Jump to content
SAU Community

Unusual Camber Setup? -1.5 Degree Front 0 Degree Rear


Recommended Posts

Guest qtvinsta

Hi all,

Now i just got a wheel alignment done and feel the person who did it may have been fibbing... was it a waste of my money?

background:

I drive a r34 gt-t which had tein flex coilovers installed and car lowered roughly an inch and a half. Now after having this setup for over 3 years i've had enough of the rear wheels wearing out on the inside faster. The front wheels seem to wear more evenly though the inside is probably only slightly more worn but not as bad as the rear.

Two week ago I installed a pair of jjr adjustable rear upper arms and on the weekend put 2 new rear tires.

I thought i'd now get the rear wheels adjusted to have less negative camber.... simple enough thought...

I've just taken to this tyre place (they've been good to me in the past, so i won't mention which one) and all i wanted was to reduce the negative camber in the rear... they said i must align the front too, which i agreed too...

In the end, only the front wheels had adjustments made and the rear wheels were untouched... after requesting the rear to be adjusted and getting resistance i gave up... the mechanic said that the rear was perfect the way it was and that if I wanted it adjusted then i need to have install adjustable front camber too to adjust the rear...

Actually i think i just answered my own question... I couldn't make any sense of what the mechanic said (i realised when I was trying to explain it in the paragraph above!)

I'm quite certain it was probably because the mechanic just feed me some BS to get out of doing more work.

Anyways, that's the reason for the topic title... is it unusal to have a bit of negative camber up front and 0 camber or close to it in the rear?

Any comments? Any recommended place where I can get my rear camber adjusted properly? anywhere between Strathfield and Liverpool is fine with me and surrounding suburbs.

Thanks,

Edited by qtvinsta

Not at all. quite a reasonable setup for a street car imo. I run around 2.5 degrees on the front and 1 on the rear. (both negative) my car does see trackworkand i couldnt be bothered getting an alignment every time i do it. If it wasnt quite so aggressive i would run heaps more but premature wear on the road deters me from doing it.

Guest qtvinsta

yeah I didn't think so either. No need to have the front and rear matching cambers.

Now that I know, I will be able to argue if this happens again...

Question now is whether or not to bring the car back to the same place to get the rear camber adjusted like I had wanted in the first place.

Also complain to the boss about his lazy mechanic. Hopefully not have to pay a second time for something that should have been done already

Maybe just forget them and take it to a reputable place like pedders.

any other reputable places that have experience with adjusting camber kits ?

Hi all,

Now i just got a wheel alignment done and feel the person who did it may have been fibbing... was it a waste of my money?

background:

I drive a r34 gt-t which had tein flex coilovers installed and car lowered roughly an inch and a half. Now after having this setup for over 3 years i've had enough of the rear wheels wearing out on the inside faster. The front wheels seem to wear more evenly though the inside is probably only slightly more worn but not as bad as the rear.

Two week ago I installed a pair of jjr adjustable rear upper arms and on the weekend put 2 new rear tires.

I thought i'd now get the rear wheels adjusted to have less negative camber.... simple enough thought...

I've just taken to this tyre place (they've been good to me in the past, so i won't mention which one) and all i wanted was to reduce the negative camber in the rear... they said i must align the front too, which i agreed too...

In the end, only the front wheels had adjustments made and the rear wheels were untouched... after requesting the rear to be adjusted and getting resistance i gave up... the mechanic said that the rear was perfect the way it was and that if I wanted it adjusted then i need to have install adjustable front camber too to adjust the rear...

Actually i think i just answered my own question... I couldn't make any sense of what the mechanic said (i realised when I was trying to explain it in the paragraph above!)

I'm quite certain it was probably because the mechanic just feed me some BS to get out of doing more work.

Anyways, that's the reason for the topic title... is it unusal to have a bit of negative camber up front and 0 camber or close to it in the rear?

Any comments? Any recommended place where I can get my rear camber adjusted properly? anywhere between Strathfield and Liverpool is fine with me and surrounding suburbs.

Thanks,

Well lets start with the technical stuff;

1. There is no one single right alignment settings for every R34GTT. It depends on what you do with the car, how you drive it, how much power it has, what other suspension modifications it has, what height it is, what tyres etc etc. A simple example, if you use it on the track then 2.5 degrees of negative camber is probably OK on the rear, but if you drive to work on a freeway every day then around 0.75 degrees is better for tyre wear, but if you use it at the drags then you need around 0.5 degrees positive camber. Without sufficient detail no one can tell you what alignment settings you should use.

2. Without the current alignment settings, no one can tell you which direction to go in adjustments. So what are they?

3. Changing only the rear upper control arms is a not a good solution technically speaking, you should adjust the traction arms in tandem with the upper control arms, otherwise you end up with undesireable bump steer (not that any bump steer is ever desireable in a performance car). Maybe that's what the alignment guy was trying to tell you?

