Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I've got an S13 with an RB25 engine in it, and I'm remapping it myself.

I've got some mild knocking numbers close to the redline (it's got a power-fc pro, so ignition cut on revlimiter), and I'd like to know if there is any difference between the front and back knock sensor...

And for the record, what a/f ratio should I be aiming for at what load level ?

William

the knock sensor signal in the powerfc is presented as a single value, that is, you can't see both

the only way to log both would be to have a multimeter on both signal wires

you sure about that ?

Have you played with the raw logging data that you can save out of the datalogit software and then import it into excel?

It has 2 knock values. they are different values on my engine, the rear of the engine is nosier then the front on mine. which showed up on the stock power fc datalogit knock sensors & on my Gizzmo KMON.

the knock sensor signal in the powerfc is presented as a single value, that is, you can't see both

the only way to log both would be to have a multimeter on both signal wires

Your such a help mate.. lol

Sorry. Start logging with datalogit and when you wish to see what you have run, save the log file or when you disconnect it will ask if you wish to save, open the log file with notepad press controll A. edit copy.

Open microsloth excel and paste into there. Drag down the sticky cells to the cell information and the first knock sensor is there, scroll across to see the second knock sensor.

I delete all the crap i dont need and have a excel file with all the usefull information i need.

one tip, Knock with a power fc.. = BBAAAA BUMMMMMMM totally useless information with anything more then 200 to 240rwkw and above.

you sure about that ?

Have you played with the raw logging data that you can save out of the datalogit software and then import it into excel?

It has 2 knock values. they are different values on my engine, the rear of the engine is nosier then the front on mine. which showed up on the stock power fc datalogit knock sensors & on my Gizzmo KMON.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...