Jump to content
SAU Community

Modifying factory GTR exhaust manifolds.  

95 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

So I finally decided to put my HKS 2530 turbos in last week. Or rather, start the lengthy process and steep learning curve of a budget home upgrade. Once I am done, I will do a write-up of everything as best I remember for the DIY section. The factory turbos are out, but now the project is on hold while I wait for new dump pipes to arrive. So for now, this post is about the factory GTR low mount manifolds and the potential to have them ported to match the bigger turbo inlets. Or maybe an opportunity to flame an idiot for ruining his manifolds. I did some searches on here but couldn't find any information on porting them, so I did it only with some advice from wrxhoon who said to make sure I don't leave the manifold walls too thin.

A bit more background about this project, after I had removed the turbos and manifolds etc:

I noticed that the HKS 2530 inlet flange is bigger than the factory turbo flange, and hence the factory manifold turbo flange. The previous owner had used a bigger gasket that was the same size as the 2530's (and probably most other bigger GT turbos). This resulted in a nice exhaust soot template on the factory manifold, covering the section that the 2530's inlet port should also cover and showing my how much surface area is lost in the size difference (ie, heaps).

Upon closer inspection I noticed that the manifold seems to curve out underneath to a larger space, but it has been cast to form a narrower lip to match up to the factory turbos with the smaller port. I'm not sure if this is done to help with exhaust velocity, but it seems to me that the extra volume of exhaust gas underneath is just going to create turbulence while it all tries to escape the narrower turbo flange outlet. It makes sense to me that after the collectors, the exhaust continues out as streamlined as possible and into larger spaces without bottlenecks to create turbulence and unpredictable back pressure.

The size difference between the factory turbo and the GT flange sizes is very noticable (see pic, the red line is where the dividing line is between factory turbo flange and GT larger gasket size is), so I decided to get the dremel out and spend several hours over a few days making the space bigger and giving it a straight line down to where the 3 exhaust outlets meet up. I have no idea if this will help or hurt performance but I'm hoping that it will. I slipped up and scraped along the flat flange part several times accidentally, but the damage looks a lot worse than it is, I can barely feel any of the grooves I've carved and so I will either give it a quick polish to even it up, or just fill it with putty and level with a trowel before fitting, or even just leave it that way. Photos of the damage to follow later.

I'm not game enough to touch the engine side ports. I will leave that one for the experts (ie, I'll never be able to afford it). But since I already had a template drawn onto the manifold by the gasket with exhaust soot, I figured it would be the simplest, easiest mod I could do to my car at this point, even though it took a long time with my little dremel.

Anyone got any ideas or opinions of what I've done? Have I ruined my manifolds by reaming them out like this? If so can someone sell me a cheap pair before I re-assemble everything again?

post-502-1216637957_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've finished refitting all my parts along with a pair of 2860-5's, mines dumps and stock manifolds. Did exactly what you said you did to yours, only the turbo flange as well, not the head flange as I will do that if I ever have to pull the head (match both sides).

A dremel? I went nuts with a die grinder and tungsten-carbide burrs, quicker and nastier but I suppose just like the operator :D.

Well technically all ports should match up exactly to what they're attached to and vice versa because otherwise turbulence is created in whatever space is not matched up properly. The worse the match up, the worse the turbulence.

I'm not sure how good you are with the dremel, but I think I would have taken mine to a workshop and they can match it perfectly.

I'll be upgrading my R33 GTR turbos soon too...so I'm interested with what this thread evolves to :D

I've been posting my questions on here incase anyone wants to have a look...need as much advice as I can get. Sorry, don't mean to hijack this thread lol

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...im-t228630.html

JimX...I might sound a bit cynical about taking a die grinder / dremel to the manifolds/ports....but sh[t dude if that works out for ya perfectly congrats! Am keen on seeing how you go - so far I've only done single turbo swaps on Cordias....never touched skylines before (only done intercooler install on my old 33 gtst)

Edited by tommis85

Heller44...when you have time could you have a quick squiz at my thread? I need advice exactly on your 2860's....I'm getting conflicting advice. People on here say 2860r's (both in -7 and -5) while my mechanic insists on the smaller T2560's

A dremel? I went nuts with a die grinder and tungsten-carbide burrs, quicker and nastier but I suppose just like the operator :D.

