Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got an auto R34 with the usual mods...full 3" exhaust, fmic, hks evc, safc II & apexi itc.

It was making 200rwkw on 10-11psi. (this was with the apexi itc not installed) the tuner had advanced the timing at the CAS. It was getting a knock during gear change (when pushing it) for a split second (would show up on the safc) had a reading of 150+. Wouldn't knock at any other time.

Long story short, the itc has been installed but the tuner says that it doesn't seem to be changing the timing as much as it says (i'll check this soon) so it was still knocking when I got it back. took the car back again, took timing out from the CAS and the knock has disappeared but the power has gone down to 180rwkw.

I'd like to get it back up to a higher figure. It's just this issue of the standard ecu adding that little bit more timing at gear change on top of it already being advanced. What's my way around this?

Is the itc not the best option? would an e-mange ultimate be better...?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232897-auto-r34-pinging-on-gear-change/
Share on other sites

I've got an auto R34 with the usual mods...full 3" exhaust, fmic, hks evc, safc II & apexi itc.

It was making 200rwkw on 10-11psi. (this was with the apexi itc not installed) the tuner had advanced the timing at the CAS. It was getting a knock during gear change (when pushing it) for a split second (would show up on the safc) had a reading of 150+. Wouldn't knock at any other time.

Long story short, the itc has been installed but the tuner says that it doesn't seem to be changing the timing as much as it says (i'll check this soon) so it was still knocking when I got it back. took the car back again, took timing out from the CAS and the knock has disappeared but the power has gone down to 180rwkw.

I'd like to get it back up to a higher figure. It's just this issue of the standard ecu adding that little bit more timing at gear change on top of it already being advanced. What's my way around this?

Is the itc not the best option? would an e-mange ultimate be better...?

The auto ecu normally cuts back the timing during gear changes so it shouldn't be that causing the knock. The SITC should be fine for your purpose. Has it been wired correctly? (Full instructions here with my apologies if you already know all this http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ap...imi-t80642.html Should be easy to check at idle if you advance the Sitc 10deg that should show up with a timing light. (A bit harder under power). See if you can swap out the SITC with a known good one (seeing that I assume yours is second hand since they are no longer available new to my knowledge).

I thought it advanced the timing during gear changes? That's just what I understood from somewhere else who I've spoken to. I could very well have been mistaken but it just kind of made sense as to why it would knock only during gear change.

The SITC is wired in correctly (I presume..?) I'll definitely have a look and see if it changing the timing under idle. I guess that will answer the question about whether it's working correctly or not.

edit: it does seem like it retards instead of advances the timing during gear change so there goes all my hope :(

anyone else have any ideas why it would only be pinging on gear change..?

Edited by so_tred
I thought it advanced the timing during gear changes? That's just what I understood from somewhere else who I've spoken to. I could very well have been mistaken but it just kind of made sense as to why it would knock only during gear change.

The SITC is wired in correctly (I presume..?) I'll definitely have a look and see if it changing the timing under idle. I guess that will answer the question about whether it's working correctly or not.

edit: it does seem like it retards instead of advances the timing during gear change so there goes all my hope :D

anyone else have any ideas why it would only be pinging on gear change..?

Its probably the SAFC hearing stuff on the change, I can get relatively more noise on a WOT change...it's not knock though, the SAFC may not filter the signal from the sensor well enough and indicates it a high knock instead.

That's what I was told by the first tuning shop that took it from 180rwkw to 200rwkw.

The only thing is that it never used to get a high reading before.

Could that be explained by the jump in power therefore the transmission being a bit rougher getting into gear...?

If I check the plugs will they show signs of damage if it only happened maybe.. 20 or so times for that split second?

You need to run it side-by-side with a proper knock detector on a dyno, if they don't hear anything but the SAFC does...ignore the SAFC to the point it's indicating.

With my one '125' is where knock is being heard....I get ~70 at WOT, but on WOT gearchange 100 I'm putting it down to engine noise in general

Dan,

Do you get those readings on an SAFC or another device?

If it's an SAFC it gives me a bit more hope.

I asked the first guys who tuned it to 200rwkw how they were listening to see if it was knocking or were they just going by the SAFC. He told me that they had a guy in the engine bay with headphones listening & a guy at the back watching the exhaust to see if it blew smoke. I'm guessing they didn't hear a whole lot because he told me to disregard the SAFC's reading at that point.

I'm just afraid if they're wrong then my engine going bang.

I mean, what else is happening at the point where it's changing gears? Over fueling for a split second?..

Edited by so_tred

I'm using a tuned-frequency knock detector, not an SAFC.

Well most of my WOT gearchanges are when the rev-limit is kicking in, so a lot of popping/flaming/overfuelling and ignition cutting going on, normal gearchanges I'm not seeing much of anything

Mine would tend to get the reading when I wasn't hitting rev limiter..close to it but not quite.. always over 6,000rpm though..

But same, I don't get a reading on 'normal' gear changes. Only full boost, WOT..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...