Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cos think bout it, the PSI will only increase as the air is compressed further, when the air leaves the turbo into the the intercooler and on the way to the intake plenum it stays at the same compression level it already is, just theres more of it trying to get in, the air from another turbo cant compress the air from the first turbo if its at the same PSI. If however one turbo was running 10 psi and one was running 20psi i think, not sure though, you would end up with a total of 15Psi in the motor ??

edit: just thinking as well pressure is relative, 15 psi in a 10lt container is a lot less air than 15 psi in a 20 lt container. so the turbo isn't sending out a static '12 psi' its pushing air until the pipes its filling reach 12psi, both turbos know when that pressure is reached and stop, i guess 2 turbos work half as hard as 1 on its own ?

to answer the first question that doesnt mean theyre both pushing six, cos theyre both a part in the same system, the psi in that system is always the same for both turbos.

the way your thinking about it basically is that both turbo's are sealed off, reach 12 psi in a certain volume. and then both release they're pressurised air into a container the same size as each of the individual originals, but even then it wouldnt create 24 psi cos unless u have 24psi behind it it wont squeeze in

So it doesnt put more air in just puts the same air in faster?

technically i think so, if there both putting out the same amount of air as one, into the same size pipes as 1, at the same rate, it should spool up the same amount of air as 1 turbo in half the time, but theres probably some efficiency loss to the effect of maybe taking 60% of the time of 1 turbo instead of 50%, i dont really know lol, too late to wrap my head around this

plenum...

and yes 2 turbos @ 12psi push twice the volume of air as 1 turbo pushin 12psi. u dont add extra psi just because of another turbo. u could have 5 turbos running 12psi... still gonna be 12psi but with a shit load of air

The turbos still work just as hard as a single turbo because its still spinning @ whatever rpm it needs to make 12psi.

pretty simple stuff really :P

why?

why does two turbos @ 12psi = more power than 1 turbo at 12psi?

pressure != volume

why is map sensor flawed

pressure != volume

why is afm better?

pressure != volume

why does a GT30 make heaps more power at 12psi than a standard turbo?

pressure != volume

bwhahahahaha

why?

why does two turbos @ 12psi = more power than 1 turbo at 12psi?

pressure != volume

why is map sensor flawed

pressure != volume

why is afm better?

pressure != volume

why does a GT30 make heaps more power at 12psi than a standard turbo?

pressure != volume

bwhahahahaha

lol nice work :P

So 2 turbo putting out 12psi are pushing twice the amount of air into the engine than one!

No!

Two turbos pushing the required engine air volume at 12 psi will be the same as a single pushing the same required engine air volume at 12 psi - Temperature being equal and assuming the turbochargers have the capacity to deliver the load.

(P1*V1)T1 = (P2*V2)/T2

P = Pressure

V = Volume

T = Temperature

Edited by WRRR
If an RB26 is running 12psi, is it both turbo running this boost or both running 6psi to make 12psi???
So how does it work then? How can two turbos that make the same boost but don't increase the total boost volume and still make more power??

Good questions!

I too have been wondering about this.

Interesting answers too.

Im no expert on the matter, but from my way of thinking, the PSI is built up by forcing more air into the cylinder as a turbo works more like a 'pump' than a compressor.

The more air (ie volume of air) you bump into the cylinder the more pressure builds up. When this pressure builds up to 12 psi the wastegate opens.

Therefore does that mean that 12 psi from 2 turbos just means that each is generating 6psi. The benefit therefore is quicker build up of boost at lower revs and less strain on each turbo charger.

I thought that PSI is a result of a higher volume of air forced into each cylinder.

Like I said, no expert on the matter.

I just want to understand how it works :cheers:

Edited by noakespg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...