Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this is the billion one I'm looking at:

http://au.billion.com/product/wireless/bipac7300n.php

this is the linksys (looks ok, but I'm a bit sceptical of internal antena)

http://www-au.linksys.com/servlet/Satellit...d=8505069027B02

this is the netgear offering. looks pretty decent.

http://www.netgear.com.au/Products/Routers...ys/DGN2000.aspx

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Netgear has lifted their game a lot over the past few years.

What 'config' of yours was the Linksys not handling BB?

Tell me you are actually going to secure your shit this time :banana:

lol, yeah being in an apartment buidling I may secure this network. hehe I figure I spend a lot of time stealing unsecured wireless, so why not share the wealth at home with my neigbours!

the config problem was something to do with having a static IP and one other setting I had (can't remember which) basically it wouldn't let me have both a static IP and this other setting at the same time. the belkin was the same too, so I guess that particular account set-up I had was a bit unique. but the netgear let me do it.

i find harris technology on epping road usually has pretty good prices for some of the stuff I get there.. but havent really been buying stuff for a few years other than little bits and pieces I need when some thing breaks.

hmm, any suggestions of internet stores gratefully recieved too.

Sam, yeah I've been fairly happy with HHT.

as for how I post I just hop in the car and drve around till I get a good unsecured signal. :banana:

and I right in saying that the http://au.billion.com/product/wireless/bipac5200n.php would be just as good for my purposes as the http://au.billion.com/product/wireless/bipac7300n.php ?

It seems like the 7300 just has more features that I wont use. All I want is an ADSL2+ model and a wireless router all in one, that is good enough for me to use 2 pcs and a PS3 with decent speeds.

cheers that site is good. I think I might go tight and can the N idea and go with G. My PS3 is G anyway and I don't know if I can be farked upgrading the card in my PC to a N card, and the laptop has built in G so no way I want to buy an N card for it either. given all that is seems an N router is a waste of time. just need to find a decent G one.

cheers that site is good. I think I might go tight and can the N idea and go with G. My PS3 is G anyway and I don't know if I can be farked upgrading the card in my PC to a N card, and the laptop has built in G so no way I want to buy an N card for it either. given all that is seems an N router is a waste of time. just need to find a decent G one.

Shouldn't N be backwards compatible with 11B and G?

also, where's the good place in sydney to buy this gear cheap?
Richo, if you want to price compare I would be checking out http://staticice.com.au/

I'd suggest the same - StaticIce is good. Unfortunately not every store uses it, though, so some extra running/calling around might still be worth it.

Oh, and Australian PC User states in the current (September) issue that the best ADSL2+ Modem/Routers available at the moment are the Dynalink RTA1025W (for roughly $120) or the Netgear DG834G (for roughly $105).

Shouldn't N be backwards compatible with 11B and G?

yeah it's 100% backwards compatible, but my point is if my PCs card is G, and my PS3 is G and my laptops built in card is G then what's the point of an N router as I'll be limited by the other hardware. or will I still get some benefit with the N router even though I'm using all G gear? maybe increased bandwidth or something?

thanks for the other advice too. you too primordial.

I'd be hesitant to spend extra bucks on a Wireless N router at the moment. The spec for the protocol hasnt been finalised (expected March '09). And while they be morons to finalise a spec that isnt compatible with all of the Wireless N gear thats been sold already - keep in mind that hardware you buy now might not be fully compatible with all future stuff.

Also, be warned if you're buying a new home phone to stop the interference with 2.4GHz cordless phones (same frequency as Wireless A/B/G) - the Wireless N will be on a 5Ghz and/or 2.4ghz frequency range, which may clash with the flashy new 5.8Ghz cordless stuff thats out now. Stick with 1.8Ghz phones as they suffer from the least interference from Wireless networks, Microwaves, etc etc... They have better range and comparable voice quality in most cases anyway.

If the wireless N stuff is only a few bucks more, future proofing might be a way to go. But i wouldnt spend heaps on it at the moment.

I'd be hesitant to spend extra bucks on a Wireless N router at the moment. The spec for the protocol hasnt been finalised (expected March '09). And while they be morons to finalise a spec that isnt compatible with all of the Wireless N gear thats been sold already - keep in mind that hardware you buy now might not be fully compatible with all future stuff.

Also, be warned if you're buying a new home phone to stop the interference with 2.4GHz cordless phones (same frequency as Wireless A/B/G) - the Wireless N will be on a 5Ghz and/or 2.4ghz frequency range, which may clash with the flashy new 5.8Ghz cordless stuff thats out now. Stick with 1.8Ghz phones as they suffer from the least interference from Wireless networks, Microwaves, etc etc... They have better range and comparable voice quality in most cases anyway.

If the wireless N stuff is only a few bucks more, future proofing might be a way to go. But i wouldnt spend heaps on it at the moment.

yeah this is pretty much what I've been thinking. a decent N router and modem is almost double a comparable G router and modem. and like you say they are all built to the draft standard. and again, I don't have any other hardware to take advantage of the increased speed. home phone is not a big problem, I don't bother with a cordless in the apartment, just have 1 plugged in telstra POS.

there seem to be some decent ADSL2+ modems/ wireless G routers now for around $100 which is peanuts really so I think I'll grab one of those and see how we go.

yeah it's 100% backwards compatible, but my point is if my PCs card is G, and my PS3 is G and my laptops built in card is G then what's the point of an N router as I'll be limited by the other hardware. or will I still get some benefit with the N router even though I'm using all G gear? maybe increased bandwidth or something?

thanks for the other advice too. you too primordial.

The benefit is when you go to buy new hardware you wont have to spend money on a new modem as well :banana:

I was gonna mention that in my original post, but forgot...

But yeah, considering 11N still isn't settled, then it might be better to wait. Prices will only come down anyway.

Oh, just as I mentioned that PC User's current issue was the September one, I see that the October issue has just been released, and it has a big comparison of ADSL2+ modems and modem/routers in there. Might be worth checking out...

well after spending a bit of time researching on staticice etc. I've discovered most of the G modem/routers I was interested in are between $85 and $100 and the N ones are between $120 and $130. so considering there is not really much difference in price I think I'll grab an N and give it a go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...