Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was talking to people at work and i had a long discussion about this with them but they love their holdens and fords. i want to know who would win if there was a race between the v8s at bathurst and the Mines or MCR or other jap racing GTR teams?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239801-r34-gtr-vs-v8-supercar/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think it would be too hard to determine as you would have to compare lap times...

i doubt any V8 Supercars or the Mines or MCR cars have ever raced on the same track...

response wise, MINES GTR FTW... man that thing is a monster lol

I go to bathurst most years and because of my Mums side of the family who used to race for bob jane i got to meet him and Harry firth who designed the monaro thats were i heard about a "Gt-r" if you go there everyone still talks about i think 92 or 93 the year the GTRs beat like every v8 there, Chances are a Tuned R34 vs V8 Supercar = GTR would win, one of the reasons gtr's won was because of Hicas they had awsome handling and were lightning fast.......So then they banned them because it wasnt "Fair" LOL :)

Benson

^what he said. The V8 supercar is a farken long way removed from anything to do with the road version. The falcon even still races with a pushrod V8 even though the road car doesn't.

Besides, I am yet to see any GTR get close to 298kph down conrod... :)

i think it would be too hard to determine as you would have to compare lap times...

i doubt any V8 Supercars or the Mines or MCR cars have ever raced on the same track...

response wise, MINES GTR FTW... man that thing is a monster lol

are you serious?

you honestly think mines GTR is going to have better response than a track setup V8? lol

If you pored the same about of money, time and expertise into an R34 as they do the v8's, you'd have something that would rival most racing pasta-rockets.

:)

here's one we prepared earlier..

gtrfred.gif

a V6 TT response compared to a V8's response, yeah okay, hard to compete with...

the MINES GTR in general though, i don't think there's many cars out there at all with the V6 TT setup that come close to having response like that machine, in all the videos and time attacks i've seen that car in, the way it revs through all the gears are insane...

i'm just basing my knowledge on how i've seen the car run on the track, that is all... there's nothing wrong with your theory, but i will stand by the fact that every time i've seen that car in action and how responsive it is is insane...

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=v1_8rvMwhhQ

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=i9KJijeXEe4

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=42KwIMakoaE&...feature=related

(best video of all)

some tasty videos

Edited by hoony
The Mines GTR is a road going car with road rubber. It's going to get smashed by the current spec race trim V8 supercars in a race on any circuit you like.

tru dat

even in the short run from hell's corner to corner 2 at bathurst the v8 supertaxis are getting to 255 kph

i would like the mines gtr do that

650hp from a 5 litre pushrod v8 NA vs a 800+hp 2.6litre turbo???

v8 would absolutely eat it

now - awd in a v8 supertaxi?

thats a different story and would be a very interesting scenario

Edited by 342Four

http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/ArticleD...ArticleID=44148

that was written a year ago

even if they could beat it a few years ago, its still a long standing record

Super GT cars today better then V8 Supercars of today?

not sure, they should compare lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...