Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

mucking around with more long exp in the car. Dw sidd, i was passenger this time :P. these are the cheltenham rd eastlink for those in melb. nothing spesh

39.

gallery_30915_2820_118476.jpg

40.

gallery_30915_2820_159340.jpg

41.

gallery_30915_2820_197787.jpg

42. a foosball table my mate is reconstructing in his spare time

gallery_30915_2820_164633.jpg

43.

gallery_30915_2820_97922.jpg

mum brought me some juice and the camera was next to me and one thing led to another.

man that sounds so disturbing :cool:

on a serious note nice pics.. if you need a nice r33 for a model to shoot let me know i would love some nice pics (poster size) of my car and of course dollars or slabs or any other alcoholic beverages your way for my gratitude.

lol when you put it like that, it does sound odd. regarding the photo shoot, i'd love to shoot your car man. only thing is i think im gonna practice on mine first. i should organise a photoshoot/meet or something in the near future.

lol when you put it like that, it does sound odd. regarding the photo shoot, i'd love to shoot your car man. only thing is i think im gonna practice on mine first. i should organise a photoshoot/meet or something in the near future.

awesome, let me know when you are ready :)

here are some pics from the weekend. all the cruise shots and the filter are taken with the 50mm. i dunno bout the other because i was changing between the kit lens and the 50mm through the night. the 21st went well. realise i need a good flash.

44.

gallery_30915_2820_74592.jpg

45.

gallery_30915_2820_63155.jpg

46.

gallery_30915_2820_130471.jpg

47.

gallery_30915_2820_96127.jpg

48.

gallery_30915_2820_60723.jpg

49.

gallery_30915_2820_68966.jpg

50.

gallery_30915_2820_163986.jpg

51.

gallery_30915_2820_116586.jpg

52.

gallery_30915_2820_132843.jpg

an impromptu shoot while i was at uni. didnt even wash the car. excuse the crappy quality. lost something in the uploading. however when i was reviewing the pics on the comp i noticed a bit of lens flare and a lot of softness. i dunno bout the flare but am i right in thinking that shooting with a smaller aperture (bigger number) will result in a sharper pic?

53.

gallery_30915_2820_10916.jpg

54.

gallery_30915_2820_159491.jpg

55.

gallery_30915_2820_60396.jpg

You can see the flare coz you are pointing the camera straight at that light bulb.

Also f8 is about right for those night type shots on your stock kit lens. Im assuming you are using stock lens for these shots?

Also perhaps try and get the whole car under the light. So there will be no dark spots on the car. Your car is already a dark color.

I like shot two the most :( keep it up!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...