Jump to content
SAU Community

Car Friendly Turbo Leak, That's Right... Stupidest Shit Ever Come See!


Recommended Posts

Yeah, so I am wanting to actually MAKE a f**king turbo leak on my RB25DET 2nd edition. I would like to get it tuned but I am short about... IDK, 50$ or so and it is overfueling reading the air mixture, SO I need to find a good, and healthy way, if possible at all, to make a boost leak in my car.

This will likely be the ONLY topic on how to create a boost leak and not cure one, lol.

Or maybe you have another suggestion, and oh, as I mentioned, I KNOW I need it tuned, but I am short some cash, so don't go shooting that out your ass, I already know it. :devil:

Edited by AKW
Yeah, so I am wanting to actually MAKE a f**king turbo leak on my RB25DET 2nd edition. I would like to get it tuned but I am short about... IDK, 50$ or so and it is overfueling reading the air mixture, SO I need to find a good, and healthy way, if possible at all, to make a boost leak in my car.

This will likely be the ONLY topic on how to create a boost leak and not cure one, lol.

Or maybe you have another suggestion, and oh, as I mentioned, I KNOW I need it tuned, but I am short some cash, so don't go shooting that out your ass, I already know it. :devil:

Your an idiot - making a boost leak will only compound the problem. You must have been the load your mother was meant to swallow!

LOL I need something man. When I took the damn turbo gasket off the car and had it running with the turbo half off the car the car runs fine, otherwise it runs rich. And even though that's not your call, I really wish I hadn't been born. But seeing as how I have, maybe we could look into this for a temporary fix instead of calling out hasteful lines. :devil:

Besides, if I am an idiot who spelled you are as "your"?

Let's not make this a flame topic, but more along the lines of a suggestion one.

Edited by AKW

If you know people are going to shoot you down, why post that shit up?

That is the most stupid thing I have ever heard, like Rob said, it'll just make it overfuel more. It will also cause issues as you will lose boost. $50 is fuck all, save up and get it done properly. People are on here to help you out but only if you use some common sense.

stop using a narrowband 02 sensor for a reference of fuel economy indication

the sensor is slow and narrow and youll go between rich and lean non-stop ie: useless readout

learn to drive like a normal person, it only comes on boost when you load the engine up, so if you dont floor it, guess what, no boost

reasonable economy = 350kms to a tank

poor economy = 250kms to a tank

if you are getting poor then replace your 02 sensor, its a $100 part from any auto shop (EL Falcon 02 sensor is the same)

and most places can fit it for about $80 its on the dump pipe, with the right ratchet attachment (like spark plug dongle) you can do it yourself

once fitted, reset the stock ecu and youll be fine

Thanks a ton Paul, and yes, I realize this is a stupid post, but it got your attention did it not? :devil:

Also, I got the O2 sensor replacement and I replaced it about 400 kilometers ago MAX.

What is the stuff about a Narrowband though? And slow? I am somewhat confused on this statement. Yeah, I HAVE to stay out of boost, but that means not getting above 3k RPM unless I get it above 4k in 1st and 2nd gear and keep it above it, otherwise or at half throttle, it will overfuel. Does that make sense?

AND I have ran into a problem with my SAFC II. I was finally going to connect it today and got all connections made until I got to the Air Flow Meter connections. In the book the pin placement says one thing and then on the ECU pins there is no pin where it says it would be in the SAFC II manual. That's confusing......... Anyone have that problem? Or maybe have a wiring diagram for the ECU that isn't japanese?

Edited by AKW
What is the stuff about a Narrowband though? And slow? I am somewhat confused on this statement. Yeah, I HAVE to stay out of boost, but that means not getting above 3k RPM unless I get it above 4k in 1st and 2nd gear and keep it above it, otherwise or at half throttle, it will overfuel. Does that make sense?

most people buy an air/fuel gauge and plug it into their standard 02 sensor

the standard 02 sensor is only useful to the ECU as its provides some feedback for fuel economy operation, its called "closed loop"

the ECU reads the 02 sensor and trims fuel mappings in real time, in the effort to give you economy on light cruise at say 100kmh in 5th gear

its not used when your floor it or load the engine up on boost or when you vary the throttle constantly. closed loop needs a consistent light cruise for it to work and run properly.

so most poeple fit an air fuel guage and watch the lights go spastics (they do cos its a narrow/slow sensor) and believe they are wasting fuel.

the standard ecu is quiet good and giving reasonable fuel economy. you should under normal conditions be able to get 400kms to a tank with the stock ecu.

if you floor it, the car is gonna load up, its going to come on boost and its going to use more fuel than if you light cruise

when driving, just drive it like a normal car, there's no need to make it more complicated than than

a lot of people act like retards when they first get their turbo car thinking they MUST be on boost all the time

or must change before 2500rpm etc etc (similar to how you are now)....

if you take off and drive normal (not full throttle) and change around 3 grand youll will have fine fuel economy

boost or not boost, your economy will be fine - end of story. if you mash the throttle hard it will use more fuel (like any car)

AND I have ran into a problem with my SAFC II. I was finally going to connect it today and got all connections made until I got to the Air Flow Meter connections. In the book the pin placement says one thing and then on the ECU pins there is no pin where it says it would be in the SAFC II manual. That's confusing......... Anyone have that problem? Or maybe have a wiring diagram for the ECU that isn't japanese?

id say you are looking at the ECU pinout wrong or the wrong ECU pin out for your car - make sure its the right diagram and its rotated correctly

use the pin map layouts to work out which way to look at the ECU from memory its something like 10 8 8 8 (in the number of pins per block)

use that to work out which way the diagram is looking at the ECU. if you splice the wrong wire, you risk blowing stuff up

