Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

Im sure this may have been asked before.. but here goes...

I am sick and tired of my standard computer. The biggest let down of my R33 skyline has been the standard computer and the fuel cut problem. Air flow meters drive me crazy and I want to get rid of it once and for all. Fuel cut defenders drive me crazy.. Sick of getting dyno read outs at 95ks an hour because it hits fuel cut rah hah rah

I can get a Microtech LT12 for my R33 for $1550.00 (No hand controller)

OR

I can get a APEXi D Jetro PFC for $1,103.00 and $1,462.00 with HC (this version gets rid of the air flow meter so I wont have to worry about that)

OR

APEXi SAFC2 or similar.

My mods are

T3/T4 hybrid turbo (no ceramic rear wheel)

Supra Front mount

cold air injduction & K&N

3" HKS exaust

Would a SAFC2 do the job? or should i get a APEXi D Jetro PFC and just be done with it ?

I am after 225rwkw and plan on doing the RB30 upgrade within the next three months too.

I think the S-AFC will give you problems with the bigger turbo as its only controlling fuel and the ECU will need more than just fuel map adjustments to suit the larger turbo properly.. but it will fix the fuel cut problem.

I think you're best with the PFC unless you are going to have troubles finding somebody who can tune it properly. Otherwise the microtech in capable hands should do a similar job. Either will probably be a better choice than the S-AFC

I'd go the Power FC if you have someone to tune it up properly....I wouldn;t be in too much of a hurry to get rid of the AFM either.

I currently have the EMS Dual Sport and will probably change to a PFC when I can afford it

If you say that i should keep the Air flow meter.. but doesnt the air flow meter have a limit to how much power it can make? Wouldnt I have to upgrade to a Z32 AFM ?

If so.. whats the point? stuff the AFM off and go map sensor I say..

So why keep the AFM?

the afm is supposed to be more accurate than a map sensor. so if your going for the extra tunability of the power fc then youd be better off with more accurate readings.

i read somewhere on here that the rb25 afm is good up to 250 rwkw, but dont quote me.

Engines with an AFM will usually be more driveable and have better fuel economy.

Depends how far you want to go... If your not going to change the turbo and what to keep it fairly driveable, go the PowerFC.

The older Microtechs give poor fuel economy but make good power. I don't know if the newer models are any better.

Here's the same advice I give anyone. If you have the bucks, get the PowerFC. If you don't, rather than waiting and saving up until you can afford one, get a S-AFC (or S-AFC2) new or second hand (preferably second hand). Then tune that and start saving for your PowerFC. When you have almost enough, sell the S-AFC and use the cash to partially the PowerFC.

With this approach you will probably find you can live longer without an ECU replacement. And you will get most of your money back on the S-AFC so you haven't really lost much money, but gained a pretty good state of tune while you wait for the PowerFC to become affordable.

I think that I have read just about all the threads on this forum about replacement ecu's and as yet can not form an honest opinion on which is better. The PFC certainly has a good reputation but is a little on the dollar rich side whilst the Microtech range appear to offer a good product at the less expensive price range. One thread started to talk about fuel consumption but nothing really substantial was forthcoming. Can anyone who has the PFC and anyone who is using the latest Microtech (LTX-12) please post some honest consumption figures. I think we all agree that both ecu's have the capacity to enable the engine to produce good hp results (when combined with various other mods) so let's see the consumption figures please.

Cheers

how is the microtech less for an R33 ??

You can get a PFC from nungen or greenline for about $1500 with hand controller.

Its the same price for a microtech for me but i get a good price. they are $1800 otherwise with no h/c

Oh!

Sounds like a PFC is the way to go if there is someone around your neck of the woods to tune it. All the info on these threads seem to point towards the PFC as the ecu of choice. Post your consumption figures when you get it in and running. I'm not too interested in what power/torque it will make for you but the fuel consumption side is more of an interest for me. If they are as economical as these threads would have us believe, then I will have an LTX-12 for sale pretty soon.

Cheers

So what's the story on the Z32 AFM upgrade with the Power FC ??

Why would anyone do that ?? What is the benfit ??

How good is the standard RB25 AFM ?? Up to what power can it go ??

What about the injectors and the turbo ??

I'm looking for 230-240kws at the rears.

Would the standard turbo, injectors and AFM handle this if i put a APEXi Power FC ??

Just done an engine conversion, put in a Rb25det into a vl and have replaced standard comp with Microtech. Best and cheapest alternative for all occasions. But I got next model up with hand and external coil driver for a lot less 12 or 13 hundred I think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...