Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i dont know if this is the correct section, but im building up a track gtr and planning on circuit work on semi slicks and drifting as well with another engine setup and rwd, the motor is pretty serious (over 550rwhp) so i need a fair bit of fuel. I am gonna go straight for a fuel cell instead of using the original tank setup. I doubt ill be competing in door to door action in the near future, its more a time attack setup so not going to be on track for extended periods of time. I might do dutton rally etc in the future though.

Now the question is what size to go for, i want a smaller one if possible but dont want to be refueling every 5 min because its too small?

Im thinking if i go small enough i dont need a surge tank as well or should u always run a surge tank setup?

is it best to get one with a sender setup in it as well?

at the moment im leaning towards a 30L one, so i assume a surge tank is a definate yes for this size?

If running a surge tank do u just run an external lift pump (bosch 040?) and then that feeds the surge tank (couple of litres in size?) then to my 2 bosch 044 pumps then to the motor?

any info on peoples setups in race cars appreciated

Edited by unique1

Surge tank may be the better option i had fuel surge with a 35 litre tank.

Also maybe the only way you will connect 2 044 pumps into the system as each should have its own - 6an supply, would be quite difficult to run them with only one low pressure outlet between them

if you have a read through Duncans R32 build thread you will see some fuel tank/surge tank discussion that youl find helpfull. but in short if you are running a cell with no internall pumps, you will need a surge tank/lift pump setup. . unless you modify tank to run internall pumps with a sump or baffles.

i am trying this in my car. have modified fuel cell to house 2 040 bosch pumps to eliminate the need of a surge tank, but it is untested a this stage.

Hey guys i dont know if this is the correct section, but im building up a track gtr and planning on circuit work on semi slicks and drifting as well with another engine setup and rwd, the motor is pretty serious (over 550rwhp) so i need a fair bit of fuel. I am gonna go straight for a fuel cell instead of using the original tank setup. I doubt ill be competing in door to door action in the near future, its more a time attack setup so not going to be on track for extended periods of time. I might do dutton rally etc in the future though.

Now the question is what size to go for, i want a smaller one if possible but dont want to be refueling every 5 min because its too small?

Im thinking if i go small enough i dont need a surge tank as well or should u always run a surge tank setup?

is it best to get one with a sender setup in it as well?

at the moment im leaning towards a 30L one, so i assume a surge tank is a definate yes for this size?

If running a surge tank do u just run an external lift pump (bosch 040?) and then that feeds the surge tank (couple of litres in size?) then to my 2 bosch 044 pumps then to the motor?

any info on peoples setups in race cars appreciated

post-20078-1222003049_thumb.jpg

post-20078-1222003163_thumb.jpg

Edited by BezerkR32

the tank is off the shelf but the sump with the 2 intank pumps is custom, as well as the feed lines being plumbed through the side of the tank into the inline filter.

LOL same tank i had!

thanks for the info, i went to the local track yesterday and had a look at some other cars racing and talking to the drivers and they reckon they are using around 17L in the 8 lap races so a 30L tank is probably the best size for me, i dont want too big or i might as well leave the stock tank arangement in. My other car with the engine im gonna use is running twin Goss intank pumps feeding to a 3L surge tank and then 2 x 044's into a single 1/2' fuel line to the motor.

The 2 goss pumps would still be ok on the low pressure side of the surge tank even if not submersed (sp?) in fuel? I might use them instead of the single 040 as mentioned.

Running the lift pump is the same as running intank pumps setup wise isnt it? just need small low pressure pumps to feed surge tank and then the 044s for the engine supply is ok? it wont suck the surge tank dry will it if its been ok in the current car and running same power?

cheers

yeh, this is of upmost importance. ive run carter 14psi lift pumps for surge fill with Bosch 984 pressure pump and never emptyed the surge, but fuel return was always plumbed back to surge tank, then overflow back to main tank.

as long as your fuel return is plumbing into the surge tank should be ok
  • 1 year later...

sorry to dig this up.

in regards to the overflow line, does it matter if it goes from the top of the surge to the bottom of the fuel cell?

im not sure if it will be able to drain this way or doesn't it matter due to the system being pressurized.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...