Okay, no, this isn't about fuel economy entirely although I do get poor fuel economy. When I say overfueling I mean that it is almost stopping due to it. I can drive normal, and I normally do. I only get around 250-300km to a tank. That's terrible. But it is driving like you said, around 2500 3000rpm then change a gear and coast on 80 (50 mph) most all the time if I am going "faster". 97% of the time I am doing this. But even to pass a car I have to drop the car down to second and floor it to get over the 3-4k range. Then I can go in the other gears at those RPMs. If I am in third though, for example, and I build boost at 3k RPM the car will actually bog down, shoot black smoke pretty hard core because I can see it in my mirror, and I will slow down to nothing. I had to actually take the recirc pipe off because if the turbo spools up at all the car will just smoke like hell (black smoke), bog down, and just about stop. It is like the pedal is a soft, but bumpy, break at 3k or boost. But anything that is above 4k is fine but only at 90% to full throttle. I can turbo in 1st and 2nd gear up to 3k flatspot 4k and then since it is jumping up the rev. range so fast it just carries right through it. In the other gears it has to pull through it and it just bogs down and f**king stops. It is really quite annoying and I don't know what is going on. Also, the car has mods. It has a Front Mount Intercooler, Decat, 3" Super Dragger Exaust, and HKS Super Induction Intake. I think it is just sensing a lot more air that is making it in the car but it is going into the pipes for the front mount?

EDIT:

I replaced all of the sensors with top notch and quality shit. It couldn't have been more than 500km ago. I even replaced the MAF thinking it could have been that but it did no good. It all started doing this when I put the T3 gasket on the car. The gasket when I bought it was only HALF THERE. The guy who had it before me tried to do some goup gasket bullshit as well but it obviously didn't work (duh). So when I did that it began overfueling and acting up..... and that, my friends, is why I made the topic name just this. Because I had a user friendly turbo leak.

I am looking at the Apex book for the SAFC II installation on an RB25DET 93.8-95.12. The book has been right up until I get to the air meter where I make the cut instead of the splice for this cable. The book shows the pin for the air meter 7 over from the middle to the right in the top colom. I have found that there is NO pin there. That makes no sense and yes, I am looking at the right diagram the right way, could there be a missprint? I am really confused. Maybe someone else has an SAFC II

most people buy an air/fuel gauge and plug it into their standard 02 sensor

the standard 02 sensor is only useful to the ECU as its provides some feedback for fuel economy operation, its called "closed loop"

the ECU reads the 02 sensor and trims fuel mappings in real time, in the effort to give you economy on light cruise at say 100kmh in 5th gear

its not used when your floor it or load the engine up on boost or when you vary the throttle constantly. closed loop needs a consistent light cruise for it to work and run properly.

so most poeple fit an air fuel guage and watch the lights go spastics (they do cos its a narrow/slow sensor) and believe they are wasting fuel.

the standard ecu is quiet good and giving reasonable fuel economy. you should under normal conditions be able to get 400kms to a tank with the stock ecu.

if you floor it, the car is gonna load up, its going to come on boost and its going to use more fuel than if you light cruise

when driving, just drive it like a normal car, there's no need to make it more complicated than than

a lot of people act like retards when they first get their turbo car thinking they MUST be on boost all the time

or must change before 2500rpm etc etc (similar to how you are now)....

if you take off and drive normal (not full throttle) and change around 3 grand youll will have fine fuel economy

boost or not boost, your economy will be fine - end of story. if you mash the throttle hard it will use more fuel (like any car)

id say you are looking at the ECU pinout wrong or the wrong ECU pin out for your car - make sure its the right diagram and its rotated correctly

use the pin map layouts to work out which way to look at the ECU from memory its something like 10 8 8 8 (in the number of pins per block)

use that to work out which way the diagram is looking at the ECU. if you splice the wrong wire, you risk blowing stuff up

Edited by AKW

"when I bought it was only HALF THERE" ????? not sure what this means, I don't understand how you could install half a gasket.

If the over fueling is as bad as you say, I'd be questioning other things that you might have done in the install, or an ecu fault etc, I wouldn't be sure that a 'tune' could fix it.

That's what I mean man, the gasket was only half present. The gasket was HALF there. It didn't have but half of the gasket on there. The gasket was only partially on it. It was missing half of the gasket. :worship:

My install, I assure you, has nothing to do with it. But an ECU fault my be a good guess.

XXXX

Edited by AKW

You're right, this is the stupidist shit ever.

You don't actually want a boost leak, you want an exhaust leak pre turbo to stop it spooling.

Or you want a hole between the afm and the turbo inlet so it thinks it's getting less air.

I have a trust type R bov with optional massive trumpet for sale atm too

Those are my 3 dodgy solutions in line with the thread so far.

The mods you have so far will put you well into the rich and retarded range of mapping on the stock ecu. The safc will probably fix the problem if you don't intend to modify any further.

You may also have misfiring issues associated with either old plugs, incorrectly gapped plugs or shagged coils. The sudden lack of power and clouds of black smoke out the back point towards this (that is, you're dumping a heap of unburned fuel out the exhaust because it isn't firing)

As the car drives fine on cruise and you have replaced the sensors i'd say your economy issues may be a result ot the way you drive.

Your issue is not unlike a lot of other peoples on the forum, It's just that the existing exhaust leak was effectively masking it and keeping you below the R&R threshold. You've fixed that problem and introduced the regular old problems :worship:

Edited by BHDave

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...