Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got my bilstein/whiteline kit from sydneykid on xmas eve, put swaybars, front/rear shocks and springs in just after new years. did anone else have any issues with knocking sounds going over bumps in the front and rear? inserted a rubber stop from the stock front suspension under the top bolt and that fixed the front, just wondering if we missed something installing them? had 2 mechanics helping and they are sure everything was done correctly. Rear's knock a fair bit over fast bumps too as if the shock is crashing up to strut top. any ideas? we had to use the stock strut tops on the new kit too. Tried searching on the forums but my uselessness couldn't find much.

I'm having the same issue's as you are at the moment with the SK suspension but only on the front end (r33).

I've cut the bump stops down to the point where they're nearly doing nothing :P. While the car is on the ground you can see and feel the travel between the bump stop and the strut top is just under an inch!

My front shocks bottom out over smooth speed bump at a normal speed and I dread pot holes of any size.

I think the shock absorbers provided do not suit the application. They don't have enough travel to suit the car or the spring. The only cost effective way I can see to fix the issue is to get heavier springs, which will make the already bad ride quality worse.

Anyone else having these issues please post here.

Edited by BAMR33
I'm having the same issue's as you are at the moment with the SK suspension but only on the front end (r33).

I've cut the bump stops down to the point where they're nearly doing nothing :D. While the car is on the ground you can see and feel the travel between the bump stop and the strut top is just under an inch!

My front shocks bottom out over smooth speed bump at a normal speed and I dread pot holes of any size.

I think the shock absorbers provided do not suit the application. They don't have enough travel to suit the car or the spring. The only cost effective way I can see to fix the issue is to get heavier springs, which will make the already bad ride quality worse.

Anyone else having these issues please post here.

I have heard of some cases about the front's not having much travel, even at the normal circlip height.

Does anyone else have the same problem?

Is it just a limitation of the Skyline front suspension, or has it got to do with the Bilsteins?

I've had it 2 below and then 1 and now normal circlip height. It bottomed out often at the 2 below height on speed bumps. Much less (maybe a third as much) on 1 below and only twice in 3 months since putting at normal height. Bump stops should not be cut too low as they help if you are always hitting the end of travel. I suggest putting it at normal height, that extra 8mm will help a lot.

Or get higher rated springs (I think about 10 - 20% more than the King/whiteline springs would have been a better anyway.)

Ohh and I live in a back street in Westend, I take about 20 speed bumps to and from work each day at about 30kmh.

Edited by simpletool

i managed to sort out the fronts by using 2 2mm washers with a 15mm rubber between then above the strut top and below the shock end bolt, this fixed all knocking issues from the front. Plan to do the same at the rear. One thing ive noticed is that during mild to hard cornering where theres a slight undulation in the road i do notice a slight scrape sound, could be wheel raising up and making slight contact with inner guard plastic or even front bar (front bar goes pretty close to wheels when they go lock to lock)

might take some snaps when we do my car this weekend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...