Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Of course its technically possible... he posted how it was done on the very first page.

To do it on a GTR (with twins), not possible.

I realize he did it, they are selling the part on page 11..

why isn't it possible on the gtr tt? everything is possible ... no?

a custom exhaust manifold couldn't combine the exhaust to one then back to

split with a vacuum operated flap? sorry I must be missing something fundamental..

go check out howstuff works and read some information on twin turbocharger applications (and singles for that matter)

then once you have exhausted all avenues and understand the inner-workings youll be able to answer your own application

if you cant be bothered (like most) then read on

nissan set up the GTR for optimal responce, power and balance being a std production car

they would have been able to get all of those from a good twin turbo setup

other cars experiement with Bi-turbo setups, that is, two turbochargers, of different sizes

common applications of this type are the subaru Libery B4

it has one small turbo and one large turbo, a wastegate control value / thingy opens and closes

directing exhaust gas between the turbochargers and so forth

the main problem is a big fat power and torque dip where the changeover point is

in most cases its unavoidable and you just have to deal with it (usually around 4k ish)

if you can avoid the big power dip from the turbocharger changeover then this is a good thing

so the idea of two turbochargers same size and split the engine is half is where the GTR setup comes from

why overcomplicate it and make a bi-turbo setup for no gain and a big dip in power / torque

now usually when you talk bi-turbo setups most guys pipe up and say

but the porsche 900 (or insert random model porsche) runs bi-turbos and it makes 2500BHP at 1500rpm

there is a big difference in engine, cost, research budget and target audience of porsche so dont bother comparing it

in summary

- it sucks

- overcomplicated

- costs

- big power dip during changeover

I realize he did it, they are selling the part on page 11..

why isn't it possible on the gtr tt? everything is possible ... no?

a custom exhaust manifold couldn't combine the exhaust to one then back to

split with a vacuum operated flap? sorry I must be missing something fundamental..

because its explained on the first page, as i said

single turbo, twin scroll... feeding from a manifold single port.

A GTR with twins wont have this. You'd need a HKS T04Z or similar with the split pulse rear (twin scroll) rear housing.

There is no twin scroll housing setup for small twins, mainly because there is no room among other things

if you wanted to run two turbo's of different sizes to get instant torque you could do what a diesal mechanic mate of mine did. he had a land cruiser turbo diesal and sourced a small turbo off a small truck. made up a log style exhaust manifold that both turbo's were bolted to. then instead of running 2 waste gates he then welded up part of the opening of the small turbo so that it could physicaly only have so much gas pass through it. and being a gas it takes the path of least resistance. so it would spool the small turbo up pretty much at idle but once the revs got up it would force the big turbo because it cant push enough through welded up housing. if it spooled to quick he just welded the little turbo a little more, if it spooled to late he took a die grinder to it and opened it a little.

this 4wd ended up being 1 of the most scary things i have ever been in. massive torque massive black smoke out the back with the most unreal turbo noise since the exhaust ended right under the drivers feet. I think this is how some truck's are setup. but then again there must be some reason why this is only done on trucks.

chris

yeah sorry so its a twin scroll housing

well there are two ways to achieve a twin scroll turbocharger setup

1) use a suitable twin scroll housing

- evo lancer has them stock, some of the hi spec garrett units might have (t04z), some of the extreme HKS models might have them etc

- note these are SINGLE turbo setups with twin scroll housings on a single turbo manifold with collectors splitting between each of the 'scrolls' so cylinders 1,2,3 lets say goto scroll 1 and 4,5,6 goto scroll two

2) use a twin turbo setup

using a twin turbo setup is another way of achieve twin scroll setup, but with two turbochargers

two turbochargers std units, two manifolds, cylinders 1,2,3 goto turbo 1 and 4,5,6 goto turbo 2

In my narrow minded opinion sequential turbos are an overly complex (and expensive) way of getting the job done .

The big PITA is having valves open to allow exhaust gas to spin the secondary turbo up and others to not allow pressurised air to back flow through the secondary turbos comp housing till its up to speed .

Subaru tried it - B4 , Mazda series something RX7 , Toyota I think on some 2JZ ? turbo engines ?

I think it was a fad and marketing thing - hey everyone two turbos - twice the fun ....

Thing is a small primary turbo boosts at lowish revs and promises high turbine inlet pressure - at lowish revs .

IMO either a single twin scroll or parallel twins is a better sollution , far less complex and you gain from the pulse separation either way .

Subaru (some JDM STi/Legacy) Mazda (I think S4 RX7) and Mitsubishi (Evo 4-9 and possibly 10) Toyota (some GT4's) have used twin scroll singles with twin integral waste gate flat valves , simpler/cheaper more seamless .

For some strange reason their torque figures in ft/lbs are similar to their Hp numbers and they make a lot of torque in the low to mid range .....

Must be a fluke , A .

from

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=481292

is it technically possible to do what this guy did to his supra?

spool up the first turbo then open up the path to the second..

That’s the second thread on the Supra forums. There is another thread that has been kicking around with links to it from automotive forums all over the world for about a year now. In the other thread they claim to of invented this so called new technology. LOL.

The thing is it has been around for eons. Pretty common on heavy industry turbo’s. Nissan even had something similar on the early VG20’s.

What the guys on the USA Supra forums are doing is modified a twin scroll exhaust housing but it’s not being used in a split pulse application.

They are putting these turbos on open collector manifolds and simply shutting of half the scroll so all the exhaust gasses have to go through one side of the scroll. Effectively halving the A/R of the exhaust housing. Once the turbo is making adequate boost the second half opens and the turbo goes back to the whole A/R.

Example: With a 1.00 A/R Exh Hsg, At low rpm it is a .50 A/R Exh Hsg then once the set boost is reached the second half of the scroll is opened to be a 1.00 A/R Exh Hsg.

This system as been successfully being used in the heavy industry for years so as long as the parts can handle the exhaust temps of a petrol engine there is no reason it can’t work in high performance applications.

Regards,

Ricky.

Shoot me I'm guilty for not reading the links , if I've got this right you mean having a single outlet manifold and a twin entry turbine housing with a means of blocking off one half . Corky has a picture of something of that nature in maximum boost .

Personally I reckon once you have 3 litres to fight with there's no excuse for not making some serious grunt before a turbo starts to wind up . Don't forget a 2JZ is a dedicated 3L 24V DOHC 6 so I imagine to porting/valve area should be better suited to the capacity than say an RB25 or 26 head on an RB30 .

With the fuels and controls around today - plus good manifolds/cams/turbos you should be able to excite some pretty big turbos on that engine . Burning fuels with good anti detonation properties and running lots of advance everywhere should make a 3L 6 pull like a big block at not real big revs . Maybe burn E85 and mist it up with water methanol injection , 9.5 CR 30 lbs of boost and 30 degrees of timing .

Same old same old , contact Geoff Raicer at FullRace because he's developed systems for that car /engine . Not cheap but huge power rarely is .

Dunno what you do for traction in a 2WD Supra , cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...