Jump to content
SAU Community

Willall Racing Buys Australia's First Official Complied/street Registered R35gtr


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Matt, not sure how well a high alcohol fuel would go in a car that is driven as often as yours isn't.

Alky loves the moisture.

Will, that's exactly what Shaun & I were talking about yesterday.

I've only just learnt that E85 exists - been hiding under a rock. It might be a case of switching between E85 and pump 98 tunes, I'm not sure. Example: in goes a tank of E85 for some fun, run it low, in goes a full tank of pump 98, switch tune over to 98, fuel system has mostly 98 in it and can sit in the shed till next time. It seems good in theory. Then again I could be way off - Martin would be the man to confirm that one.

Obviously the injectors need to have enough capacity to support the E85 and fuel pressure will need to be spot on etc.

One thing is sure, we'll certainly do a Martini 110 tune.

Drove the car yesterday and was able to use full throttle for the first time in about 2 years! It does in 3rd what it use to in 2nd. I like it.

I notice someone mentioned Skylines Downunder in this thread. Good old SDU. I can still recall registering on SDU when it had about 100 or so members - in about 1997 or thereabouts. Times have certainly changed!

Anyway back on topic; Can't wait to see what a tuned, exhaust upgrade, boost increase R35 GT-R can achieve on the drag strip. It's only a matter of time till people start run high 10's with a mild R35. Events like Targa West and Targa Tas are also going to be interesting as more R35's start popping up.

Ohh, didn't even know that! God, Nissan know what they're doing then hey. Way to destroy the hopes and dreams of others. No big single turbos for the new GTR's for a while then. :)

Was looking for that pic too Adam, yeah as you can see, one whole unit :(

to quote a certain new zealander seagull.... 'thts sht...'

-D

Nah won't take long at all for the tuning companies to make some T3 outlet style exhaust manifolds to bolt all the normal turbochargers to - I would be very surprised if someone hadn't made one already and has it in testing pending release for sale to the general public. Remember that the Yanks have grabbed onto marketing of the GTR and have already started throwing money at development - not to mention all of the decent Jap tuning houses have had one for 9+ months now.

the turbine clearly looks integrated but nothing stopping the compressor housing from being detached by the looks of things......don't know where your going to find a suitable replacement though. Like Andrew said, pretty soon you'll be able to replace that whole setup anyway.

Ohh, didn't even know that! God, Nissan know what they're doing then hey. Way to destroy the hopes and dreams of others. No big single turbos for the new GTR's for a while then. :closedeyes:

And you can only thank the good son of rajab above for that.

Hopefully this integrated approach will stop some of the general public turning these engines into laggy slovenly performers through the midrange with badly thought out turbo upgrades, which has been happening in the RB world for years. Amen :)

Ohh, didn't even know that! God, Nissan know what they're doing then hey. Way to destroy the hopes and dreams of others. No big single turbos for the new GTR's for a while then. :closedeyes:

Jarrad when they finally do come up with an aftermarket replacement for the 'V' engine (which they will), it will still be a dual setup, unlike the inline RB's

Jarrad when they finally do come up with an aftermarket replacement for the 'V' engine (which they will), it will still be a dual setup, unlike the inline RB's

Another way of looking at it.....

With the stock GTR IHI RHF55 turbochargers each good for around 35lb/min airflow with reasonable efficiency and using boost of around 1.4 bar,

The answer to a properly tuned stock power output would be close to 370 - 390kw at all four wheels without changing the turbines.

Now, correct me if I am wrong here, but that would be more power than 99.9% of most Skyline owners would ever get close to having, or even possibly dreaming about. Nissan should be thanked for using such capable turbochargers on these engines in the first place. They make even the 34N1 turbochargers look like jelly wristed pea shooters in comparison :closedeyes:

Edited by Martin Donnon
Another way of looking at it.....

With the stock GTR IHI RHF55 turbochargers each good for around 35lb/min airflow with reasonable efficiency and using boost of around 1.4 bar,

The answer to a properly tuned stock power output would be close to 370 - 390kw at all four wheels without changing the turbines.

Now, correct me if I am wrong here, but that would be more power than 99.9% of most Skyline owners would ever get close to having, or even possibly dreaming about. Nissan should be thanked for using such capable turbochargers on these engines in the first place. They make even the 34N1 turbochargers look like jelly wristed pea shooters in comparison :closedeyes:

thats a good way of looking at it.... and a good analysis of the 34n1 turbos lol...thats decent power for sure.

Edited by Ryanrb25
thats a good way of looking at it.... and a good analysis of the 34n1 turbos lol...thats decent power for sure.

Look its a forum, anyone can have an opinion - but heres the facts....

R35 GTR Stock

0-100km/h - 3.5 sec

0-400M - 11.5/11.6sec @ 120-122mph

Now to get this pace from an R32/33/34 GTR you will need -

TD05 kit/GT2540 turbochargers or similar running 1.5 bar boost

700cc+ fuel injectors

Upgraded fuel pump

Programmable management FC or similar with a correctly carried out tune

Front pipes

Full exhaust system with cat removal

Upgraded twin/triple clutch

Possible intercooler upgrade

and be prepared to build an engine for it in the very near future...

as well as being in a constantly harrassed and defectable car :closedeyes:

This isnt a guess. We have done our fair share of GTR modification over the years.

Nissan have done a very good job of building a genuine supercar that thankfully DOESNT need a bucket of cash thrown at it to make it go like it should.

That is the true value of R35 :)

Edited by Martin Donnon

Having said that the rb is late 80's technology and i believe it did very well to last this long....time to step aside i think, although the R35 is yet to be proven 100%. Time will tell...i have complete faith.

Edited by Ryanrb25

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...