Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

haha thought that might stir you up...

mine went 574 @ 24psi thank you very much!!!

plus it also went 560rwhp at 20psi but yoda backed off timing so it was nice and safe :)

brockas should make anywhere between 560-600rwhp i would imagine, hopefully 573.9 so I can give him shit for years to come :banana:

i know you were stirring, i dont think ive seen a non-stirring post from you yet. :)

Yer i agree on brockas figures, he has pretty big cams so that should help alot, i think he has no port work on the head at all from memory? im thinking 575hp on the roller and 625hp or so on the hubber.

Im keen on those precision turbos mentioned, they seem pretty good from what ive read up but cant find prices anywhere and any real solid info on them, like are they watercooled and ballbearing, t4 flanged, twin scroll?

Edited by unique1
270 it is then. .1L shouldnt make a huge difference anyways.

It's not even 0.1L

RB26 isn't a true 2600cc. It is less.

IIRC its about 70cc difference RB25 to RB26

Have any of you guys running rb26's in your gtr with either to4z or GT35r got upgraded valves/springs etc in your top end or what have you had to do besides cams in the top end?

just wondering how a stock head will go on a built bottom end with say a GT35R? interested in this thread, coz im tossing up which way to go down the track a bit.

You can get the Billet Turbos in Journal or Ball Bearing. Wide variety of T3 and T4 exhaust housings are available. There are different compressor housing options as well. About 1000$ for the Journal version and 1400$ for the Ball Bearing version i think. Contact a turbo destributor and ask about the Precision Billet 6765. There are a couple being sold on ebay as well.

Have any of you guys running rb26's in your gtr with either to4z or GT35r got upgraded valves/springs etc in your top end or what have you had to do besides cams in the top end?

just wondering how a stock head will go on a built bottom end with say a GT35R? interested in this thread, coz im tossing up which way to go down the track a bit.

Stock head, with the only work done for clearance of the 10.8mm cams, and upgraded springs.

Valves are standard.

Stock head, with the only work done for clearance of the 10.8mm cams, and upgraded springs.

Valves are standard.

ok. thanks, interesting to know what others have done etc for there set ups, gives others a chance to compare and see where the best place to spend your cash is in an engine build up process.

^ plenty of guys running @ 380-400rwkw, factory valves/cams and bit of a tidy up.

More depends on the condition of the head to begin with really, one person might be fine, you might not and vice versa

^ plenty of guys running @ 380-400rwkw, factory valves/cams and bit of a tidy up.

More depends on the condition of the head to begin with really, one person might be fine, you might not and vice versa

yeah totally agree. i would get the head fully rebuilt when it goes back on once i do the engine, just to make sure everything is going to run smoothly.

also what manifolds are people running? has this has much of an affect also? in the future im looking at maybe a GT35R on highmount manifold (most likely 6boost) just slowly planning it all first and what parts i need to aquire.

Car run in..

Getting tuned end of this week/ next week ...

Will post results..

Built 26... garrett .84 t04z

Been a long wait... good luck!

  • 2 weeks later...
I'm about to bolt on a T04Z with .81 rear housing, so we will have a direct comparison, on the same dyno with the same engine, between a GT35R and T04Z.

Should be finished by next week.

any results on this?

Was just about to post here.

No results just yet.

As it needs a complete retune anyway, we've taken the opportunity to install a Power FC d-jetro, and get rid of the AFM's.

Unfortunately, this makes it no longer a 'bolt off bolt on' situation, but the lack of AFM's shouldn't really effect top end much, just driveability.

Power FC arrives next week, hopefully tuned on Thursday/Friday.

has anyone had both these set-ups on a car before or seen them on cars. im looking at the exact same problem.. cant choose which one

has anyone had both these set-ups on a car before or seen them on cars. im looking at the exact same problem.. cant choose which one

Give me a week...

*prays to the gods

573.9

573.9

573.9

Scali's using Natalotto's map as a base for mine, so here's hoping I smash your figure haha

Edited by Brockas
  • 2 weeks later...
Was just about to post here.

No results just yet.

As it needs a complete retune anyway, we've taken the opportunity to install a Power FC d-jetro, and get rid of the AFM's.

Unfortunately, this makes it no longer a 'bolt off bolt on' situation, but the lack of AFM's shouldn't really effect top end much, just driveability.

Power FC arrives next week, hopefully tuned on Thursday/Friday.

Hows the results for this coming along?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...