Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some slimy little shit stole my boot badge last night!!!

It's gotta be a local kid, no one else walks down my street at night. If I ever find out who it was I will give up my law degree just for the satisfaction of beating the crap out of them.

Lucky I have a spare one, now I just gotta figure out how to put it on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23501-fcking-hell/
Share on other sites

yeah i ****ing well wanna get this little cuint

luckily, as i said, i have a spare one from when i bought my wing (came with the whole bootlid)

i just have to find it and attach it. Its even the nicer silver one (had the older black one)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23501-fcking-hell/#findComment-503312
Share on other sites

Very crap Max. When someone stole the ash-tray from the Lada - I wanted to go thermonuclear on them...

I was substatially more upset when Golgo got raped - but having a badge pinched is just crap. Stupid kids - ought to be a law...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23501-fcking-hell/#findComment-503557
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Jamezilla

Stupid kids - ought to be a law...

James, do you mean a law preventing them from ganking our badges or a law allowing us to pound them when we catch them?

In fact I think a law allowing grevious bodily harm on anyone under 16 is a good idea. It'd save me from having to go to prison when all these court case I've been summond to are over. I hate kids.

:hellpisd: :hellpisd: :hellpisd:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23501-fcking-hell/#findComment-503645
Share on other sites

Both :)

Nothing will learn a cheeky 14yo faster than a good beating.

Matter of fact - I'm thinking of leaving this little sucker lying around as bait :D

Seriously though - I really liked the store owner who busted some chump shoplifting, he then made said kiddy walk around the shopping centre with a shirt branded 'I am a thief'. The civil liberties tools took offence and tried to punish the store owner or something - it was on Ray Martin. My attention span is pretty short on that show.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23501-fcking-hell/#findComment-503657
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...