Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently put a microtech in my r32 gts-4, the car is all finished and up and running, but the 4wd system isnt working. It has the 3 lights on 4wd, hi-cas, and anti-lock. its the same as if you pulled the 4wd fuse in a gtr (yes i checked the fuse - and its fine)

can anyone point me in the right direction? has wiring diagrams? or can give me a hand(brisbane- northside)?

Cheers

55yko

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224583-r32-gts4-microtech-wiring-issue/
Share on other sites

I recently put a microtech in my r32 gts-4, the car is all finished and up and running, but the 4wd system isnt working. It has the 3 lights on 4wd, hi-cas, and anti-lock. its the same as if you pulled the 4wd fuse in a gtr (yes i checked the fuse - and its fine)

can anyone point me in the right direction? has wiring diagrams? or can give me a hand(brisbane- northside)?

Cheers

55yko

u need to hook the tps signal wire from the attessa ecu upto the tps signal on the ecu (tee in the wire), i dont know what wire is the one as i dont have a gtr but it will be in the front near the ecu and coming from a big plug that runs to the rear of the car, im sure someone on here will have the colour or a diagram to help :D

u need to hook the tps signal wire from the attessa ecu upto the tps signal on the ecu (tee in the wire), i dont know what wire is the one as i dont have a gtr but it will be in the front near the ecu and coming from a big plug that runs to the rear of the car, im sure someone on here will have the colour or a diagram to help :D

I totally rewired the TPS for the microtech. so i assume then i need to run a wire from the tps to the attessa computer?

I totally rewired the TPS for the microtech. so i assume then i need to run a wire from the tps to the attessa computer?

yes but you need a buffer circuit as the tps signal to the Microguess will be affected by the ATTESSA i have had something designed and built to compensate this probelm.

yes but you need a buffer circuit as the tps signal to the Microguess will be affected by the ATTESSA i have had something designed and built to compensate this probelm.

Microguess is right :laugh:, do you know what "specifications" each circuit needs to be so i can get a similar unit made up? Cheers for your help

or does anyone know where i can get a "premade" one?

Edited by 55yko

Ok I have the EXACT same problem with a Microtech LT10S running a RB25DET (also the VCT is unplugged and microtech tech support were quite unhelpful on how I go about enabling it, or whether the ECU comes with the bit needed for it) I'd also be looking at some way to run just the Microtech with ATTESSA - It's got plugs on the loom to piggyback the standard GTS4 ECU, but then I'd have to sit it on the passenger side floor :S

I don't have the ABS light coming on though so I assume that works, and I have a HICAS lock bar (light only comes on occasionally when driving at 110km/h on freeways)

yes but you need a buffer circuit as the tps signal to the Microguess will be affected by the ATTESSA i have had something designed and built to compensate this probelm.

mine seems fine so far just hooked straight upto my autronic tps signal, what signs does it show if its not correct?

The attesa ecu needs to recieve 0-3.5v signal for the tps signal, the stock ecu outputs this signal from the 0-5v signal coming from the tps.

I have a link ecu and the voltage coming from the tps is 0.2-3.7v which is pretty close so i just hooked it up and it works fine.

Link use an op-amp with 0.7 gain to modify the signal in their plug in ecu's. You could get somebody to make you one for a case perhaps

If you have a 0-5v tps signal straight onto the attesa ecu, the ecu will think you have 100% throttle when your at 70% which is not really a bad thing, it will bring the 4wd on earlier :P

good info, so whats needed exactly to fix this, i have found a fair bit of understeer when going hard into corners as if 4wd is coming on too early, but not sure if thats normal or not

i have a fix for this

does anyone have a wiring diagram for a gts-4 by any chance (engine and attessa would be nice :D )?

engine diagrams are identical gtst/4 the see this thread, contact the member for a copy of the manual on cd.

you need to download the gtr wiring diagrams. i dont have them on me anymore, but on the biggest diagram, the plus is in the bottom left, i think its called wc3. you have to blow up the pics and print them out on a3 and you can nearly read thw colours, but you can follow the lines from the plug to the end of the wire.

There is a page just for the attesa/abs ecu, you can use a multi meter on the correct pin on the ecu and a long wire back to the cabin to find the correct wire.

i have a fix for this

i noticed that in your first post, hence i asked what exactly do i do or what do i need to buy or what do u want to sell me? :D

and a price would be good if u have got something for sale to fix it. I would like this asap as i have a track day soon and understeer sucks.

ok update, what i need is the attessa pin out, im going to run a wire from the microtech tps 0-5v wire.

I just looked to see whether the attessa was spitting out any error codes and the led was not flashing at all. made me think because if it was TPS it would be throwing code 21 shouldn't it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...