Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

link in your sig is fine. posts soliciting feedback I need to think about. not sure what kind of forum that would be suitable in. we generally don't allow people making posts to solicit participation in other forums/websites etc.

link in your sig is fine. posts soliciting feedback I need to think about. not sure what kind of forum that would be suitable in. we generally don't allow people making posts to solicit participation in other forums/websites etc.

I understand that. particularly a site that is out to make a profit..

but it seems for legal reasons SAU is definitely not willing to host any tuner/workshop feedback that is negative

so this is why I'd be interested in providing this service, and hopefully members would use it and find it useful.

I wonder if SAU would accept paid advertising for it, as a worst case scenario (for me).

this is what enthusiasts need

but needs a very well set out fill in the box style like a survey and a box with a 5000 word limit so you can put it into words

absolutely. Like gumtree: no need to take membership to add a review, but verify by email before

publishing. A way to upload supporting evidence (pictures, dyno charts, whatever). A way to contact

the reviewer privately without giving away email addresses. A way to challenge or comment on a

review, promote well written ones and suppress doubtful or obvious hit jobs.

and, apparently, offshore hosting and ownership so that the allegedly terrifying libel laws here are

less of a liability (although I don't really believe tuners and workshops would be systematically out

to abuse the law in order to protect bad business practices).

honestly it is overdue that the better tuners/shops/dealers are easier to find than word of mouth

and the bad ones can only be whispered about in hushed tones.

SAU's stance is clear.

In my view - if you even go as far as to link it in your sig - it'll be removed.

Least of all starting a thread about feedback - absolutely not going to happen.

Ye it sounds like im being a prick, ye i am & furthermore i do not care.

The rules here are clear, and simple. You agree to them when you sign up.

SAU will be in NO WAY responsible or seen to be associated with a website of the nature that allows people to make false and misleading claims about a workshops work.

Just because you dont agree with the rules, you think we are going to allow it to go on in a 'round-a-bout' way? Oh please.

End of story as far as i see it.

SAU's stance is clear.

In my view - if you even go as far as to link it in your sig - it'll be removed.

Least of all starting a thread about feedback - absolutely not going to happen.

Ye it sounds like im being a prick, ye i am & furthermore i do not care.

The rules here are clear, and simple. You agree to them when you sign up.

SAU will be in NO WAY responsible or seen to be associated with a website of the nature that allows people to make false and misleading claims about a workshops work.

Just because you dont agree with the rules, you think we are going to allow it to go on in a 'round-a-bout' way? Oh please.

End of story as far as i see it.

Sounds like an aggressive stand, yes. And to be honest, the stance of SAU is clear,

they won't host this content. Beyond that, though, the stance isn't clear which is why I asked.

It is a bit of a stretch to assume, before such a site exists, that such a place

"would allow people to make false and misleading claims". Unless your interpretation

is that any end-user written report is by definition false and misleading?

In that case, then SAU is guilty of allowing people to make false and misleading claims

about nismo, OS Giken, Garrett, HKS and a host of other companies, every single day.

Because we frequently post that such and such a product or company is or is not good, and

nobody from SAU investigates to make sure the claim isn't false or misleading, or made

by a bozo.

My reasoning for suggesting the service goes like this: 1. the expressed (by the site owner)

reason for this rule is simply legal liability.

2. I think many people would find such a place EXCEEDINGLY useful. They aren't children,

just because someone posted, say, Croydon sucks, that doesn't mean that viewers would

destroy their business.

If there was a site that offered a place to index experiences with

workshops the same way we exhaustively compare turbos or brake companies, then

the legal liability risk is removed, and everyone would be happy (except the worst

workshop). And if this was my project, I'm not sure why it would be ban worthy for me to

have it included in my .sig.

Edited by r34nur

I didnt say ban worthy - i said it would not be removed. Please ensure you are clear about what i said, as its as clear as it can be.

There are two sides to every story, and having been around for many years, often the two sides are vastly different.

If you are going to allow people to 'review' a workshop and bag them out, how do you even know thats the truth? You dont.

Ive made the point clear, do not attempt to promote it here. Thats twice ive said it now, i wont be informing you a 3rd time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...