Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

apexi power fc isnt a piggy back ECU.....its a stand alone ecu..........unlike the greddy emanage which is a piggy back ecu

guess it comes down to how much u want to spend...

power fc's are becoming rarer for the 34's cause they arent being made anymore.....so u can pay up to $1500 for one......and no they dont make power fc's for n/a's u have to use the turbo ecu and yes it does work cause i have a r34 gtt power fc in my r34 n/a

so on top of that u then need to allow maybe 500-600 for tuning in off the power fc.....

i cant say anything in regards with the greddy emanage cause ive never used one....

but yeah i guess in the end in comes down to how much u have to spend on it all....out of either of them my tuner always told me if i can get my hands on a power fc to do that.....if i couldnt then go to the emanage.

apexi power fc isnt a piggy back ECU.....its a stand alone ecu..........unlike the greddy emanage which is a piggy back ecu

guess it comes down to how much u want to spend...

power fc's are becoming rarer for the 34's cause they arent being made anymore.....so u can pay up to $1500 for one......and no they dont make power fc's for n/a's u have to use the turbo ecu and yes it does work cause i have a r34 gtt power fc in my r34 n/a

so on top of that u then need to allow maybe 500-600 for tuning in off the power fc.....

i cant say anything in regards with the greddy emanage cause ive never used one....

but yeah i guess in the end in comes down to how much u have to spend on it all....out of either of them my tuner always told me if i can get my hands on a power fc to do that.....if i couldnt then go to the emanage.

Thanks for the help mate, does anyone know anything else

  • 3 weeks later...
Thanks for the help mate, does anyone know anything else

I have an R34 GTT with an Emanage Ultimate. The choice was easier for me because I have an auto so a piggy-back computer is the easier option. I have an aftermwarket turbo installed so I needed an ECU to cater for the additional fuel needs.

I think the EMU is great. I have a lot of fun playing with the tune. I have a wideband O2 sensor to monitor AFRs.

What mods have you done or are you planning to do to your N/A R34?

Don't forget the piggy back will cost more to install due to all the wiring that has to be done +tuning costs. You might get get the eManage Ultimate for around $900 then add costs of optional harnesses if required, $350 is pretty common for a piggy back install...getting close to the cost of a PowerFC?

Generally speaking, a standalone ECU like a PowerFC is the better way to go. If you have an auto though you're kinda stuck for options..

As Cara said it really depends on how much you want to spend, and also what you want to get out of your car. If you're only doing a CAI, Headers, Catback and just want to fine tune that, then a SAFC will be able to do that job. If you're looking at bigger mods like cams, port/polishing then start looking at the higher end of engine management. The factory ECU is quite capable with re-learning simple breathing mods.

The best thing you can do though, which is something I should have done, sit down with your mechanic and discuss your options, what you want to plan to do. Then from there you can work out what engine management you need (simple piggy back, or eManage Ultimate, or PowerFC) and it also helps if your tuner prefers the ECU that you get. Some tuners love the PowerFC but won't touch eManage, and vice versa. I had one workshop refuse to quote me on my turbo conversion, party cause of the nature of the conversion (high comp +turbo), but just as much because they don't like to use the eManage. They couldn't really give me a valid explanation as to why though... but certainly something to consider when choosing a tuner.

I would go for the eManage Ultimate if you have an auto. I went with eManage Blue myself, purely cause of the price I picked up the unit and harnesses for.

Edited by N-DAWG
What mods have you done or are you planning to do to your N/A R34?

Don't forget the piggy back will cost more to install due to all the wiring that has to be done +tuning costs. You might get get the eManage Ultimate for around $900 then add costs of optional harnesses if required, $350 is pretty common for a piggy back install...getting close to the cost of a PowerFC?

Generally speaking, a standalone ECU like a PowerFC is the better way to go. If you have an auto though you're kinda stuck for options..

As Cara said it really depends on how much you want to spend, and also what you want to get out of your car. If you're only doing a CAI, Headers, Catback and just want to fine tune that, then a SAFC will be able to do that job. If you're looking at bigger mods like cams, port/polishing then start looking at the higher end of engine management. The factory ECU is quite capable with re-learning simple breathing mods.

The best thing you can do though, which is something I should have done, sit down with your mechanic and discuss your options, what you want to plan to do. Then from there you can work out what engine management you need (simple piggy back, or eManage Ultimate, or PowerFC) and it also helps if your tuner prefers the ECU that you get. Some tuners love the PowerFC but won't touch eManage, and vice versa. I had one workshop refuse to quote me on my turbo conversion, party cause of the nature of the conversion (high comp +turbo), but just as much because they don't like to use the eManage. They couldn't really give me a valid explanation as to why though... but certainly something to consider when choosing a tuner.

I would go for the eManage Ultimate if you have an auto. I went with eManage Blue myself, purely cause of the price I picked up the unit and harnesses for.

Well i have done cat back and i am planning on doing cold air then looking at doing cams, coil pack and fuel

You won't really need engine management till you do cams and internal engine work and change things like the fuel injectors.

For the cost of the engine management +tuning, I would look at finishing the exhaust and CAI and coilpacks first. Save the engine management for when you "need" it.

