Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R34 GTR V-Spec = Standard GTR with firmer suspension, lower ride height, two extra readings on the Multi Function Display (MFD), which were, Intake and Exhaust Gas Temperatures, front and rear diffuser under the car.

R34 GTR V-Spec II = As of above with even more firmer suspension, larger rear brake rotors, carbon fibre bonnet with NACA Duct and clear indicator lenses.

Hi Julz,

Posts #2, #3 are spot on. Interior trim on V-Spec II is also a bit different too as Wiki says. ie. black cloth instead of grey, centre console is iridium colour, aluminium pedals.

PM me with your E-mail address if you want pics. :)

Cheers,

Tez

hay terry

thanks. i was more interested in the non v-spec and v-spec rather than v-specII (i cant really afford a II at this stage of the game have to buy my first property next feb-march so trying to keep the budget to 50k including on roads and insurance at this stage)

but i have found a few pics here and there and also browsed carsales a bit

cheers

Search is your friend, lots of vspec/vspec 2 and so on, comparisons, there was one really good thread that covered all of the 34 models, cant be bothered looking for it, but it is about, maybe its one of these

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sp...e+between+vspec

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...e+between+vspec

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Sp...e+between+vspec

To be honest there is not all that much more to a V-Spec to a Standard R34 GTR.

Im sure if you just bought a Standard GTR you could add the accessories on yourself, it might end up cheaper that way... But depends on how much a Standard one goes for VS a V-Spec.

When I was searching for a non V Spec, I found other factors contributed to the final price more than the model itself. Such attributes like mileage, auction grade, and colour of the car had more to do with the selling price than the car being a V Spec or not.

yeah i know what u mean fellas. i just think that if i can get a v-spec for the same price as a non v-spec i reckon y wouldnt i. i cant buy for another 60 days anyway coz my cash is in a term deposit at the bank and doesnt open/unlock till 30th october. (i could open it now but ill lose 12% interest on 50,000 so im not really willing to lose a free 6 grand u know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...