Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry, I miss read your post :blush:

lol I usually would have let it go but its too damn hot in here and the air con stopped being effective several hours ago :P ... its making me grumpy

...Melbourne is melting!

oh and didn't URAS have a pressure sensor thing he was using to measure the effectiveness of wings? I remember the thread but can't find it.... it was a few years ago I think

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dane I'm not sure how effective the wing pictured (your old one) would be... the airflow over the back of the 180 would probably stay attached to the car until the very edge of the boot meaning no real flow over the wing (mostly under)... however if the wing was mounted higher than the roof it would catch the unattached airflow over the car

most serious circuit cars have the wing high up above the roofline of the car for this reason...

Edit: ah beat me to the punch re. height kingscorp!

isn't that what I said? (all the airflow under, none over) I'm fairly certain I understand how wings work;) the high/low pressure is caused by the difference in speed the air passes by each side of the wing due to its shape

yeah it would have been better on an S14 Dane, not perfect cos the air would have been pretty turbulent

Laminar/attached airflow creates less turbulence and therefore the wing would get more airflow over it on the back of the 180, not less. On the S14 where the unattached flow off the roofline would become disturbed/turbulent, a wing would work less effectively in the turbulent air and need to be higher to try and get in good clean/undisturbed air. That's why race cars mount wings high as possible/allowed under ther regulations.

Laminar/attached airflow creates less turbulence and therefore the wing would get more airflow over it on the back of the 180, not less. On the S14 where the unattached flow off the roofline would become disturbed/turbulent, a wing would work less effectively in the turbulent air and need to be higher to try and get in good clean/undisturbed air. That's why race cars mount wings high as possible/allowed under ther regulations.

what he said :blink:

what he said :(

sorry, sounded like you were saying the opposite

the airflow over the back of the 180 would probably stay attached to the car until the very edge of the boot meaning no real flow over the wing (mostly under)...

(all the airflow under, none over)

it would have been better on an S14

As has been stated earlier in the thread, concentrate on mechanical grip first, then start playing with aero.

I've said it on a few different forums when this topic pops up (and generally get ignored): If your car isn't balanced without a wing then you are really just masking a problem by adding one, rather than fixing the issue and then moving forward by adding aero.

Personally i wouldn't add more than a stock style wing without looking at front splitters and decent front aero.

yeh, this is the way im going to proceed. im shore all you boys will help me with set-up. if it gets too hard well put the wing on. Definately have other things to spend the cash on. Dane, where did you get the wing and if you dont mind saying how much?

As has been stated earlier in the thread, concentrate on mechanical grip first, then start playing with aero.

I've said it on a few different forums when this topic pops up (and generally get ignored): If your car isn't balanced without a wing then you are really just masking a problem by adding one, rather than fixing the issue and then moving forward by adding aero.

Personally i wouldn't add more than a stock style wing without looking at front splitters and decent front aero.

Chris:

It's basically a flat piece that sits under the front bar as low to the ground as possible and acts like a wing sucking the car to the ground. You see them on the V8Supercars or John's 300ZX. Many race cars have them the entire length underneath the car, like an F1 car hence why they can drive upside down.

No Ando you nut-case. What I'm saying is if you load the rears up with too much down force you will lose front grip,,,hence understeer.

LOL i am nuts .. but i aint gonna generate enuff speed in the S13 to worry about loosing grip :)

Yeah great advice, aero only really comes into play at higher speeds anyway.

Your better off increasing rear grip with either increased track, better suspension or better tyres.

Thats exactly what i meant.... thus why i am considering my purchase was in vain as i want the functionality of my boot, so cant fabricate a mount to avoid the boot 'flex'

Excuse my n00bness.....again... :(

But when people say front splitters - how does this help? and any pics or info?

Cheers!

Sucks the car to the ground....

image

IMG_3021.jpg

Lol at car thou!!! Its the black thing at bottom of bumper....

plan on doing the front bar, but only allowed to sheet to the rear edge of the front bar from what i understand.

Chris:

It's basically a flat piece that sits under the front bar as low to the ground as possible and acts like a wing sucking the car to the ground. You see them on the V8Supercars or John's 300ZX. Many race cars have them the entire length underneath the car, like an F1 car hence why they can drive upside down.

Stick your arm out the window at 60km/h. If the wing has enough surface area then they can start to produce a normal force pretty early, Hence why many are adjustable so you can tweak them for different average speed tracks

True true but how does one retain standard boot usage and remove the flex of a boot under 'load'/downforce. Only thing i can think of is an aluminium frame that you bolt to the underside of the boot and wing... then has 'feet' measured up exactly to sit on the base of the boot floor creating a brace as such..... meh... seems all too hard for little gain...

There are several ways. For a Skyline the easiest way it to make sure the swing of the boot is rigid to the lock or catch and make sure the spoiler is located near the knuckle on the back of the boot as that is where its most rigid. Or you can drill holes in the boot and mount a bracket of the back of the beaver panel so that when you close the boot the mount sits proud of the boot, then you just throw on the upright and blade

There are a few other ways but they add to the complexity of getting the thing open and closed

True true but how does one retain standard boot usage and remove the flex of a boot under 'load'/downforce. Only thing i can think of is an aluminium frame that you bolt to the underside of the boot and wing... then has 'feet' measured up exactly to sit on the base of the boot floor creating a brace as such..... meh... seems all too hard for little gain...

That seems to be a good way to do it mate, see below:

post-8405-1233267608_thumb.jpg

post-8405-1233267615_thumb.jpg

post-8405-1233267622_thumb.jpg

Stu, I bought my C-West from URAS on here a few years ago, and I got it for around $300 from memory. They pop up on the forums every now and then, but I think this version is the best of the aluminium ones, with a nice big plane and good, solid uprights.

Chris: This is a front splitter on a 180 that I'm planning on copying for my car, with the addition of NACA ducts to it to aid airflow and help keep the car cool:

post-8405-1233270472_thumb.jpg

post-8405-1233270495_thumb.jpg

post-8405-1233270505_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...