4. "lowered roughly an inch and a half", lowered from what? When they role out of the factory they are 390 mm front and 380 mm (centre of wheel to guard). After 1,000 k's or so they settle at 385/375. After 60,000 k's or so they are usually at 380/370. By that time the standard shocks will be stuffed and if they aren't replaced the springs wear out faster and so the car will drop to around 375/365 fairly quickly. So if you are 1.5" (~40mm) lower then you could be at 340/330, which is actually 50 mm (2") lower than when it was new.

There is only one answer, get the tape measure out and measure the height, centre of wheel to guard on all 4 corners, then you will know for sure what height it is. Then we can help you.

Cheers

Gary

Guest qtvinsta

Straight after the 'camber' arm was fitted, I remember saying to myself that it looked as though toe would change if the camber was adjusted. I'm hoping that I won't need to install more like toe rod and traction rod and remove hicas...

Ultimately, I only wanted to have the vehicle sitting slightly lower to the ground. It's my daily ride so I definitely would appreciate longer tyre life, hence why I thought 0 degree rear camber and only slightly negative front camber

I will measure height and post tomorrow.

Cheers,

3. Changing only the rear upper control arms is a not a good solution technically speaking, you should adjust the traction arms in tandem with the upper control arms, otherwise you end up with undesireable bump steer (not that any bump steer is ever desireable in a performance car). Maybe that's what the alignment guy was trying to tell you?

Ok this interests me as i have aftermarket rear upper arms but no aftermarket traction rods. Can you suggest any good reading so i can understand bump steer a little better and how adjustable traction rods will affect it?

I'm not too sure the guy who does my wheel alignments will know what i'm on about... last time i got him to do a wheel alignment on my 32 he did it to the specs for a 300zx :D Not much choice of where to go where i live though :rofl:

Ok this interests me as i have aftermarket rear upper arms but no aftermarket traction rods. Can you suggest any good reading so i can understand bump steer a little better and how adjustable traction rods will affect it?

I'm not too sure the guy who does my wheel alignments will know what i'm on about... last time i got him to do a wheel alignment on my 32 he did it to the specs for a 300zx :thumbsup: Not much choice of where to go where i live though :thumbsup:

Rear bump steer is simple to measure. Take the spring and shock unit out of one side, disconnect that side swaybar link, stick the car on the wheel aligner, supporting the chassis at normal ride height of course and then measure the toe change (with the wheel aligner) as you jack that wheel up and down. Ideally there shouldn't be any change in the toe.

If you have adjustable traction rods then you simply adjust them to minimise the toe change.

I guess you already know that even by replacing the upper control arms (and traction rods) you have still left the soft, standard, old, worn out, rubber bushes in the uprights (hubs). So you are going to get some movement in toe as a result of that.

Cheers

Gary

Ahh thanks for that SK, that makes it a lot easier to understand! :thumbsup:

The bushes you mention in the hubs, is there an aftermarket option available? Also are they a diy job or something that has to be pressed in/out? Might give me something to do one weekend!

Cheers

Simon

Ahh thanks for that SK, that makes it a lot easier to understand! :D

The bushes you mention in the hubs, is there an aftermarket option available? Also are they a diy job or something that has to be pressed in/out? Might give me something to do one weekend!

Cheers

Simon

You guessed it, it's a pain in the ass job, you have to remove the uprights (hubs) and stick them in a press to remove the old bushes. I use the Whiteline rear camber kit ($125 on the Group Buy) and the 2 piece bushes just push in with your fingers, then it's just a tap with the hammer to fit the crush tubes.

Cheers

Gary

SYDNEY KID CAN YOU CONTACT ME !!! YOU`VE SENT ME THE WRONG SUSPENSION KIT. I HAVE R34 NOT R33. STOP IGONRING ME PLEASE.

Nobody is ignoring you. We get 40 to 50 PM's and emails a day, sometimes I have to actually do some work so I don't get to answer every PM and email every day. But I can assure you every single PM and every single email gets answered in the order in which we receive them. Sticking posts in innapropriate threads won't help you jump the que.

Cheers

Gary

what are the rubber bushes in the hubs

?

Rear bump steer is simple to measure. Take the spring and shock unit out of one side, disconnect that side swaybar link, stick the car on the wheel aligner, supporting the chassis at normal ride height of course and then measure the toe change (with the wheel aligner) as you jack that wheel up and down. Ideally there shouldn't be any change in the toe.

If you have adjustable traction rods then you simply adjust them to minimise the toe change.

I guess you already know that even by replacing the upper control arms (and traction rods) you have still left the soft, standard, old, worn out, rubber bushes in the uprights (hubs). So you are going to get some movement in toe as a result of that.

Cheers

Gary

what are the rubber bushes in the hubs?

Where the upper control arm and the traction rod are bolted to the upright (hub) there are rubber bushes, generally called the outer pivot point. They are pressed into the upright (hub). So you need to remove the uprights (hubs) from the car to press them out. They are the same physical size as the inner pivot points which are located in the arms.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...