Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nengun has them for the HKS GTRS for:11004-AN008To Suit ECR33 RB25DET S1 & S2 93/9-98/5AU $ 2,467.65

Anyone know of anyone who could beat that price?

Thats the price excluding delivery. Because of the bad exchange rate its going to be 2760 delivered. When last month it was 2400 delivered. You have to sign up to nengun to get postage costs.

PM Slide, i think he can do the HKS GTRS kit a bit cheaper.

Honestly don't worry about "if the turbo fails its going to blow the engine" because it isn't!

It is very, very rare for parts of the exhaust wheel to go upwards into the exhaust manifold and into a valve. Most of the time the exhaust wheel and shaft end up in your cat. If your unlucky enough the compressor wheel will let go and end up in an intercooler. For some of those parts to get through into your engine is rare so honestly if you don't actually want an upgrade because you want more power, only due to you being worried, then just leave the turbo as it is.

Turbo upgrades blow $5000+ easily out of your wallet when you include:

turbo $1000-$2500

ecu $1000-$1500

Z32 AFM $200 (if not MAP sensored)

fuel pump $200-$300

injectors $600

clutch $500-$1000

splitfire coilpacks $450

tune $400-$600

intercooler/exhaust/silcone/etc etc

Labour if you aren't doing anything yourself... $1000-$1500

It all adds up man. Now whats better, leaving the car as it is, or spending that much money just to make sure the turbo doesn't let go.... Your call.

Edited by PM-R33

Very true indeed... Only upgrade it if you really need or want the extra power. If its just an excuse for your mrs then just keep her away from this thread :ninja:

for a cheaper option go a gcg highflow and keep total output to 230rwkw and you should get away with stock injectors, afm and fuel pump

Very true indeed... Only upgrade it if you really need or want the extra power. If its just an excuse for your mrs then just keep her away from this thread :blink:

for a cheaper option go a gcg highflow and keep total output to 230rwkw and you should get away with stock injectors, afm and fuel pump

Thanks for all the replys, very much appreicated!

I always had the intention of doing injectors, fuel pump and airflow meter anyway.

Im really interested in the HKS GT-RS bolt on kit, initially was turned off by the Just Jap Price of $3800, but when i realised nungun and slide where doing them for a grand cheaper, it has sparked my interest!

New Question for the day. Do the 300zx T/T stock injectors (430cc/min) fit the rb25det?

or is it the same story as the gtr injectors top v's side feed?

2nd Question for the day. Would the Greddy Emanage Blue be a satisfactory piggyback ECU to run my desired tune/setup outline in first post?

Cheers.

Jason

Edited by Housie

The e manage can handle those power levels quite well afaik...

Greddy run them on plenty of their highly modifyed demo cars

also make sure you look at the hks 2835 pro s kit. Its a thousand schmux more but it makes an easy 260 to 280rwkw depending on supporting mods and tune.

I'm running mine in conjunction with an ex cam gear and have 265rwkw but spooling up as early as the gtrs. It also makes 245 on a lazy 1 bar with full boost by around 3500 and without having to run at its limits

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...