Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 GTST & Soarer TT


Recommended Posts

Originally posted by 2fardown

Just because you get beaten by stock standard auto magnas. :shake:

hey no fair!

you guys all drive heavily modded skylines and forget what a standard skyline is like.

if this thread refers to standard cars i rekon the soarer...

Waz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are some factory figures from a reliable internet site- if there is such a thing:

Skyline R33 GTS25T:

187kw @ 6400rpm

295nm @ 4800rpm

7000rpm redline

1390 kg

6.18 seconds 0-100

14.39 seconds 400m

2.5 GT-Turbo:

208kW @ 6200rpm

362Nm @ 4800rpm

7250rpm redline

1600 kg

7.00 seconds 0-100km/h

15.06 seconds 400m

You fellas can extrapolate what you want from those figures. Just putting everyone on the same page.

There seems to be a lot of people who judge 'near-equal' performace cars be their kerb weight. So just out of curiousity i took some figures from the Holden website about various VY Commodores, as these seem to be the baseline car when people talk about weight; they always get mentioned somewhere along the line. Anyway, here you go.

SV8 Manual: 1638 kg

SV8 Auto: 1645 kg

SS Manual: 1658 kg

SS Auto: 1664 kg

SS UTE Manual: 1618 kg

SS UTE Auto: 1624 kg

245kW @ 5200 rpm

470Nm @ 4400 rpm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee,

HPI (not sure how reliable are they) figure mentioned that a 2.5 GT-T Soarer do high 5 sec for 0-100km/h and flat 14 sec for 0-400m acceleration.

But the HPI's spec sheet for R33 is pretty accurate....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the torque figure, I wouldn't be surprised if a TT soarer can beat a GTS-t. That's an extra of almost almost 70Nm!

Driving it, the extra torque will also make the seat in the pants feels it's faster!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1jz's are factory under-rated, like 2jz's, rb26's and vg30dett's all are under the whole japanese 206kw bs. why do u think both the 1jz and 2jz are rated at like 206kw?? tell me that the 2jz aint got more power. anyways

my mate has an auto TT soarer, completly stock apart from a hks panel filter, the soarer normally wins against stockish 33's by 1-2 car length by about ~180 (so pretty close), the i found the laggy in comparison to a 33 (ive driven both, thou the 33 was pretty modded), it's lag lag lag then suddenly boost (and sideways lol)

and redline2003, trust me, they r quicker than flat 15's stock lol

with up'd boost, exhaust, intake u should beat one no prob thou, stock, ud want to get a good launch, and hope his car was running shitty lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A stock Soarer TT puts out about 149kw at the rear wheels whereas on the same dyno a Stock R33 GTS25t will do about 130kw.

With the extra weight and auto box in the Soarer it should be close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera yeah, I guessed as much, cooler temps, more boost, less knock, more timing, hello power. Unfortunately not quite within reach ATM, could upgrade my whole fuel system to support but still wouldn't have E85 to run it 😂  Anyway, I changed cams again, 260/260 poncam B and everything else the same except an EBC upgrade. Now I must say I was quite disappointed with the result as it was like running stock cams (didn't try to dial them in as they're supposed to be optimum already) but after awhile I suspected my new EBC was underperforming not to mention difficult to use. I recently swapped back my old EBC and it drives much better now, boost comes on sooner, more stable, no spikes etc, feels all quicker and faster than with stock cams. Planning to fiddle with the cam gears and see what happens but maybe skip the Dyno as I intend to revert to the HKS cams cos they really made the car come alive; low and mid end was unbelievable and it just wanted to rev to the moon, finally knew what people were raving about, RB26 really loves revs. Anyway, Dyno 03 is quite disappointing, in Dyno 02 although peak power was less and trailed off at the top, the low and mid end improvement more than made up for it.
    • @Darrel It's so tempting to say e85 is borderline magic. It cools the intake charge, so if you're flirting with the edge of the turbos compressor map it helps dramatically cool down the hot air the turbos are pumping. It is very resistant to detonation so you can crank the timing, I don't really want to say you won't be knock limited anymore.... but you probably wont be knock limited anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if you made 20% more power swapping to e85 (provided you have the fuel system to support them, bigger injectors maybe bigger pump etc). 
    • @Murray_Calavera nah, not available yet, they're gearing up for it but won't be available for a few years. So you reckon fuel is the main issue? When this bottom did over 600rwhp it was running big single, twin Z32 MAFs and believe it or not, e manage blue, an old school piggyback 😅 not really a fair comparison but I guess it shows how a big single differs to smallish twins.   
    • @Darrel Can you get pump e85 where you are? If you want to max out those turbos, e85 + bigger modern injectors will be the easiest way to get you there. 
    • Hi @Butters , thanks for your reply. Pump 97 BTW but yeah, I get that old tech is what it is and can't compare to modern stuff but I still believe 500 is achievable, even with these smallish twins. Their effective limit is around what, 24 psi? Intend to go single one day but then again, I'm not chasing big power and might not be worth the investment. Just wondering what if any factors are limiting my setup after a few changes. Let's call this Dyno 02. This is after R35 MAFs, 720cc injectors, DW300 FP, HKS step 2 264/264 cams.
×
×
  • Create New...