Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i got a c210 gt 200 l20et 5spd manual 4 door :P bought it outta the quokka for about $1200 2 yrs ago!!! not the best condition but yea it was drivable n running quite nice. tried selling it a few months ago i would have taken anything to get it outta my back yard but now have fallen back in love with it and am planning on restoring the old girl. anyone know any contacts for parts etc???

what is quokka? an n.z thing?

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i got a c210 gt 200 l20et 5spd manual 4 door :cool: bought it outta the quokka for about $1200 2 yrs ago!!! not the best condition but yea it was drivable n running quite nice. tried selling it a few months ago i would have taken anything to get it outta my back yard but now have fallen back in love with it and am planning on restoring the old girl. anyone know any contacts for parts etc???

A 2L GT, a turbo? My friend has a 210 2L turbo coupe and it goes like the clappers! Im in Vic and have some parts in the shed. What are you after?

N1GTR and Das Kamu, just to clarify, what exactly are you looking for - C210, C211, 240K, coupe or sedan, and what kind of condition, grandpa-spec original, rusty project etc? If I am right N1GTR is hoping for a 240k coupe, and Jason would prefer a c210 or c211 of some sort. There are still cars around in Victoria, but it's bordering on pot luck as to what kind of shape its in. I'm happy to keep a look out and ask around if I know what you want.

N1GTR and Das Kamu, just to clarify, what exactly are you looking for - C210, C211, 240K, coupe or sedan, and what kind of condition, grandpa-spec original, rusty project etc? If I am right N1GTR is hoping for a 240k coupe, and Jason would prefer a c210 or c211 of some sort. There are still cars around in Victoria, but it's bordering on pot luck as to what kind of shape its in. I'm happy to keep a look out and ask around if I know what you want.

hey im on the look out for -

c110's sedan and coupe (preferably coupe)

C210's sedan and coupe - c210 take precedent over 110

body condition has to be at least semi together ill consider most things

would prefer a grandpa spec c210 coupe or sedan over all though ........

would be awesome if you could keep the eyes peeled mate

im yet to go to a wreckers past ipswich (QLD) seems there may be a datsun selection there?

ill take pics whilst there

Hey Drew that would be awesome :cool:

You're right, im after a 2door, i want to end up with a replica (albeit rb26 with big single turbo powered) one of these;

(this is the same series of pics i have on the walls at the office :yes: )

0528f.jpg

1455726646_1122bdbcdb.jpg

1454855587_00d87ff4fc.jpg

1455722752_d75e1c4cf4.jpg

cg110.jpg

Got the motor, turbo and random other parts waiting like brakes etc. Not looking for as much power as my r32, just 300rwkw will do this project - the power to weight will be entertaining :rofl:

Drew i dont mind if its "seen better days", id actually prefer that as the price should be lower and im not paying for something i dont need (although beggars cant be choosers). The whole body will be stripped and built from the ground up, half cage to stiffen it up and have a bit of "not just another nice looking classic", newer style seats, no rear seats (new moulded carpet instead), all new dials etc. Really the parts that matter for the interior are; dash, door trims, sun visors, gearshift surround (hopefully the gearbox will line up with that, if not ill cross that bridge later), pillar garnishs. If the motor is on its lasts legs thats cool too, im not fussed either way

Thanks :)

ugh... you do realise it'll still sport a solid rear axle right? and it handles like... well... a 1970's car.

Drew, Steve (N1GTR) is after a C110 coupe so he can build a Ken Mary GTR replica.

Yeah i know it will have some old school technology :D Its not the path anyone would go down for a car that handled well - you'd go and spend the money on something much newer starting at S13 :(

haha i thought it was possible once too... then i went and bought an AE86. engine swap and lots of power later, it still felt like a car out of the 80's. I can only imagine what something from the 70's would be like as a performance car. I'd still own a C10 or C110, but it'd have to be as close to original as possible, or the mods have to be from the same period.... so I'm talking Kakimoto 3.1L L series engine with sweet raspy trumpets on the carbs or something.

Also keep in mind as soon as you drop a newer engine into the car you'll have to adhere to newer EPA regulations. If you have an older engine you could pretty much run a straight pipe all day long and no one can do anything about it.

In any case... if you want something from that era and cheap why not go for a 260Z or a 240Z if you can find one cheap?

lol a straight pipe isnt going to happen. But i know what you mean, it wont be easy to keep it legal (need to do brakes and whatever else cause of power to weight to give it a chance of being engineered), thats actually something ill be looking further into over the next few weeks - if you put an rb26 into a 1970's car i would assume you have to abide by the regs of, mmm, lets say its a 1989 motor :D

But then the rta being rta i wouldnt be suprised if there's a law in there that says it has to abide by emissions later than 1989

Dont forget the gtr and supra are still here, so they can do all the "cornering" duties :(

Hey Drew that would be awesome :(

You're right, im after a 2door, i want to end up with a replica (albeit rb26 with big single turbo powered) one of these;

I'm also looking for a 2 door ( I have a 4 door ), but been in Tassie, it makes it a lot harder to find one here

ugh... you do realise it'll still sport a solid rear axle right? and it handles like... well... a 1970's car.

Drew, Steve (N1GTR) is after a C110 coupe so he can build a Ken Mary GTR replica.

If you are talking about the "C110 coupe" as having a "solid rear axle", then you don't know much about them, mine and all the rest have independent rear end.

Nigel

they dont have a solid axle........

Nope fully Independent rear end, I know of one guy in i think qld who put a z31 or z32 rear end in, but he's spent heaps on his car, and it will be grouse,

Right. Im on the lookout for grandpa's C210 and a couple of project 240K coupes. I have a couple of leads.

On the topic, I am happy with the way my white C210 handles, and I'm not afraid to throw it around some. Fingers crossed Ill finally get to do some entry level motorsport with the NSDOC this year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...