Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

righto off to do battle again today!

Got a new Z06, GT2, GT3RS and a bloody great viper to deal with, ohh and nearly forgot those 2 insanely fast EVO's with the 2.4 litre engines (4g64 block) running GT38 turbos.

Also seems we have been discovered by the europian racing series as we now have guests teams showing up to race here for testing before their seasons start in march. All thanks to Sky sport broadcasting our race series in the UK. What the bet we will have BTCC cars here in the near future. Gotta feel sorry for my battered old warhorse, but skylines rule !

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254769-uaetcc-round-4/
Share on other sites

going to be needing it in bucket loads

SMOKE THEM CHRIS ,How`s the porker going ???,done many mile`s in her of late :D

,my mate`s just done few mod`s on his,few more to go :) ,would be good to see BTCC out there plenty of English over there,hope to see some photo`s up soon cheer`s chuckie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254769-uaetcc-round-4/#findComment-4397449
Share on other sites

lol you have to pick the target. I remember when racing in the might 'woos there were 2 guys that you had to turn into before they turned into you...otherwise you would loose the momentum not them. made for some big bills really.

good luck chris.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254769-uaetcc-round-4/#findComment-4398758
Share on other sites

done and dusted!

popped a coolers hose in race one after a poor quaily so started 9 out of 28for race one, seems some one forgot to inform me that they conbined the free practice and quailifying into the same session. So here i am bedding a set of front brakes in, grrrrr although did get to 5th before popped said bastard hose.

Race 2 start 28 and finished 4th cant tell you what a difference mountain runners 4wd controller made! the old warhorse flew the flag in the last race but a dose of very pi@#ed off driver does help every now and again.

But man that 8.4 litre viper is just brutal and with 345 rear slicks it just hauls butt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254769-uaetcc-round-4/#findComment-4399061
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...