Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 347
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest MFX_R33

Hopefully that should spread the crowd out a bit more, and we can get a few more runs in then.

Another thing that would be good to see is a Saturday night meeting similar to the ones held in the US, to give the guy's at the illegal runs somewhere to go. i think the ones over there are just 1/8th mile, which may be easier to control, and I think that it could actually be a profitable venture for them as well considering the numbers racing on the street now.

Jeff.

Jeff,

Brett and I ran the first run @ 6:46pm, 2nd @ 8:08pm, 3rd @ 9:11pm and 4th @ 9:55pm.

4 runs in one night with just over 3 hours racing total and down to one lane for half an hour. Very impressive!

Adrian

Jeff,

Brett and I ran the first run @ 6:46pm, 2nd @ 8:08pm, 3rd @ 9:11pm and 4th @ 9:55pm.

4 runs in one night with just over 3 hours racing total and down to one lane for half an hour.  Very impressive!

Adrian

Yeah, was great. I got 4 runs in too and unlike you guys I wasn't the first in stage :)

I imagine that without the 1 and a half hour + rain delay we may well have got 5 runs.

Am I right in saying that there was only the one blow up? (the 180)

For those that care I ran:

best ET 13.4, 6ft 1.82, mph 100 (pulsar GTI-R, first ever drag attempt).

You will love the new track Jeff, it's awesome comming out through the tunnel into the ampitheatre!

Richard

From a spectators p.o.v the cars were moving through much quicker than the old track.

I do believe that being the first night opened and also with the threat of rain that many people would have stayed away.

From a spectators p.o.v the cars were moving through much quicker than the old track.  

 

I do believe that being the first night opened and also with the threat of rain that many people would have stayed away.

Yeah, the staging and stuff all seemed to be working pretty smoothly.

Also, you're right some people (pussies mainly) may have stayed away due to the convenient excuse provided by the rain! j/k :wassup:

Richard

11.18 @ 128mph thats on full slicks though.

So Brett is doing 128 on Nitto's? Would love to see if the other driver/car could replicate that feat on Radials. I'm guessing Brett's car is running more like 482hp, not 500. lol ;-)

Adrian

well, i would be happy with 482 rwhp. Im not too far off lol only like 100+rwhp (im being sarcastic here). We'll see how much soon at our dyno day happening up here in QLD. If i get over 125mph i would be happy. With some more boost i should do it. In its current tune i think 124mph is max. We'll see once i head out again some time in the future if i dont sell it. After all this shit i went through i aint to happy.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you done the Ignition Sync Wizard in the AEM software?
    • Find out what RPM it was idling at with the IACV unplugged. It's very weird that the rpm didn't change at all, and then it stalled. When it stalls is it nearly like a switch off, like you've turned the engine off? Or is it more stutters and sputters and coughs to death over a few seconds? Or does the RPM just slowly keep going down and down? Have you done a test of trying to start it with the AFM unplugged? Does it still die?     If you Follow Josh's advice on using Nistune to check the voltages (which is a perfect method!) if you see anything out of wack voltage wise, THEN get the multimeter out and read the voltage directly at the sensor. If the two vary, then you're now looking for a wiring issue vs a sensor issue. So be aware, what the ECU sees, may not be what the sensor is actually saying too...
    • You very likely need to get it on a dyno and tune it. My assumption is, you've got an RB25DET tune in it, which has a different manifold, different injectors, and different cams as a minimum. What O2 sensor are you running?   When you say it runs extremely rich from idle all the way to redline, is this just free revving it you see that?
    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
×
×
  • Create New...