Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R31 GTS-R. The sound the thing makes and in race trim watching Seton chase the Sierras in them...in partcular coming over the blind crest into MG at PI. Just way cool car, made all the more cooler by their rarity and their place in motorsport...

R34 for looks and performance

R35 purely for performance, don't particularly like the looks

R32 for looks and performance, 2nd after the R34

R33 is my least fav.

Out of all of them, R34 GTR would be my fav.

1.R33GTS-T By far the best looking. I'm sure more of these were sold than any other by a Long shot.

2.V35GT350/GTR-V35-Hot Fresh new look. GTR Lost 1.st spot for me on the Weight

3.R30-Very light extremly reliable.Best Value car you could buy.

4.R32GTR-wedge lights and squarer body suite GTR flares etc, Good light weight performance

5.R34 - gts or gtr- bit too short Square at rear- overdone big tail lights.

6.C110-great dash

Performance wise- lets face it guys- you get whatever you want done to all the above. So you really have to look at the original design and purpose and how each model performed. Then its individual tastes.

I miss the R33 but my V35 is slowly taking over !

post-55154-1223007801_thumb.jpg

post-55154-1223007834_thumb.jpg

34 GTR becuase of the techonolgy. it looks the best -imo

they aren't as common as other gtr's

32 GTR next because it started all of this. the original godzilla.

33 gtrs dont appeal to me AS much,however still great and a beautiful car.

gts-t's dont amuse me, as they are everywhere, i like things that are less common.

also, i'd much rather awd.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...