Look at getting extractors, Coby Extractors from PartsCo in NZ, or DKNE Extractors in Australia (can't really comment on either myself, but Coby's have delivered well for other SAU members, and some have had good experiences with DKNE). You'll be best to get them HPC coated which makes them pricey, but you won't corrode them wiht heat wrap. Might as well upgrade to a hi-flow cat (particularly if you've still got the compliance cat), then get the air intake sorted. Don't just rip out the box and throw in a pod unless you plan to box it up and run a cold air feed. If not, you'll be better off with a K&N Panel filter.

Coilpacks are a simple replacement, no special tuning required for that.

Btw..What size catback do you have? 2.5"? 3"? You'll be getting a lot more air in and out of the engine with upgrading the cams, you want to make sure the exhaust is going to flow adequately with the new cams, though this depends also on whether you want more power down low, or top end power. Without doing internal engine work, a 2.5" system will give you more low down/mid range power, whereas a 3" will give you more top end power in the high rev range.

Remember Fuel + Air + Spark = Power. There's no need for bigger injectors and hi flow fuel pump unless your getting more air in and out of the engine than the R34 GT injectors/pump can supply. Changing the injectors and pump will require retuning, and is isn't going to net you any performance gains unless it's being used, so save this for when you do the cams etc.. that's if you need them. When you do need them, R34 GTT injectors make good budget upgrades for the R34 NEO (R32 and R33 won't fit in factory form, nor will GTR injectors)

Basically, to summarise it in the order that I would look at:

Catback, Extractors & Hi Flow Cat, CAI.

Reset the ECU for it to relearn the changes and adjust.

Then look at port polishing, raising compression, bigger cams, adjustable cam gears etc... (all that can easily add up to big dollars and don't expect huge gains for your $$$) THEN you will NEED something like the eManage or PowerFC. Even at that point you MAY not need to upgrade the fuel system (someone please confirm this, as I'm not entirely sure with this level of modification on an N/A). Of course if you plan on running NOS then you will need bigger injectors (probably aftermarket) and aftermarket injectors are not cheap.

I know that I've diverted a bit from the topic of Power FC vs the eManage Ultimate, but from what you're saying I just felt like there were a number of other things to be looking at before spending out on engine management and tuning when there isn't really any need for it with the mods you've done, and still a lot more that can be done before it's really needed, or at least before a high end engine management system is needed.

My advice is to use that sort of money to get more power out of it first by removing all the other restrictions that exist.

power fc.

do NOT get the EMU.

from personal experience the emu isnt worth the price autobarn sell them for.

once hooked up, me and my mechanic couldnt get it to run normally. the bitch was backfiring, missing etc.

although the emu looks good with its launch control etc, but really...when are u going to use it.

in the end i found out the hard way that although the pfc is OOOLD, it is a tried and proven technology. furthermore, no one here in qld can tune the damn buggers (emu's). Godzilla motorsport said they ''may'' be able to do it. but would need the car for a week!!!

pls dont get an emu.

Edited by r33cruiser

r33cruiser is right about the cost, the EMU was not cheap

plus, as he said not many tuners like to tune it (which is a valid reason not to get it).

For me, I find it awesome because I am technical person and love to play with it. I record drives almost daily on my laptop via USB 2, analyse the graphs it records and adjust the tune each night. I find it easy and fun.

My last tune on the dyno (by my mechanic) yielded 323rwhp @12-14psi (sorry I am turbo)

With the EMU I can maintain a pretty consistent desired AFR and I can modify ignition timing.

If I was manual I probably would have tried to source a PowerFC - I've heard so much positive info about them, however they are hard to find these days.

The SAFC is cheap, and looks good, but doesn't allow tuning of ignition timing (which is where the best gains can be found). I have a friend with one on a Honda and he is happy with it (so simple we wired it ourselves)

After getting my EMU, the NisTune chip came out which my mechanic has been promoting since. It may be another option for you.

I wouldn't say don't get the EMU, but I would agree it is not the cheapest option and requires some patience to get setup and get results.

I also agree with the above posts that money would be better spent on other mods first. I only needed the EMU because I have heaps more airflow since upgarding the turbo.

Edited by scags

it really depends on your budget and the tuner.

some prefer emanage as its easier to tune & vice versa.

for your application, a emanage will be fine (even a emanage blue which is half price of emu)

if you want more info on emanage, google up "status tuning" theyre in vic but they love the emanage blue & ultimates and they'll tell you how good the emanage really is (alot of ppl under rate it)

Like Dori said, even the eManage Blue will be fine for N/A...hey I'm using it for my turbo conversion! Look around to try pick one up at a good price... I got mine for $320 posted (private sale, but unused) and the optional harnesses worked out around $70AUD each from Japan through Perfrectrun.

Also check out this site that Dori sent me before: www.etuner.com.au

^ etuner is a legend! he does alot of work on soarercentral (his coming up to syd in a few weeks) and his gonna be doing my car! very helpful bloke, knows his shiet about emanage and has had good review & results !!

if you are in vic, definately pay him a visit.

since u got the pfc already, might as well whack that in, otherwise sell it for cash, buy a cheap emanage blue lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...