Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone know the maths to calculate?

I took my 4dr r33 to the drags for the 1st time and these where the results. I am interested what they equate to in rwkws as I have not had the car dynoed recently

13.331 @ 114.74

13.073 @ 114.13

13.065 @ 107.32

Any help appreciated

ive had cars run 11.70 with 285rwk. i doubt 30kw=1.3sec. the mph shows about 220kw at the wheels. your mph is showing about 220ish also

i ran 13.0 @ 113mph and at the time my car had 251.7rwkw

13.331 @ 114.74

13.073 @ 114.13

13.065 @ 107.32

The power estimates mate on here have me confounded - ~220rwkw seems to be the accepted approximate power for an R33 running 114-115mph?

What is done to your car? On our dynos (well most dynos around the world) 220rwkw is achieveable at a stretch on a stock turbo but trap speeds >114mph are very much not achieveable with the stock turbo on an R33. To be running those kinds of times/speeds I'd be hoping to see you are running around 1bar of boost, maybe a fraction more otherwise I am about to get very depressed.

I ran 111mph with no more than 200kW.

I wasn't talking about the dyno power, I am thinking of almost completely disregarding Oz dyno results - they mess with my head. Now I am just talking about outright modifications, trap speed sounds like it'd be a better measure of what the engine and car is doing that trying to work out what on earth the different between your dynos and everyone elses is, I just want to know if his car is doing substantially more than what 220rwkw means to me if that makes sense?

My car has run in the same kind of territory trap speed wise, running ~14psi through a GT30R on a completely stock RB25DET on a fairly slippery strip (actually an airfield...) but makes much more than 220rwkw on the dyno I run my car on, well actually ALL of the ones I have run it on which includes a rolling road dyno it made 260rwkw on. What I am hoping to hear is that my car for the mods it has that the times/trap speeds in the conditions aren't TOO bad.

Forget dynos then. The calculations I have used above take trap speed and weight and convert it to engine horsepower. I then converted that to rwkw. It could well be the case that this car makes 240-250kW at the back wheels but for this to be the case, it would relate to one or more of the following:

a/ weigh more than the 3350lbs I've allowed for

b/ have had a non representative run on the track

c/ been racing on a ridiculously bad track

d/ have had a schmuck behind the wheel

Don't get your knickers in a knot over chassis dyno figures. The big, black dyno never lies.

One of the reason I asked in my mate just got his GTR dynoed and was 490hp at one workshop and 404hp at a different workshop which makes me wonder how accurate these figures are.

I only had my car dynoed once at the last Nissan track day at QR Raceway and it was 192kw at the rear wheels but that was with stuffed coils breaking down at higher revs, and running .09 bar. Now has Splitfires and running 1.1 bar otherwise same spec. Car is in full street trim but has some mods HKS2535, Power Fc, 550cc Inj, Z32 AFM etc.

I will put it on the dyno next week and see what the result is, but I thought trap time might give a more accurate figure

I only had my car dynoed once at the last Nissan track day at QR Raceway and it was 192kw at the rear wheels but that was with stuffed coils breaking down at higher revs, and running .09 bar. Now has Splitfires and running 1.1 bar otherwise same spec. Car is in full street trim but has some mods HKS2535, Power Fc, 550cc Inj, Z32 AFM etc.

I will put it on the dyno next week and see what the result is, but I thought trap time might give a more accurate figure

Yeah this is the short of it, dynos are all over the place in readings - in Australia they seem to be all up the crapper as once I think I am starting to work it out a new strange result comes up. Dynapack, Dynojet etc used around the rest of the world have a bit of variance but they are all close enough to each other to get a rough idea.

I am glad to hear you are running ~1.1bar, its about what I expected for the trap speeds you were running (as said in an earlier post) - so long as its on a turbo which can more or less support it thats what it should trap. On the dynos I run on for what its worth, I'd expect it to be making in the territory of 250rwkw with a crap load of torque.

Yeah this is the short of it, dynos are all over the place in readings - in Australia they seem to be all up the crapper as once I think I am starting to work it out a new strange result comes up. Dynapack, Dynojet etc used around the rest of the world have a bit of variance but they are all close enough to each other to get a rough idea.

I am glad to hear you are running ~1.1bar, its about what I expected for the trap speeds you were running (as said in an earlier post) - so long as its on a turbo which can more or less support it thats what it should trap. On the dynos I run on for what its worth, I'd expect it to be making in the territory of 250rwkw with a crap load of torque.

A correctly operated Dyno Dynamics chassis dyno in the appropriate shootout mode will register pretty well spot on regardless of weather conditions etc. Making sure it's operated correctly is another thing all together.

A correctly operated Dyno Dynamics chassis dyno in the appropriate shootout mode will register pretty well spot on regardless of weather conditions etc. Making sure it's operated correctly is another thing all together.

By spot on do you mean more or less consistant with the other dyno types, or just consistant with other Dyno Dynamics set up for shootout mode? I have noticed that there seem to be occasional readings from DD dynos which seem similar to what I'd expect from a Dynapack.

By spot on do you mean more or less consistant with the other dyno types, or just consistant with other Dyno Dynamics set up for shootout mode? I have noticed that there seem to be occasional readings from DD dynos which seem similar to what I'd expect from a Dynapack.

Spot on with other Dyno Dynamics chassis dynos run in the same fashion.

  • 1 month later...

MPH verses weight is the easiest and best way to get a pretty acurate guage the vehicles WHP.

If you can run X amount of MPH and your car weighs X amount, you must have at least a certain amount of whp to do it.

When we ran 162mph on street tyres in street trim, the power required to do so matched our dyno numbers within a few whp but in general I don't take much notice of dyno numbers as MPH doesn't lie.

Rob

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...