Jump to content
SAU Community

Stretched Tyres For Track Days


Recommended Posts

how many V8 supercars do you see with fully sick stretched rear tyres onto 11ty billion inch width rear rims?

how many rally cars do you see with stretched tyres?

how many F1 cars do you see with stretched tyres?

If it was any performance benefit these boys would be all over it before you'd even heard of it.

if we're talking about performance, then the right size spec tyre (near vertical sidewalls, if a little leant over toward to tread) will perform the best.

you don't see lambos, fezzas, porkers coming from factory with a 225 on a 10 inch rim, for a reason.

definately, but that has already been covered, no one is debating that. we are talking about whether its safe.

i know personally i have stretched over the years for drift, whether it be due to tyre availability or simply looking for tight, predicable sidewalls, never had an issue, but u will lose grip.

saying that, it depends on the tyre, if all ur running is cheap street tyres, then sometimes some stretch is better, over the years ive sometimes had street tyres on the front which have soft sidewalls, and found that stretching them a bit (225 on 9" kind of stretch) actually helped as it stopped the sidewalls from flopping around. saying that if ur running proper performance tyres with strong sidewalls, there is no need to stretch, and you will lose grip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont stretch the tyres!

Get the right tyre for the rim. I will be using a 255 on my 9" rims on my Silvia racecar. So with 10's I would say you will need the 265's all round.

My RX7 racecar runs 225's on a 7" rim and that works fine.

You need some sidewall flex in the tyres, if you stretch the tyres you will find the tyres will tuck under and roll on the edges. The slip angles will also be reduced making hard to balance the car on the edge of grip and slide

Ashly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got 235/40 on my front 18x8.5's and 255's on my 18x9.5's. It works really well for me, only a slight undersize on both, which is not considered stretch.

I'd recommend 265/35's for you, or you could go 275/35's if you don't have guard issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

definately, but that has already been covered, no one is debating that. we are talking about whether its safe.

i know personally i have stretched over the years for drift, whether it be due to tyre availability or simply looking for tight, predicable sidewalls, never had an issue, but u will lose grip.

saying that, it depends on the tyre, if all ur running is cheap street tyres, then sometimes some stretch is better, over the years ive sometimes had street tyres on the front which have soft sidewalls, and found that stretching them a bit (225 on 9" kind of stretch) actually helped as it stopped the sidewalls from flopping around. saying that if ur running proper performance tyres with strong sidewalls, there is no need to stretch, and you will lose grip.

thanks nisskid for staying on the subject whether its safe or not.

and thanks for the input guys im thinking of 255/35 all round or 255/35 f 265/35 for a bit more rear traction cos my 17/255/40 are just no good.also are staged size tires better for track or not as ive noticed a lot of front and rear being the same size on FR cars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had 255/30 on my 9.5" rims on my 33 gtst and they were great.. stretched 235/35s for drift and it made a huge difference to the grip levels... the back end became all sorts of slippery.... for a track day... i say dont stretch the tyres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had 255/30 on my 9.5" rims on my 33 gtst and they were great.. stretched 235/35s for drift and it made a huge difference to the grip levels... the back end became all sorts of slippery.... for a track day... i say dont stretch the tyres.

hardly a fair comparison though, firstly i doubt they were the same brand and model tyre (might have been tho), 2ndly ur reducing the size by 20mm each size, of course ur going to have less grip, that doesnt mean the stretch was responsible for lower grip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes you're right, its not a fair comparo... what i should have said was.. drifting was much easier and more controllable with the stretched 235s as it felt much stiffer and more responsive in the back end.. that was without spinning the wheels until after the apex where power was starting to be applied and yes, the 235s had much less grip which made power oversteer much easier..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeh a stretched tyre is much more tight, responsive and easy to control, hence why a lot of drifters that arent high level who get good tyres given to them (with strong sidewalls etc) use stretch with cheaper tyres.

as far as grip though, a 235 on a 8.5" and a 235 on a 10" would be a better comparison for stretch vs non-stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how many V8 supercars do you see with fully sick stretched rear tyres onto 11ty billion inch width rear rims?

how many rally cars do you see with stretched tyres?

how many F1 cars do you see with stretched tyres?

If it was any performance benefit these boys would be all over it before you'd even heard of it.

if we're talking about performance, then the right size spec tyre (near vertical sidewalls, if a little leant over toward to tread) will perform the best.

you don't see lambos, fezzas, porkers coming from factory with a 225 on a 10 inch rim, for a reason.

its simple more width, more grip (with exceptions) and from what I understand v8 super cars, f1 and WRC etc run tyres with a stiffer side wall compared to a regular car or sport(road) tyre

Just out of interest in terms of the actual structure of a tyre, how does a semi slick compare to a normal road tyre, do they have stiffer walls, or are they the same, just diffrent compound and tread pattern??

cheers

elliot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...