Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

has any1 modded or purchesed a custom plemun or modded there existing plenum that actually looks anygood

i have seen modded and custom plenums but im not happy with the look of em.

i would like to mod the existing 1 preferably.

any 1 that has done it or no anything good and bad bout it, info would be much appreciated

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Rb20_4valve

i would like to mod the existing 1 preferably.

that's bad news

they're designed the way they are in order to capture/disperse the air equally

when you move the inlet to the front (I take it this is what you mean?) then you aren't getting equal quantities of air into each cylinder

best way to go if you have to mod your plenum is get some engineered plenum (with the scoops etc) like a sub zero one, or get a brand name one as they've done the work already and have proven results (as far as I'm aware anyway!)

I'd jsut stay with the stock one and increase the tb size, as I read somewhere the other day they have better torque producing figures than the gtr plenum at high revs/boost

Although at the same time I could be talking bs, but that's what I remember

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-509561
Share on other sites

My mate can make a custom plenum on the existing intake runners. Looks very nice, and some of the cars running them have made 400rwhp+, so they work aswell. If you want details then PM me.

I agree that the cut and shut plenums seem like a bad idea, but I have seen a few that still seem to make good power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-509607
Share on other sites

Originally posted by PSIKO

that's bad news

they're designed the way they are in order to capture/disperse the air equally

when you move the inlet to the front (I take it this is what you mean?) then you aren't getting equal quantities of air into each cylinder

The stock plenum has had sweet bugger all engineering into dispersing air evenly. It may do, somewhat, but thats more a matter orf course than design. Nissan's target was to lower the cost of ic piping and shorten its route. That they suceeded at, at the cost of an undersized 'cooler, but even air disperstion was not at the top of their list.

I should take pictures of the stock one I have lying around here. The throttle body is positioned such that it blasts air right down the neck of cylinder 3 and 4. No deflectors or trick engineering gone into it at all. I'd be willing to wager that cylinder 3 and 4 running lean is the cause for a substantional number of rebuilds.

Properly done, a cut'n'shut should have no problems out doing the stock plenums job, just have to take it to someone who has experience with it. If you're still sceptical, consider the number of oem plenums that are front facing log-on-top-of-runner styles: ca18det, sr20det, 4g63, 1jz and 2jz. All very similar to what a cut'n'shut ends up being (especially the last two).

The proof is in the works though and Steve-SST has given mine a thumbs up, so it'll interesting to see how it'll fair.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-511560
Share on other sites

how much for the rb25 tb's? will need one soon for a custom plenum, making it myself with the help of a fabricator so will see how it goes, shoudl save me the 600 he normally charges for this sorta work

also does using a larger tb require aftermarket manangemnt or can i use the safc to clean up the mixtures...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-516480
Share on other sites

DCIEVE, I was going to sell it for $60 on another forum but you can have a SAU discount :). $50. Pic here.

As long as you can mate your current throttle position sensor onto the new throttle body, you shouldn't have many problems with the ecu recognizing the tb. Fueling might be an issue though and a s-afc won't be as good as a remap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-516489
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Gradenko

I should take pictures of the stock one I have lying around here.

In reply to myself, I finally got a pic taken. Not all that clear though. I was holding the plenum "steady" and the half a dozen beers I had before hand had some say in that.

Thats looking down the throttle mounting plate. The light you can see through there is coming in the through the entrance for runner 3 & 4, which is just off the top of the frame. So what happens to air thats blasting in there at 1-odd bar? Some of it hits the runner divider and scatters, but the rest, the majority, takes the path of least resistance to low pressure goodness and ends up in cylinder 3 and 4.

Horrible design.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-516500
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...