Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well out of 3x 32's that I personally know over here all making the same power (my RB30 making an early 250rwhp, and two mates with RB20's sporting 25 turbos and all the usually bolt on stuff.. one untuned the other a de+t tuned), we've all run 102/103mph.

yeh thats around what you would expect for the mods listed. 100mph on the stock computer boost and turbo like the others are running is going well!

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

these things are about as accurate as counting. i have seen another app using teh built in gps and tested on 2 phones at the same time in the same car. readings were over 1 second apart.

Yeh I can't really vouch for the accuracy seeing as ive never tested it against a real timed run. But I chose this app over about five similar ones due to several tests and reviews by different motoring blogs and others saying it's quite close to true. Within 0.1 on a 1/4 and +- 5% in power. And it does read consistent times I had three in a row. 14.62, 14.46, 14.42. Then changed launch style and got 14.01

Maybe their track is just a bit longer than a 1/4 mile :D

eheh, no it's a very good track, NHRA approved here in Canada.

Went with my friend who also have an R32 with same bolt-on as me and he managed a 98mph .. guess I'm a good driver :) Still need to take these 60ft down. I did 97mph when my clutch started to slip on me.

Some of the discrepancies btn your GPS system and the track may be due to the rollout at the track.

Couple of years ago Motor magazine tested a Porche at the quarter and had their VBox (GPS based testing system) strapped in the car as well. The result was that the VBox showed a slower time by around a 10th than the track timer - which was put down to the rollout. The car was already doing around 8klm an hour before the timing beams were triggered at the track compared to their VBox which starts timing from the time the car starts moving.

Yeh I can't really vouch for the accuracy seeing as ive never tested it against a real timed run. But I chose this app over about five similar ones due to several tests and reviews by different motoring blogs and others saying it's quite close to true. Within 0.1 on a 1/4 and +- 5% in power. And it does read consistent times I had three in a row. 14.62, 14.46, 14.42. Then changed launch style and got 14.01

Hopefully the time is correct, but 160rwkw from a cooled and zorsted RB20 is an all mighty ask. I definitely wouldnt think the power is accurate at all imo.

If its true, im selling up, because thats what my nearly standard neo makes! :)

Yeh I thought that was high. But I've already had a few surprises from this car so I'm thinking it's possibly got a chipped / tuned ECU

Also brass button clutch may be helping my MPH

I still don't believe this whole 2-3psi extra crap with a full exhaust. I have to dial in 25% duty increase into the ebc to get 12psi (with a 10psi actuator) and I've got as free flowing exhaust as possible.

Im skeptical of producing fly wheel kilowatts are the rear wheels with only a zorst and a cooler. But all dynos are different, the mph is where its backed up. And a 160rwkw 32 should def be passing 100mph like most are saying theirs are :)

Hmmm zorst and cooler and 206rwkw, now that sounds nice:D

I still don't believe this whole 2-3psi extra crap with a full exhaust. I have to dial in 25% duty increase into the ebc to get 12psi (with a 10psi actuator) and I've got as free flowing exhaust as possible.

ive had dyno print out's done after every modification and at one case a before/after dyno run on the same day after installing an intercooler.

Both dyno runs were done on the same day, seperated by a couple of hours. Full exhaust, stock ecu, standard actuator etc

As you can see it jumps up to 13psi where it drops down afterwards

1574kwmh7.th.jpg

Im skeptical of producing fly wheel kilowatts are the rear wheels with only a zorst and a cooler. But all dynos are different, the mph is where its backed up. And a 160rwkw 32 should def be passing 100mph like most are saying theirs are :D

Hmmm zorst and cooler and 206rwkw, now that sounds nice:D

How is it any different from r33's doing 180kw on nothing more on exhaust and fmic? After all, thats what they produce flywheel too :)

Please do some reading up in both rb20/rb25 turbo upgrade threads to get a better idea

well I have a peak boost of 0.85 BAR which I think is 12.3 PSI ? Stock boost in rb20 is 12 psi. So no huge increase for me. Will have to attend next whoop as Wednesday and see how I go.

Edit: boost reading is from my defi guage. ... Not my iPhone :)

well I have a peak boost of 0.85 BAR which I think is 12.3 PSI ? Stock boost in rb20 is 12 psi. So no huge increase for me. Will have to attend next whoop as Wednesday and see how I go.

stock boost in a rb20 is 10psi due to the 10psi actuator on the standard turbo.

Hence why r33 owners put rb20 actuators on their rb25 turbo's to get 10psi :)

How is it any different from r33's doing 180kw on nothing more on exhaust and fmic? After all, thats what they produce flywheel too :D

Please do some reading up in both rb20/rb25 turbo upgrade threads to get a better idea

Yeh its definitely not any different, and I dont believe many R33's would be making 180rwkw on just a cooler and zorst either lol.

Considering they put out 130-140rwkw stocko, throwing a zorst and cooler on for an extra 40rwkw is a pretty good gain!

In the end all figures are useless anyway. MPH is the true test, so lets hope the thread starter gets the 32 to the track and can get some good mph

Im a jealous 25 owner here, I cant handle figures so easily near mine ok :) jks

Edited by Granthem
ive had dyno print out's done after every modification and at one case a before/after dyno run on the same day after installing an intercooler.

Both dyno runs were done on the same day, seperated by a couple of hours. Full exhaust, stock ecu, standard actuator etc

As you can see it jumps up to 13psi where it drops down afterwards

1574kwmh7.th.jpg

All that sheet shows is that your setup spikes.. if it was running 13psi I would expect to see 13psi solid, not tapering back to ACTUATOR PRESSURE..

Here are my shitty boost curves from the old RB20 and the current RB30 (I have since smoothed out the intial spike and that little hump).

RB20_dyno.jpg

RB30_dyno.jpg

One instance does not a generalisation make..

All that sheet shows is that your setup spikes.. if it was running 13psi I would expect to see 13psi solid, not tapering back to ACTUATOR PRESSURE..

Here are my shitty boost curves from the old RB20 and the current RB30 (I have since smoothed out the intial spike and that little hump).

One instance does not a generalisation make..

my sheet shows that due to the exhaust and fmic, the boost is larger than the factory 10psi.

You can see that the whole run (the blue line) stays above 10psi right till the end. So regardless if its not holding a solid 13psi, its still pushing more than 10psi throughout the whole run.

Mate, I'm runnin in my R32 Gtst 14psi, dyno'd at 165.6rwkw/457Nm @ 6500rpm tuned on a 28deg day by Dr Drift and only managed a 14.452 at 98.7mph.

I have a full 3" turbo back, hi flow cat, intercooler, pod, bigger fuel pump & boost controller for the life of me couldn't break the 100mph mark no matter how many times I tried(did 15 runs)

My best re-action time was .440.

There's a big difference of what a 20yr old car can do compared to a fresh outa the factory car sprouting figures on paper is meant to do.

Mine before remapping was puttin out 116rwkw with all the mods I have listed and was running lean as up top before remap.

The only way you will know is to get it on the strip & see for yourself- if your up in Qld your welcome to come to our next Drag day & see how you go-we would love to see you there-Qld Events team out :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...