Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am currently using a 3.5 inch exhaust from the cat back on my r33 s2, it hangs down to low with clearance of only 75mm, Is this exhaust to big for the rb25det. What size would be better suited to the car and what type of performance and sound levels are being acheived.

Mod so far are

FMIC, Microtech lt12, Turbosmart Eboost 2, Split fire coils.

Any help with this would be very helpfull.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224564-best-size-exhaust/
Share on other sites

is it just a custom job exhaust?

or is it actually a brand design exhaust?

maybe check the rubber linkage that hold the exhaust in-place..

happen'd to my old car..one fell-out and i was movin all-around..lol

but didnt drop low at all from wat i can remba....

also mayb take a photo???

Hey Newboost,

The 3.5inch cat back exhaust your using isnt to big for the stock Rb25 turbo. Although if its riding to low and your looking for a change, a 3inch system from the turbo back would be the best option. Would give you a good performance gain and would also sound nice. If you dont mind it riding low and just looking for performance than the 3.5inch cat back will be fine. You will just need to get a 3inch Dump/Front pipe and a 3inch Hi-Flow cat.

:ninja:

I do have a 3 " dump pipe and hi flow cat, It is a brand system not a custom job. (Xforce exhaust system) Has anyone got 3 " system from Liverpool Exhuast in sydney. The sales guy told me that if i was to use his setup i shold get an extra 15 to 25 rwkw or he just trying for the extra sale.

If only you were in WA i would swap my 3 inch x force for the 3.5, its fairly new too.

That liverpool dude is full of it

Out of interest off topic how do you like your eboost 2 i too have one. I have read great things about them but when i took it to xspeed they were "oh you got one of those and chuckled"

Edited by Pattygtst

on the subject of the eboost2 i have also got mixed answers when it comes to getting it tuned correctly. I have not yet found any one that seems to know how to set it up correctly. everyone who has has had a go has managed to set up only half and i am still looking for a good tuner in the Melbourne area. I have gone to Pro Maz for tuning and found to have some problems in the way they setup the overboost settings and it is not holding peak boost levels.

well just ring around and ask if they are familar with the eboost 2, maybe even talk to turbosmart apparently they are very helpful

Xspeed apparently got a guy from turbosmart flown over to there workshop to show them how to do it. They also said that they tested it compared to the blitz profec spec2 and that apparently held boost better. I dont know but mine holds very well,

They say it all comes down to how good the solenoid is. HKS apparently have the best one.

But if you check out alot of car mags there wild about the eboost 2

I guess it just comes down to the tuner

  • 3 years later...

3.5 inch is only good when your running a lot of power like 300 kw isnt it?

Is this true? Is there a direct relationship between power output and exhaust size, in turbo applications?

Car's getting a high-flow cat and back including piping tomorrow, excluding the rear muffler which is already 3", should I go to 3" for the piping, or keep it 2.5", keeping in mind it's still using a stock dump and front pipes.

Car is a 25DE+T with R34 turbo, doubt i'll be running 9psi any time soon, and given that a standard GTST exhaust can flow that, should a custom 2.5" one do it also?

What is the standard piping size of a GTST front-pipe? As I can't measure right now...

get a 3 inch for sure bud..

standard nissan cats are pretty good youd be better to invest 200$ in one of these

http://justjap.com/store/product.php?productid=17317

they make a shitload of difference to the feel of the car, you wont regret :thumbsup:

Cheers for the reply.

I was keen on 2.5" to keep noise down, but with a *very* long term power goal of around ~220rwkw, didn't know which way to go. Given i'm still running the N/A cat, centre pipe and centre muffler I think even 2.5" would be an improvement.

What size is the standard dumo/front pipes on a 33 GTST? (what's currently on the car) As I don't see much point going bigger?

To the OP - if you have 3.5in on now keep it - yes 3in would do for now but no point in changing it just secure it a bit better if its hanging down. You may be glad of it later if your power ambitions grow like most people's do!

You can get a 3" exhaust legal with two large as possible mufflers and a CAT.

So there is no issue there if it is built right.

Some off-shelf jap exhausts that are quiet - are not a "true" 3" either. They have restrictors inside them to get them quiet. Some brands have made under 90dB either way, but you can certainly do it without the restriction.

You can get a 3" exhaust legal with two large as possible mufflers and a CAT.

So there is no issue there if it is built right.

Some off-shelf jap exhausts that are quiet - are not a "true" 3" either. They have restrictors inside them to get them quiet. Some brands have made under 90dB either way, but you can certainly do it without the restriction.

dont even need two large mufflers to make 3" legal. mines got a hot dog muffler and a large oval muffler and its legal (as tested by the RTA).

What dB @ what RPM?

I always talk in Vic laws - 90dB @ 4700rpm for a RB25 (from around 40cm away)

tad over 3500rpm 89dB @ a little over 3500rpm and 50cm (45 degrees from exhaust tip). if i was to take it to 4700 im not sure if it would pass but its only a 16x11x6 muffler and you can fit an 18x12x8 in the back comfortably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...