Well, the first thing I did was use what seemed to be a die grinder in this cheapass drill bit set I have because I thought it'd be way out of the dremel's league. However, I managed to blunten it in fairly short order without taking much metal out, so rather than waste time looking for a proper die grinder from a professional tool shop I thought I'd give the dremel a shot since I had a few grinding stones in the kit. I'm surprised at the tenacity of these little stones, I went through only 2 little stones and it's virtually finished. Just not sure if I want to take a bit more metal out or not yet or if I want to neaten it up any more.

I would advise anyone wanting to try this to buy a proper die grinder rather than waste so much time with a dremel, however if I had been as clumsy with the die grinder as I was with the dremel then I would have bigger missing chunks of flange to deal with. Also if nothing else, anyone that was curious to know if a dremel can do it (as I was), the answer is yes :D

port them.. or get stainless mani's

Heller44...when you have time could you have a quick squiz at my thread? I need advice exactly on your 2860's....I'm getting conflicting advice. People on here say 2860r's (both in -7 and -5) while my mechanic insists on the smaller T2560's

the -5's and -7's are sold as 2860's however they are actually GT2560R on there tags.

Well technically all ports should match up exactly to what they're attached to and vice versa because otherwise turbulence is created in whatever space is not matched up properly. The worse the match up, the worse the turbulence.

I'm not sure how good you are with the dremel, but I think I would have taken mine to a workshop and they can match it perfectly.

I'll be upgrading my R33 GTR turbos soon too...so I'm interested with what this thread evolves to :D

I've been posting my questions on here incase anyone wants to have a look...need as much advice as I can get. Sorry, don't mean to hijack this thread lol

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...im-t228630.html

JimX...I might sound a bit cynical about taking a die grinder / dremel to the manifolds/ports....but sh[t dude if that works out for ya perfectly congrats! Am keen on seeing how you go - so far I've only done single turbo swaps on Cordias....never touched skylines before (only done intercooler install on my old 33 gtst)

You have inspired me to get a closer port match with my last remaining dremel stone :( It's not that hard to match up fairly well, and it is also very easy to knock off the occasional rough spot of the factory cast as long as you're not aiming for perfectly smooth surfaces and matched ports. That's why I'm holding back on getting it perfect, because I cannot add metal back on if I take too much off. But since the consensus is that the closer the port match the better the flow, then the closer I get to matching the port should be some improvement. Even if I am 1 or 2 mm off, it's still better than the 5mm that the original size mismatch was (39mm across for factory, 44mm across for the 2530's)

Also, I think the thread will evolve into either "Installed the 2530's and the turbos aren't as laggy as I thought they'd be", or "Installed the 2530's and the turbos are hella laggy! Let me go back to stock..." as I won't be able to tell if this mod has improved or worsened lag at all, because I'm doing all this at once. I am hoping the former, of course. Oh, I just thought of a third option - "My modified manifolds exploded under boost" :D

(oh, and I don't mind the thread highjack. Everyone needs answers!)

Tom, what rb26s13 said.. mine were sold as 2860-5's came tagged as 2560, doesn't matter as long as the cartridge is labbelled 707160-5.. or if you get the 2860-7's 707160-7's..

Stock manifold mates up fairly well to the inlet flange on the stockers. There is a little bit in it, but nowhere near the extent that it needs to be hogged out to match up with aftermarket replacements. Bugger paying someone to do it though, throw it in a bench vise, use the gasket to scribe a mark and have at it, neaten up once done.

James.

Good work man! M.fold > turbo fit is shocking, makes me wonder if it was done to limit power from factory?

I was thinking the same thing! Or to make people buy an upgraded Nismo/N1 manifold, if they were ever made. Which would probably just be the same casting, but with the same bit machined out :D

Oh, and I tried to get a good photo of both flanges lined up next to each other, or even a before and after shot at the same angle/distance but it wasn't happening. So I have cropped one of my photos with the gasket lined up on top. It originally had the other manifold lined up but on a different angle which made comparing them impossible. You can see the shiny scrapes along the edge I machined. I think I can take some more off the lower left hand corner (the inner bit, not the lip/edge) to give it a bit more volume and symmetry.

