Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

1. Giancarlo Fisichella, Force India, 648kg

2. Jarno Trulli, Toyota, 656.5

3. Nick Heidfeld, BMW Sauber, 655

4. Rubens Barrichello, Brawn GP, 644.5

5. Robert Kubica, BMW Sauber, 649

6. Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari, 655

7. Timo Glock, Toyota, 648.5

8. Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, 662.5

9. Mark Webber, Red Bull, 658

10. Nico Rosberg, Williams, 670

11. Adrian Sutil, Force India, 678.5

12. Lewis Hamilton, McLaren, 693.5

13. Fernando Alonso, Renault, 684.4

14. Jenson Button, Brawn GP, 694.2

15. Heikki Kovalainen, McLaren, 697

16. Sebastien Buemi, Toro Rosso, 685

17. Jaime Alguersuari, Toro Rosso, 704.5

18. Kazuki Nakajima, Williams, 706.1

19. Romain Grosjean, Renault, 704.7

20. Luca Badoer, Ferrari, 691.5

Yeh, i can see some caebag up front as ppl back themselves for a win. I thinl Trulli has to be favourite. I wonder if Kimi can get it off the line from where he is?

RBR may get some points bt another shocking weekend means that you have to say they are letting a great opportunity pass them by...ditto Brawn are choking and not performing

the BMW guys suddenly finding a lot of pace. no drive seems to motivate the non-event guys like it did with heikki last week.

All three of them dont deserve their seats, while guys like roseberg putt around in cars far below their talent level.

Oddly enough Rubens looks good for the double, its all over for button. he might still get the WDC, but wins look past him

This is the first time i am watchng a GP on a racetrack i have driven and it blows my mind the speeds they are doing through the corners and where they brake! I am such a hack, i want to go back to Spa now, i reckon i can cut 5s of lmy best time :)

And Webz in real trouble with Hamo just behind him. Can only hope that with some fresh blood backing themselves for a GP win up front that there is some carnage and 3-4 have trouble on the opening lap, inc Rubesn ... Shame i have to wish carnage on other drivers bt Webz needs a hand out :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After using a protractor for an actually accurate assessment of what is required,  and by NOT using my uncalibrated eyeball I worked out I need a 25° silicone bend from the TB ro the MAF, but, my choice was either a 30° or a 23° (23° is a weird spec), so I grabbed the 23° one from Raceworks I also grabbed 1mtr of 3" straight from Just Jap, I needed 350mm, but they only had 300mm, or 1mtr lengths....meh Also ordered a 1/2" hose bulkhead fitting from fleabay, this has a smoothish mushroom looking head (they are designed for below the water line of boats) that will fit inside the bend, the hose bit and threaded bit looks to long, but nothing that a hacksaw cannot fix if required, the hose will then just get jamed on the threaded bit up to the retaining nut Fingers crossed and the unsightly amount of hose clamps will be reduced down to 4 once all the parts arrive 
    • Oil change does not trigger code 21. Code 21 is for coilpacks primary side connection. You can try to clear the code with a battery disconnect, hold down the brake pedal to drain capacitors through the brake lights with the ignition on for 10-15 seconds before you reconnect the battery. I have seen R35 coil conversion permanently cause this code with no ill effects so it might be the resistance it wants to see isn't quite right on one or more coilpacks. Could be inside the ECU, could be the harness, could be a coil. You can test it all if you want or just ignore until the car actually starts misfiring.
    • I forgot you have a Nistune ECU. Use Nistune to do all the tests I mentioned instead of faffing with 30+ year old electrical connectors. You can read MAF volts off that too, there are reference values in the service manual to tell you roughly what it should be in different conditions.
    • No. I think it might be the AFM. Hence the use of the terms "swaptronics", which implies the use of swapping out electronics for the purpose of diagnosis. It's about the only way to prove that a small/niggling/whatever problem with an AFM or a CAS or similar is actually caused by that AFM/CAS/whatever. A known good item swapped in that still gives the same problem is likely to be caused somewhere else. They're all the same. Spraying AFMs with cleaner is an each way bet between cleaning it and f**king it.
    • Oh wow! This might actually work amazingly. Do you know the ratio of the diff? I was told the only thing you need to make sure of is if the front & rear diff ratios are the same. Ours is a 4.083 Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...