Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i cant say i liked any of the nfs games too much. i have pro street, was ok, but didnt really juice my lemon. Same as all the previous NFS games.

i would like the new one if:

it had the realism of gt5

had an unbelievable amount of mods both mechanically and aesthetically

courses included the wangan, mt fuji mountain roads, mt akina from initial D, tsukuba circuit, bathurst and the piece de resistance - winton motor raceway

Removed ALL american influence and replace design team with the guys from tokyo xtreme racer or wangan midnight

and youve got yourself the best game in the world

all the nerds on nfs forums are calling it an epic fail.

but from what ive seen them ask for. their asking for the impossible!

What are they asking for? Realistic physics? :P

Might check it out on a later date...

  • 3 weeks later...

Just realised this thread.

Here is what I said in the "Currently Playing" Thread.

Finished it on PS2 in about a week, but could have finished it quicker.

Graphics a terrible, the default controller layout is annoying cuz Im use to Carbons settings.

Tuning wise its is a lot better than Pro Street as you do not have to spend as much time mucking around with settings.

Had about the same amount of cars than Carbon but still Pro Street had the most.

The game was quite easy to win.

What I hate about Pro Street and Undercover is that, there is no FREE CUSTOMISE like in the previous NFS. No Highway Battles in Quick Race which is sucks.

The cut scenes are OK and Maggie Q was the only thing worth watching.

So far I have completed Career Mode of 87% (just a few lose end to tie up) with a Nissan Skyline R34 GTR V-Spec, Nissan 180SX, 911 Turbo GT2, Lamborghini Galardo and Ford Mustang cop cars in my garage.

They pretty much took parts from Carbon and Pro Street put it together and changed a few race events around.

Overall its a Good game.

BTW Is the R35 GTR avaliable to unlock in the PS2 version? Maybe I gota race the Challenge Series...

ive got the R34 in millenium jade, on bronze TE37's.. the rest is stock. sooo sexy

R35 in gunmetal grey, stock rims. sexy. does 390km/h

the theres the GT2

and some other cars i dont remember

Played it the other day, wasn' that impressed. Exactly the same as NFS Most Wanted with a bit of an upgrade on little things here and there. I think they should just stop making them for a while until they make a decent "new" game that is miles ahead of the old ones. Kind of like GT5 is to GT4, huge difference.

However the Veyron is cool :down:

what cars you got bakes?

all my cars dont have any nitrous

i flew through the game.

my R35 maxs out at 389 km/h :banana:

i dont like how every corner theres a fkn cop

i cant even do a top speed run on my R34

Need for speed underground = realistic driving engine imo, when you accelerate, u accelerate, when u brake u brake, when you take your foot off the gas you here compressor surge ( in some cars), only faults in that game was when you fully mod sumthin like a Supra or a Skyline the growl of the 2jz/ rb26 instantly turns into that annoying 4cylinder sound. So I just never do up the engine part to get around this.

Need for speed most wanted = alright game but the modifications were limited compared to NFSU2 , when u accelearte u dont accelerate, u do a pycho ass burnout thus forcing u to go stop to go in 2nd ( my own experience)

Need for speed carbon = even less modification potential due to teh fact if u done have an aftermarket rear bumper u cant have an aftermarked exhaust WTF? , and I absoloutely hate Autoscult, every kit looks the same, drivign engine is the same as in Most wanted im pretty sure same retarded acceleration

Need for speed pro street= I played for 1 day and epic quit, I HATED IT!

Need for speed undercover = driving engine seems to be better then the normal most wanted onwards style, but the game is still hindered by the modification restrictions. most performance mods and visual mods are restrictive and not in depth however cruising around the highway system I must say is pretty fun and the fact cops never seem to go a shit about me speeding past is good. I did find 1 retard thing tho, when I 1st got the game I did a bit of career and bought the G35 skyline which im pretty sure (99.9999%) is a Non turbo 3.5l VQ35DE V6, however for sum reason it is turbocharged and has a BoV lol.

To make the ultimate driving game i reckon it should have a map the size of GTA San andreas to drive around, the driving engine of Underground 2 and extremely indepth performance modification such as boost pressure, turbo sizing, specific internals specs, gearboxes, exhaust composition, wastegate options (screamer pips in a game would rule), BoV options (im sick of HKS lol) , etc etc

thats my rant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...