Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i got my brand new power fc for my car today. I hooked it up but i get a ticking from the reley near the battery. I also get a ticking from my boost solenoid. The ticking from the solenoid goes after 10 secs but the from the back its still there. i read that r33 gtst's sometimes have a voltage problem getting to the ecu so i hooked up a contant power wire to the constant power wire on the ecu to help with the voltage but that doesnt fix the reley ticking. The check engine light also flashes quickly for 10 secs but stops when the boost solenoid stops ticking. Ive disconnected the solenoid to stop the ticking but the reley at the back still ticks. On the hand cont it goes past the apexi logo to the menu. But it goes blank (backlight still on) when i get to the 'function' setting to try n disable the boost cont setting, so atleast i know the unit is suited to my car. Ive read Paulr33's FAQ's but dont get an answer for my problem. Can anyone help me please????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229981-power-fc-problem/
Share on other sites

for that level of operation something is horribly wrong

ticking relays is a sign of damaged components usualy

along with flashing engine check light something is wrong dude

i would undo main battery terminal - un-install powerfc, re-install stock ecu

confirm car runs as normal and no wierd shit (start it etc)

then if all well put the PFC back in turn car to ACC but dont start it

check normal hand controller operation etc

then if all ok start it (or better yet do DATA INIT before you start the car - its in the FAQ)

anything is possible - smell the PFC, can u smell any burnt items? open up the case and look for burnt tracks/components

put the PFC back in and turn car to ON but dont start - see if the hand controller works normal

That was the first thing i checked. There is no smell, i opened it up just to make sure - no burnt tracks. I can use the hand controller but i have only gone to try and disable the boost cont setup as advised in your FAQ, i get to 'function', go into that and thats where the screen goes blank but still with the backlight on.

on the back of the unit - seriel num ecr33 010-2486

hand cont - fcc3 020 - 26527

i rem on the screen it comes up with version 5 . xx

i have my stock ecu in now, i can hook it back up to get the version if it helps

i can get my hands on another one soon(1or2days) so ill hook that up to see if its the unit or if its the car. Ive givin up 2nite, to cold outside. Ill wait till i get the other one and see what happens with that and keep you posted. Thanx for your help

Have you tried the below section of the FAQ? I had a similar problem which was driving me nuts as everything appeared to have the correct voltages etc. When I first looked over the fuses they all seemed fine. What I didn't realise is that I was missing a fuse in the required slot. I put the correct sized fuse in a no more clicking.. I'd be double checking this as it takes little effort.

Good Luck.

My car won't start when I plug in the PowerFC, but the stock ecu works fine

First when dealing with a new PowerFC install and the car does not start there are a few basics to check;

Check the PowerFC to car loom connector

Check the warning lights on the dash, do they come up?

On the hand controller, goto ETC, SENSOR SW CHECK, are any sensors highlighted in black? (Shouldn't be)

Make sure you disable the Boost Control Kit if you aren't using it

Make sure you have the right airflow meter selected (if you have a non standard one)

Make sure you have correct injector settings (if you have non standard ones)

Check all fuses

Listen for clicking relays

Check for burning smells near the ECU and or inside the ECU

Inspect the ECU itself for physical damage or burn marks (open it up)

Finally we have seen on a few skylines that the car works fine with the stock ecu but not the with PowerFC. It has been traced back to a missing fuse. The missing fuse is on the left side in the R33 GTST and its at position #7. According to the diagram it is Engine Control. Somehow the stock ecu works if this fuse is missing but the PowerFC doesn't

See the diagram here for "Engine Control" which is a 10AMP fuse.

Edited by Fry_33

So when i first had this problem i checked for the fuse in the position stated (7), it was there, but there was a missing fuse beside that. I put a 10 amp fuse in that spot (on the fuse cover it says its for the batterty) and guess what.......the ticking stoped and now im up and running. I finally have it working :) . Thanks people for the help.

Im 1 happy chappy!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...