Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd say that depends on who you talk to....

I believe mine runs heaps better with the pod, even before boost increase.

I'm no mechanic so someone will contradict me for sure, lol.

I think on stock it is noticable but depending on mods some say it is less needed, just a good flowing panel filter in the box is best.

if you have FMIC and can make a CAI and a box to cover the pod, may be best option.

also depends on how much flow the particular filter has.

As i said i read through threads in forced induction, they simply compare filters.

My question is different if you take another look...

I just want to know what would be better for a stock R33 GTS-T. A Pod Filter or a Pannel Filter

As i said i read through threads in forced induction, they simply compare filters.

My question is different if you take another look...

I just want to know what would be better for a stock R33 GTS-T. A Pod Filter or a Pannel Filter

Your lucky R31Nismoid has not closed your thread, as there have been a few threads about this and Ash is a true believer in the stock air box FTW.

Your gonna get mixed answers here, cuz its personal preferance and experiance.

I have to HKS pods as it came with the car and they are doing fine.

I would say stock air box or upgraded high flow panel filters are good for about 300 to 400 kWs.

Pods are very good for high end tuned performance cars. As for stock, it does not make much of a difference, pod or panel filter.

Ask Johnny, he did a test on his R34 GTR with an APexi panel filter then twin APexi pod filters and he had quite a gain in kW's.

I now have a pod on my GTST and as for performance i did notice the responsivness was better but not enough difference to notice anything significant, not running any serious mods so may be a lot different for people that are. One thing I did notice for sure is the induction noise, bit louder with the pod on but that could depend on the brand you get as well?

I now have a pod on my GTST and as for performance i did notice the responsivness was better but not enough difference to notice anything significant, not running any serious mods so may be a lot different for people that are. One thing I did notice for sure is the induction noise, bit louder with the pod on but that could depend on the brand you get as well?

Did you have a decent hi-flow panel filter in there before?

My guess is stock nissan or similar, so of course your going to notice a minor difference going from crap to a decent flowing filter setup.

If stock airboxes can make 400rwkw on BIG GTR's (with the side airbox restrictor thingo removed for the flow in R34's)

Good enough for run of the mill setups below that, plenty of threads on it, Dezz even posted some dyno results which showed such little difference it wasnt worth going pods due to factoring in increased intake temps

ok here is the thread.

This is about airbox with lid on/off

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ai...html&hl=pod

And read the whole thread, interesting points come up over the course of it, and ideas etc

... just get a high flow panel filter like r31nismoid said.

I have a Trust Airinx-GT panel filter in my Stag, is that considered rubbish or should i get a better one? Like Pipercross or something else? Any recommendations? < $100. Or are they all much of a muchness.

Edited by webng

There is no distinct answer, there are so many factors that can influence the results. Mainly if you standard airbox/filter set-up isn't a restriction than you'll see little to no power/response change.

However lets not kid ourselves must people swap to a pod set-up for the induction noise, any upgrade in performance comes as a bonus. :P

I have a Trust Airinx-GT panel filter in my Stag, is that considered rubbish or should i get a better one? Like Pipercross or something else? Any recommendations? < $100. Or are they all much of a muchness.

id go Jap stuff, but thats just me. Pipercross doesnt have panel filters for Skylines

just clean your current one

i am still running my airbox with a k&n (fmic, pfc, avcr, exhaust) and at my last dyno session it was causing a restriction. it seems the issue is with the mouth of the airbox. so if you don't plan on modifying your car, the stock airbox is ok after that though you might need a pod or modify your airbox.

Well from reading it looks like the best option for a stock car is just a hi flow panel filter.

Summer coming up and all will mean higher intake temps unless you get a partition which will set you back another $100 and from what people have said it will make very very little difference if any.

So hi-flow pannel filter

-Cheaper

-Defect free

-Lower intake temps on hot days

Pod Filter

-Intake noise

-Better for highly modified cars

This brings me to my next question on Hi-Flow Pannel Filters..

What kinds are there?

What is the best one(s)?

Thanks guys!

I personally wouldn't recommend using a oiled filter with a hot wire air mass meter set-up. The filament is extremely sensitive and it's common for excess oil to bake onto it and render the units useless.

K&N filters are unfortunately an oiled set-up, most Japanese brands are note.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...