Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Very interesting read. Also interesting to note those are almost the exact same measurements of my compressor (60mm inducer, 84mm exducer). I wonder if that test will change some minds? :P

*Edit--I just noticed the GT35r they compared it too was a twin scroll housing. Are most of the GT30/35's out there twin scroll?

To my knowledge none of the GT30/35's are twin scroll in their off the shelf format.

ATP modifies the T3 TS GT32 ex housing to suit the 3071/76/GT35. Full-race also is putting together T4 TS footprint ex housings for the GT35. In the above test they are testing a T4 TS GT35 with a T4 TS BW - so its a valid comparison. Presumably both of these twin scroll turbo's will outspool and have better transient response than a generic single scroll GT35.

Edited by juggernaut1
  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think it's actually the compressor and turbine design in general. The B-W's with out the extended as well as there cousins (holsets) all have the same characteristic of really outperforming thier garrett counterparts at higher boost levels. I guess it might have to do with originaly being designed to run on a diesel at over 2 bar. I think most of them are mapped to 3 bar. I'm thinking about getting meth injection and punching the boost up to around 2 bar. I'm at 1.7 now with under 20 counts of knock (again, stock bottom end).

**Cliff notes for anybody who didn't feel like clicking that link that juggernaut posted-- Borg-Warner S300 spooled exactly the same if not a little quicker than a twin scroll GT35r and made around 15 more hp starting from the midrange on up on back to back dyno runs on the same car (Evo).

that is a dinosar :P it is of a 6.7 litre cummins powered earth mover. it was designed to diliver a scud of torque at very small rev range. about 2600 to 3200 rpm. it has a strange anti surge ring machined into the compressor housing and the compressor wheel has notches that fit into the ring. on an rb25 it would see boost at around 5500 to 6000 rpm :)

the one you want to go for is a hx35 ;) not one of these

aaaaahhhhhh, i thought it sounded fair big lol.

thanks heaps for the info mate, dont worry i am definatley going a hx35 :D .

just hunting one down at the moment.

thanks everyone for the help,

btw american dollar going down meening these bad boys are getting cheaper for us wooohooo!

im watching the news everyday, the AUSD gets 1cent stronger everyday lol.

Gezza

Personally I think the BW's are the ones to watch , IMO along a bit more modern lines than HE/HX35 Holsets .

Actually it's just occured to me that if you people want to play with cheapish diesel turbos why not revert to the old chestnut T04/60-1 ? There is actually a range of compressors in that family so you don't have to use the 60 trim version if you don't want to .

T4 turbine housings are common in single or twin entry and "T3" or T4 mounting flange sizes .

It's even made with a large frame ball bearing option if you like .

A .

Disco, you refer to them as "old", but they are out performing the "new" GT series in every way I can measure--or do you disagree on that point? Again, looking for good honest opinions. I like having a nice intelligent discussion about these things, so please don't think I'm being argumentative.

I do agree though that the B-W's come on a couple hundred RPM quicker and flow a lb or two more up top. They are a bit more modern design, but what is that performance difference when I can get a used Holset for $200USD compared to a B-W for $1200USD new? I'd go B-W all things being equal, but I'm not rich :banana:

Edited by Cjmartz2k
  • 2 months later...
Evo + HX52 = skyline in the rear view.

You are clearly assuming/hoping that the Skyline isn't similarly equipped :P There were Skylines running around on the streets of Japan ten years ago with the same power or more than what you'd make with an EVO with an HX52.

bozodos - What do you mean by the appropriate sizes? Suitable turbine housing size or..? I treat the HX35 as roughly equivalent to a GT30R.

Power to weight ratio........ 4wd advantage for the non R types

Quite keen to see these videos of 7s runs?

bozodos - What do you mean by the appropriate sizes? Suitable turbine housing size or..? I treat the HX35 as roughly equivalent to a GT30R.

Quite keen to see these videos of 7s runs?

Ask and ye shall receive:

Don't mis-quote me. I never said that Skylines don't have potential. Right now I am in the process of building my Evo up (melted a piston and decided to go bigger) to match up with a 1000awhp sexy beast of a GT-R.

They are running Garretts, and that EVO is tube front - there are no tube frame GTRs that I am aware of and Shep last I heard may have given up on the AWD chase.

Edited by Lithium

To add to that.

For someone looking to build a preformance car on a budget these are the turbines to use. I have a 800+HP capable turbine and I got it for $100 US + shipping. The GT35R I had on previously was $1300US + shipping and is only rated to 650HP at the top of the map where I was not boosting.

The car we've been tuning recently is a stock 25 block with a 26 head boosting 1.7 bar on the HX52 and maxing out 740CC injectors.

Edited by radix

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...