Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You guys with aftermarket fuel pumps,ECU and injectors running over 200rwkw whats your fuel economy like ?

Does it suck it down, because my R33 is guzzling...

Only 200kms or so for $40.00

Ive been told its to do with the tuning of the car...

Also what ECU's are you using?

Lepperfish... :burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/
Share on other sites

I recently got 12.6L/100km, which was 70km of freeway driving and about 380 of normal city driving. Usually I get low to mid 13's (L/100km) with no freeway driving. Sometimes just over 14 if I have the hammer down a lot or get stuck in a lot of traffic.

If you're getting only 200km out of $40 (which I assume is around 40 litres) then something's very wrong. That is 20L/100km and a lot more than any 200kw Skyline should be getting. I don't think that's a matter of tune but rather a matter of something being wrong, such as the AFM. Get it checked out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-502765
Share on other sites

My Economy sucks as well. Normal city driving no long distance trips about 250k a tank then I did an two hours at 100km on the highway with city driving and I got 390km.

Although it seems when I go hard I get better economy? Like if I take it to the strip and do a few runs I get close to 300km a tank. Strange :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-502923
Share on other sites

The key to good fuel economy is no sudden accelleration.

You can sit on 110km/h on a freeway all day and do the same fuel mileage as you would doing 60km/h up a busy road with heaps of lights.

Im consistantly up around 420-450km from a full 60L's which isn't -too- bad I guess.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-502967
Share on other sites

Performance car + lead foot +skyine = Poor fuel ecconomy :( but lots of fun. :)

If you want ecconomy why not get a push bike?

Compared to the cost of tyres, front mounts, larger turbos, more tyres, the "was that a skyline?" factor, another set of tyres, why worry about the cost of petrol? Its a bit like complaining about the cost of car pollish, -you just GOT TO use it :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503153
Share on other sites

550cc injectors, bosch 044, power fc, HKS3037 and I got 360km from 50L, but that inlcuded a fair bit of playing and one hour on the dyno. I have never had that bad, ie 200km from 40L, even with a 4 hour dyno tune (same setup), it wasnt that bad, the tune only used 1/2 tank, or a tad under.

So yeah, I reckon you got probs:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503177
Share on other sites

I spoke with Lepperfish in pm about this after having another think, but I'll put up the info here anyway for anyone else with a similar problem.

I had another thought that it might be related to a lack of closed loop mode on his ECU. We're not sure if his aftermarket ECU supports closed loop mode or not, but if not it would explain why he's getting good power but shitty economy when cruising.

Btw, I don't subscribe to the theory that just because it's a performance car it means you have to get bad economy, if I was of that opinion I would have bought a supercharged V8 :cool: The whole point of a turbo is you don't have to waste fuel if you don't need to.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503178
Share on other sites

Failing AFMs will usually produce bad flat spots as well as bad economy and less than optimal power. Try cleaning it first if you haven't done so. Get some electrical contact cleaner from Jaycar to do this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503284
Share on other sites

rb25...

walbro pump...

t04e turbo...

chipped ecu

13 psi... mmm... over 200rwkw easily, and i get about 350 to a tank.

Thats with a bit of stick here and there. And crusing mixed into that too.

I'd say if i went easy for a whole tank i could get close to 400km.

If i drive it crazily it's not unbeknown for me to see the underside of 250km's to a tank... that hurts

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503311
Share on other sites

Those figures I posted above were not running closed loop, ie O2 sensor disabled. I am thinking that perhaps your tune is a bit rich. Wherever you had it tuned, it would be worth taking it somewhere else and just getting them to check AF ratios - at least it would eliminate, or find, one possible cause.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503373
Share on other sites

Originally posted by WLD747

i fill $35 / 40L of petrol and get 200kms as well i reckon could be afm.

Do you think if i put a z32 afm would be better for economy and responsiveness.

you cant just 'change' AFM's

you need an a/m ECU or chip to do that dont ya ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23471-fuel-enconomy/#findComment-503497
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...