Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks guys for all the information on the forum. ( I used a lot the SEARCH button)

I am very happy with the performance of our GTR R33. First day at the 1/4 mile track we run 4 passes 11.4, 11.0, 10.82 and 10.61

We run with SUNOCO Race Fuels GT PLus 104 octane unleaded.

The car is a single turbo power FC +600whp tunned by Cristian Penson @

C-WORKS shop sponsored by Zero Wheels and omegaxenon.com

And after the first visit to the track it become the fastest Nissan in Dominican Republic.

We look foward for better times on 2009. :banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249485-1061-14-mile-first-day-at-track/
Share on other sites

440rwkw will throw you deeper mate, keep the R&D going with that power as there is still faster ET's to be had!

Great work!

What turbo/tyres outta interest?

Im guessing GT35 if your running 104, a a T04Z should do that on 98 (whever the equiv is over there)

440rwkw will throw you deeper mate, keep the R&D going with that power as there is still faster ET's to be had!

Great work!

What turbo/tyres outta interest?

Im guessing GT35 if your running 104, a a T04Z should do that on 98 (whever the equiv is over there)

The car makes 600whp on a 4 wheel dyno.

Borg Warner S300 series single turbo conversion.

4 slicks tires 26"

Edited by 95GTR600

what are your 60ft time on slicks?

440rwkw has seen very low 10s on semi's, not full slicks...

Get that 60ft down (which is where i expect your loosing the time) and see a 9 without a doubt on slicks

what are your 60ft time on slicks?

440rwkw has seen very low 10s on semi's, not full slicks...

Get that 60ft down (which is where i expect your loosing the time) and see a 9 without a doubt on slicks

first 1.59

best 1.50

There is an easy gain if you can grab second before you hit limiter.. sounds like it bounced of it at least 2 times.. thats gotta be worth .1 of a second. Keep up the good work! Out of curiosity, whats your response like with that turbo compared to say, a Garret t04z which is in the same power range.

There is an easy gain if you can grab second before you hit limiter.. sounds like it bounced of it at least 2 times.. thats gotta be worth .1 of a second. Keep up the good work! Out of curiosity, whats your response like with that turbo compared to say, a Garret t04z which is in the same power range.

You are right, it was my first time running a RHD car... but I agree with you about hit limiter.

I love the Borg Wagner turbo...a friend has one Honda producing 800whp @ 36 lbs of boost.

We got full boost at 5,200rpms.

We will try to make things better next time.

Edited by 95GTR600
what are your 60ft time on slicks?

440rwkw has seen very low 10s on semi's, not full slicks...

Get that 60ft down (which is where i expect your loosing the time) and see a 9 without a doubt on slicks

What should be a decent 0-60 ft ?

Do you think factory rear differential will hold the power ?

  • 2 weeks later...
Nice work, is it S362 or bigger? Going by that dyno power and trap speed I am guessing it was tuned on a hub dyno or something?

it's a S372 with a S400 label. I did not understand well about it. But I am very happy with the turbo and the whole car.

We look foward for better times when the track is open again.

Does anyone knows what we have to do in order to make 1.3x on 0-60f with slicks ? Which way to do a good burn out without damage the case, etc. ?

Edited by 95GTR600
it's a S372 with a S400 label. I did not understand well about it. But I am very happy with the turbo and the whole car.

We look foward for better times when the track is open again

Damn mate thats a big turbo you have there, and pretty good spool for a turbo of that size too - probably got more in it :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...