Jump to content
SAU Community

What mod(s) should be done  

15 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I'm relatively new to the skyline seen; however I'm also most certain I have found the one I want.

The Ms has said it needs 4-Doors, so there go the GT-R's also I don't want to inherit too many problems with the car so R34's only and finally she can't drive a turbo, Dam New P Plate laws and cop-magnet car :laugh: !!! So what am I left with 25 GT, GT-X, GT-V or the GT. (let me know if I've missed anything out). I've found a R34 GT-V that has the same specs as the GT-T Less the Turbo. It's done about 75,000 K's and is a manual and is $15,000 (I think due to the lack of turbo I would offer him $12,000-$14,000). First dose the car look worth the $$$.

My second Question is for when She is off her P's in about a year or 2 what to do to up the performance, should I try and find the 2.6 L double overhead cam, electronically fuel-injected, Twin turbo... and drop one of those bad boys in and call it a day... or Get aftermarket turbo exhaust ect... or just use the stock Turbo ect from a RB25DET?

I'm not looking to spend a small fortune only like 3-8G total on performance mods but I'm also looking for Value... all I'm looking for is something a little better than a GT-T, a Falcon, and a Commodore. Something that's not boring, a little impressive but not crazy.

like this

>> :down: <<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/243377-what-to-do-what-to-do/
Share on other sites

as much as i look at doing my car up i keep hitting the conclusion that its more economical in the long run to buy a car with close to the power that i want done the right way, i see a few cars here and there selling because people spend so much time and money in a car they get over it when close to done, i would suggest getting one of those,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...