Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You're right slip, that's the price you pay, it's always a gamble doing things like this. Can be a very dangerous one, but that copper was a jerk. Instead of saying do you know how dangerous it is, oh no, big noteing his big V8 commonwhore. He's got ya anyway, might as well let him know what you think.

Guest Boxhead

im with nizman here,

its not like any of use have ever not broken the rules.. im sure everyone on here has done something illegal, no matter how small or big.. it was still done...

just because some have luck with police and some dont , ohwell..

anyway bad luck chook, you can now join my no liscence club, haha i think being poor and not paying fine is working for me(in nsw you gotta pay fines for pts to work)

serves ya right is about all that can be said, u do the crime u do the time. what did you expect? a big rant thread on how cops are revenue raising? or how they could spend the resources elsewhere?

unfortunatly there is a section in the police force known as the "traffic branch" its their job to buttf**k members of the comunity who are in a rush or need to get somewhere without concentraiting on the speedo, nothing else.

sittin round in tears and writing "cops suck" on the walls isnt gonna change much.

these rant threads have been done to death. in the old days u could get away with a 70 dollar fine or something for doin a skid, no points, so u could go all night if you had enough money and tyres and not enough brains.

as for the verbal crap u copped

my copper said "yer right, you were doin more than that, we were struggling to keep up"

he also said "p-plater" in a scornfull tone, mocked me by asking "is this your car" and then finished the whole 5 star affair with "thats the end of ya licence mate, go home and stay there"

100 in a 60 zone is a fairly high speed to be caught for anyway man

actually F**k tony "kneejerker" mcgravy and peter "look at me" beattie

they are the ones who changed the points system, and introduced tougher penalties ect. its all part of the suck up to the "older voter" and the "poor dicks who build houses on main roads and expect a quiet nights sleep" plan

still, bad luck chook, ur not the only one tho, and 33s are the police flavour of the month atm.

i have just over a month to go :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...