Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol what i really want to know is how that power gets to the ground in a street car?? :(

You can't. That's probably the whole idea.

600rwhp is too much for the street. But f**k it's fun. And hilarious when people coming in the opposite direction move into the bike lane when the see you coming....at an angle.

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah. im thinking 400hp at the rear is enough in a GTST... when you get to 500 thats too much. 600 would just be good for doing some hecktic skids to impress your mates.

This is unbelievable this car.

Trent, do you mind answering some more questions about that car?

Was the stock power FC knock sensors hooked up ? if so what kind of knock readings was it reporting to the ecu ? and how much was the KMON reading ? i am going to have to buy one very soon.

Would there be any chance i could get a copy of the DAT file in that ECU ? i just interested in having a look... :( big ask i know hehe or even a .log file from a couple of power runs from datalogit ? (if you use it that is)

I assume this was a map sensor'd power FC ???

was there any NOS?

Makes me want to go for a road trip and get you to have a look at my car :D

any videos ?

Great result. Nitrous haters mustn't have ever used it. You have no idea.

That's crazy power delivery. I'd imagine that a 700hp car with another 2000rpm in the band would be quicker everywhere though?!?!

Either way that's some serious mumbo.

Great result. Nitrous haters mustn't have ever used it. You have no idea.

That's crazy power delivery. I'd imagine that a 700hp car with another 2000rpm in the band would be quicker everywhere though?!?!

Either way that's some serious mumbo.

I love NOS and most of my V8 streeters have had at least a 150hp kit fitted. The broom below was my daily (back in the street racng days) had 200hp kit fitted... This R34 used no nitrous, all runs were on sunoco high ocatne fuel

As for rev limit your right but on the dyno there was no point reving it past 8400 as the tune from 8400-9200 stayed the same. On the strip the extra rpm defnately would help stretch the top end.

post-34927-1222228181_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1222228203_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
something here doesn't add up...can anybody else pick it?

DO TELL :( the result seems nearly spot on... i spose autosalon will reveal all.

Edited by URAS
DO TELL :(

not trying to detract from what is an awesome machine and well put together and tuned

but somethingis bleedingly obvious from the outset...that im surprised has not been mentioned.

anyway good result Trent...well done.

Edited by DiRTgarage
NONE

:banana: imagine what it would do with it

not trying to detract from what is an awesome machine and well put together and tuned

but somethingis bleedingly obvious from the outset...that im surprised has not been mentioned.

anyway good result Trent...well done.

please explain?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...