Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R31 GTS-R. The sound the thing makes and in race trim watching Seton chase the Sierras in them...in partcular coming over the blind crest into MG at PI. Just way cool car, made all the more cooler by their rarity and their place in motorsport...

R34 for looks and performance

R35 purely for performance, don't particularly like the looks

R32 for looks and performance, 2nd after the R34

R33 is my least fav.

Out of all of them, R34 GTR would be my fav.

1.R33GTS-T By far the best looking. I'm sure more of these were sold than any other by a Long shot.

2.V35GT350/GTR-V35-Hot Fresh new look. GTR Lost 1.st spot for me on the Weight

3.R30-Very light extremly reliable.Best Value car you could buy.

4.R32GTR-wedge lights and squarer body suite GTR flares etc, Good light weight performance

5.R34 - gts or gtr- bit too short Square at rear- overdone big tail lights.

6.C110-great dash

Performance wise- lets face it guys- you get whatever you want done to all the above. So you really have to look at the original design and purpose and how each model performed. Then its individual tastes.

I miss the R33 but my V35 is slowly taking over !

post-55154-1223007801_thumb.jpg

post-55154-1223007834_thumb.jpg

34 GTR becuase of the techonolgy. it looks the best -imo

they aren't as common as other gtr's

32 GTR next because it started all of this. the original godzilla.

33 gtrs dont appeal to me AS much,however still great and a beautiful car.

gts-t's dont amuse me, as they are everywhere, i like things that are less common.

also, i'd much rather awd.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...