Edit: The copper coloured thing is the gasket, obviously. I used it every now and then to make sure I wasn't going out of bounds.

post-502-1216643055_thumb.jpg

Haha yeh, and it's hard to get hold of other people with GTR's and who are in the same boat as you! Yes, that's quite true...you don't want to have to shave parts of the block and then off the manifold again trying to even them out lol...that would be a nightmare! I'm sure that if you left 0.5 to 1.0mm remaining you should be pretty much right (I'm guessing that stock setups are worse than 1mm out too).

Offcourse, when you're trying to jam the last couple of horses out of the turbos then well, you'd match them perfectly till you cant feel the line where manifold joins turbo / block etc. But that's risky business. You'd have to shave off a fraction and then re-fit....then shave another fraction off lol.

I'm predicting that you may have 300-500rpm more lag...maybe. Dunno. But that may all be cancelled out with good flowing exhaust to help spin those turbos up quicker. So yeh, I vote for "Installed the 2530's and the turbos aren't as laggy as I thought they'd be" ...

I shall check every day and see if you have updated the post. I'm yet to decide on twins or single...

Heller44.....I wonder why they would do this for but?? Confusing (for me, first time buying new turbos for any car)

Tom, what rb26s13 said.. mine were sold as 2860-5's came tagged as 2560, doesn't matter as long as the cartridge is labbelled 707160-5.. or if you get the 2860-7's 707160-7's..

I wonder what my mechanic will make of that this lol.

EDIT: it may explain why GT2560's and GT2860's cost the same

Edited by tommis85
sorry to ask by why re-invent the wheel? whats wrong with off the shelf hks / apexi / trust items

takes out of the guess work / fitting issues etc

What guess work? What fitting issues? Stock parts will obviously fit.. cast manifolds less likely to crack, gtr manifolds are reckoned to flow more than enough for any street oriented use, cost is free compared to megabuck jap manifolds (other than a few cutting bits).. Win / win I think. Even better the stock heat shields bolt on so it is as if it was never done. Although that is a downside, it looks as if nothing was ever done even after all the hard work fitting those buggers.

GeeTR....are they that bad are they? Personally I've never bothered to check - you think they would have done a good job with the GTR's and Skylines in general. Are stock setups like that?

Id heard over 10yrs ago how bad they are stock. 3yrs ago I saw mine and my brain exploded. "Not the Godzilla" i said. But these days i realize a restriction at that point is more of a top end restriction, then a response killer (think WRC restrictors). I still believe Nissan furiousally developed the GTR with Group A solely in mind; sketchy manifolds would limit power for the Gentleman's agreement, but allow race teams to port match IMO, any whoo...

I'd truly thought mine were a dud batch. Researching found it was v.old news to the japs. Mine looked like Jimx's. Manifolds went to Smokey; I went single.

I was thinking the same thing! Or to make people buy an upgraded Nismo/N1 manifold, if they were ever made. Which would probably just be the same casting, but with the same bit machined out :D

Hrrrm, the whole "stock vs aftermarket stainless"... Iv seen too much info from Japland, US and here that says when the stockers are abrasive ported (extrude hone, power port woteva) they ~match aftermarket ones for power & response. Being cast i would think they are more durable / retain heat. If i was doing twins, it'd be a no brainer in my head, but meh, im not getting into that one.

Edited by GeeTR
sorry to ask by why re-invent the wheel? whats wrong with off the shelf hks / apexi / trust items

takes out of the guess work / fitting issues etc

What's wrong with them is the price :D Even though the GTR is an expensive hobby I don't feel I have to spend money for the sake of getting it perfect. I have put off installing these turbos mostly for that reason and in the end I decided that I'd rather have a budget install than none at all. I'm not going to skimp on the tuning at all which will be the important place to spend the $$$. I don't think I'm going to get $1000 worth of value from a pair of HKS manifolds. I'm pretty sure I'll get the whole install and tune done for around $1000 including parts and labour, and I can't justify doubling that budget just for the sake of new aftermarket manifolds. (+$2000 for turbos, but I spent that 2 years ago so that doesn't count :D)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...