaust size.

Yeah a 3" will 'flow' 350rwkw, but put a 3.5" on there and you'll see the benefits right away.

You can easily get two mufflers, plenty of places sell 4" ones these days, plentiful on the market.

Will still flow brilliantly and have a nice note, without being a massive noise/drone box

I would be trying to thinner in wall thickness then 1.6wt. Way too heavy for an exhaust, maybe the dump pipe and front pipe will be fine in 1.6mm, but after the cat you can drop it back to 1.2mm

thinnest my supplier has is 1.6 in 4inch and 3.5.. can do 3inch in 1.2 tho if your that concerned about weight.. you can go titanium.. but that will cost an arm and a leg...

3" - 300rwkw

3.5" - 350rwkw

4" - 400rwkw+

Thats a 'general' rule for exhaust size.

Yeah a 3" will 'flow' 350rwkw, but put a 3.5" on there and you'll see the benefits right away.

You can easily get two mufflers, plenty of places sell 4" ones these days, plentiful on the market.

Will still flow brilliantly and have a nice note, without being a massive noise/drone box

Seen enough ~400RWKW cars, with ZERO gain from a 3" to 4" exhaust...

Seen enough ~400RWKW cars, with ZERO gain from a 3" to 4" exhaust...

Of course a car with no mufflers, ext gates not plumbed etc etc will do it.

Road cars, with a level of noise legality surrounding noise, ride height and so on, simply not going to happen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
    • For race cars, this is one part where I find having the roll cage bar having gone through a hole in the floor better than the build it up on a ledge inside... The Merc I help on, the main hoop ends are marked on the car, and the jack is marked... Jack goes under a few inches and lifts one whole side of the car up... Removes that fight for long slim jacks for race car duties!   My biggest issue for the daily drivers I work on, is my jacks don't go high enough. The jacks start out on a few blocks, jack it up, then start a second jack under it on more blocks, and then I can get an axle stand under it. My axle stands are presently in use, and are nearly fully extended. The car is sitting with barely more than a cm of clearance to get the wheel off the studs! Sarah's Kluger is the same, as it has an ungodly amount of droop available in the suspension and a distinct lack of good jacking points!
    • Happy? Yep, my to do list is getting shorter and shorter. Either this light approaching is the end of the tunnel, or I'm about to be hit by a train... Ha ha ha   Also, Duncan isn't that far out of town that you need to make a multi day drive out of it. 😛
    • Sorry I meant that we are building the EH for a client.
    • LOL, when one "money pit" is never enough Noice, and excellent work mate
×
×
  • Create New...