Jump to content
SAU Community

Dyno Results

boosted_32

By boosted_32,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

cooldude1000 Rookie

cooldude1000

Posted
Posted

ok. i've checked out both the original power graph and the new one. even on the old graph the car still wasn't running lean. i think its amazing that all you armchair mechanics can pass all these comments without even seeing the car or working on it to know what its doin and what power its making in relation to air/fuel and boost pressure. maybe you guys hould think less about how much boost pressure its making and be more concerned about the power output!!!!!

THE PAINT MAN Newbie

THE PAINT MAN

Posted
Posted
ok. i've checked out both the original power graph and the new one. even on the old graph the car still wasn't running lean. i think its amazing that all you armchair mechanics can pass all these comments without even seeing the car or working on it to know what its doin and what power its making in relation to air/fuel and boost pressure. maybe you guys hould think less about how much boost pressure its making and be more concerned about the power output!!!!!

i have to agree with cooldude! how can you no what that particular engine needs from your computer seats?

Adriano Grand Master

Adriano

Posted
Posted

Attack of the noobs. How many cars have you personally dyno tuned from base tune? FYI when you are tuning a car, you basically dont look at the power output, whatever it makes, it makes. If its down 50kw at the end, its either mechanical or the tune.

cooldude1000 Rookie

cooldude1000

Posted
Posted

what exactly is a 'noob'? or are you just guessing that its a word just like you are guessing about what the tune for this car should be. its pretty easy for all you guys to hang shit on people for doing their job when its possible you wouldn't know one end of spanner from the other

nizmonut Community Regular

nizmonut

Posted
Posted (edited)
i hope you have more then 700hp at the rear wheels?
.

yeah just a little under 900 at all four wheels and losing traction. how bout yourself? :)

oh and cooldude1000...the spanner you need at the momment is a size suitable for you.....6 millimeter au't to do it...it'll have to do cause i dont have one smaller that you can borrow. .........noob.

Edited by nizmonut
nitestalkr Enthusiast

nitestalkr

Posted
Posted
what exactly is a 'noob'? or are you just guessing that its a word just like you are guessing about what the tune for this car should be. its pretty easy for all you guys to hang shit on people for doing their job when its possible you wouldn't know one end of spanner from the other

I know your a spanner.. does that count?

THE PAINT MAN Newbie

THE PAINT MAN

Posted
Posted
.

yeah just a little under 900 at all four wheels and losing traction. how bout yourself? :)

oh and cooldude1000...the spanner you need at the momment is a size suitable for you.....6 millimeter au't to do it...it'll have to do cause i dont have one smaller that you can borrow. .........noob.

WHOW!! you should be really proud of yourself you actually no ther is a 6mill spanner nice work, you must be a mechanic i wouldnt hang shit for all you no he might be a dyno tuner!!!

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Who cares if he is? I wouldn't take my car too him based on his comments below

ok. i've checked out both the original power graph and the new one. even on the old graph the car still wasn't running lean. i think its amazing that all you armchair mechanics can pass all these comments without even seeing the car or working on it to know what its doin and what power its making in relation to air/fuel and boost pressure. maybe you guys hould think less about how much boost pressure its making and be more concerned about the power output!!!!!

Go look at the comments, and by whom they are posted. People with a substantial more than armchair experience.

Some have tuned cars with over 300rwkw from scratch, some full engine builds, some full engine conversions and so on.

If you try and say that first graph, the car isn't running lean with a AFR of 14.25:1, then you sir are an nothing more than a fool

Posts in this thread are about the poor AFR ratio and the average midrange that is associated with it, that is directly correlated to boost control issues or something else as it has a fairly wonky dip in there that should not be there.

THE PAINT MAN Newbie

THE PAINT MAN

Posted
Posted
Who cares if he is? I wouldn't take my car too him based on his comments below

Go look at the comments, and by whom they are posted. People with a substantial more than armchair experience.

Some have tuned cars with over 300rwkw from scratch, some full engine builds, some full engine conversions and so on.

If you try and say that first graph, the car isn't running lean with a AFR of 14.25:1, then you sir are an nothing more than a fool

Posts in this thread are about the poor AFR ratio and the average midrange that is associated with it, that is directly correlated to boost control issues or something else as it has a fairly wonky dip in there that should not be there.

lol

THE PAINT MAN Newbie

THE PAINT MAN

Posted
Posted

dear dick face look up what the stockometric air fuel ratio is for a stock engine is!! you must be the f**k wit that owns a black car that dosent show up particulate matter(hydrocarbons) which is unburnt fuel!!! all over you bumper bar.

cooldude1000 Rookie

cooldude1000

Posted
Posted

its obvious that you want to be running a richer than stoich when your producing bulk power but the numbers these guys are talking about are ridiculous. these guys still need to find out what the stoich afr is and then go and re-check your figures and then maybe you can pull your dicks out of each others asses finally

GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted (edited)

This thread has become immensely entertaining :)

These are my fav bits... completely nonsensical...

dear dick face look up what the stockometric air fuel ratio is for a stock engine is!!
...these guys still need to find out what the stoich afr is and then go and re-check your figures...

Really, the best bit, is one guy with 3 posts, agreeing with another 3 poster... both of which joined 1 day apart... *cough* IP check

i have to agree with cooldude!
Edited by GeeTR
Cubes Grand Master

Cubes

Posted
Posted
its obvious that you want to be running a richer than stoich when your producing bulk power but the numbers these guys are talking about are ridiculous. these guys still need to find out what the stoich afr is and then go and re-check your figures and then maybe you can pull your dicks out of each others asses finally

cooldude/paintman... Why do you feel the need to make personal attacks?

Peak torque is made as the afr's spike to 14:1. Not good.

Simple as that.

So pull your head in and discuss not attack.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wazmond
      WGNC34 Rear springs

      By Wazmond · Posted

      Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • AdiR34
      Fender flare widths across front/back of car

      By AdiR34 · Posted

      Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • GTSBoy
      Stagea Front CV Axle Question

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • GTSBoy
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • dbm7
      Stock rb25det neo questions

      By dbm7 · Posted

      All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...